gmaxwell (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8805
|
|
November 30, 2013, 12:35:58 AM |
|
I propose we merge custom hardware into mining hardware: All viable bitcoin mining hardware today is "custom" to some extent. I also propose we create a "mining hardware development" subforum to host the small amount of actual development discussion.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Ridicuss
|
|
November 30, 2013, 12:46:54 AM |
|
Seems logical.
|
Man, I wish I could change my avatar!
|
|
|
Zelek Uther
|
|
November 30, 2013, 01:22:43 AM |
|
Agreed.
|
Run a Bitcoin node, support the network.
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
|
November 30, 2013, 01:33:21 AM |
|
Pfft ya think. Mentioned that back what? 4 months ago.
|
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
|
November 30, 2013, 01:58:32 AM |
|
Seems reasonable.
|
|
|
|
WynX
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
November 30, 2013, 02:01:30 AM |
|
I propose we merge custom hardware into mining hardware: All viable bitcoin mining hardware today is "custom" to some extent.
Agreed I also propose we create a "mining hardware development" subforum to host the small amount of actual development discussion.
Thoughts?
Hmm, from a maintenance perspective...how can you easily establish 'development' from the 'established' products? What I tend to see atm is lots of initial discussions (dev) possibly resulting in a real product. Obviously the market will mature more and more, having more established manufacturers posting on their new and directly deliverable products. However I feel that maintaining that is operating in the grey zone (?).
|
|
|
|
RenHoek
|
|
November 30, 2013, 02:32:49 AM |
|
no, all is fine as it is!
|
Esst mehr Scheisse, millionen Fliegen können nicht irren! For this valueable Tip your ฿ Donation to: 1DNbwKGmQytSY69TuK9fLFQVXQjnVw18pY
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
|
November 30, 2013, 02:37:14 AM |
|
I think its fine as it is. If there was no need for non custom hardware talk, why are there still 100s of posts in there? We don't want non-custom in custom so why force them into here.
|
|
|
|
regular
|
|
November 30, 2013, 03:09:27 AM |
|
I think back then the non-custom hardware had much more GPU related discussions which are now obsolete. There doesn't seem to be a reason to split off ASICs into "custom hardware" anymore.
|
|
|
|
fsb4000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 30, 2013, 03:16:24 AM |
|
I propose we merge custom hardware into mining hardware: All viable bitcoin mining hardware today is "custom" to some extent. I also propose we create a "mining hardware development" subforum to host the small amount of actual development discussion.
Thoughts?
Agreed
|
|
|
|
zero-asic
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
November 30, 2013, 03:17:44 AM |
|
I think that the ASIC related discussions could be moved to the Hardware section and discussion of things like K16 boards could stay in the Custom hardware section.
|
|
|
|
gmaxwell (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8805
|
|
November 30, 2013, 03:45:56 AM |
|
I think its fine as it is. If there was no need for non custom hardware talk, why are there still 100s of posts in there? We don't want non-custom in custom so why force them into here.
Go look in the regular hardware forum... most of what gets put there gets moved by mods into custom hardware, and most of what remains is arguably misplaced anyways.
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1220
|
|
November 30, 2013, 08:41:14 AM |
|
Seeing as the distinction used to be gpu vs other. Why not split it like that, make a gpu mining sub forum and make custom the main forum for hardware
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
November 30, 2013, 08:48:41 AM |
|
Fine by me since just about every GPU mining thread posted is slated for the altcoin area. I don't even have GPU mining code in cgminer any more, and there is no such thing as commodity hardware relevant for mining bitcoin.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
November 30, 2013, 10:12:25 PM |
|
shouldn't everything just go into the KNC thread?
|
|
|
|
Big Time Coin
|
|
December 01, 2013, 02:54:27 AM |
|
ugh this is bad idea because we would need to make a separate sub-forum for "scrypt" mining and "SHA256" mining. Right now custom hardware is de facto SHA256 mining and mining is scrypt mining.
|
Big time, I'm on my way I'm making it, big time, oh yes - Peter Gabriel
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 01, 2013, 05:47:50 AM |
|
ugh this is bad idea because we would need to make a separate sub-forum for "scrypt" mining and "SHA256" mining. Right now custom hardware is de facto SHA256 mining and mining is scrypt mining.
No it's not. The custom hardware topic is for bitcoin mining. Post something about anything else and you'll get your arse removed immediately to the altcoin topic.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
December 02, 2013, 09:43:23 AM Last edit: December 02, 2013, 09:55:23 AM by rupy |
|
Well, the mining rig photos thread has lot of litecoin in there too.
Why not just create 4 subfolders: CPU, GPU, FPGA and ASIC, that should cover it?
*secretly hoping for a FPGA coin with dynamic hashing, would QuarkCoin work?*
We need to take advantage of all those SPARTAN-6 y'know!
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
The Ghola
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 02, 2013, 06:33:56 PM |
|
great and idea and perfect sense
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
December 02, 2013, 06:35:43 PM |
|
I was thinking this the other day. The split made sense when ASICs were theoretical and GPU were mainstream. Today nobody mines Bitcoins with anything other than ASICs and it seems there is some cross posting and "incorrect" posting which means people end up reading both forums anyways.
|
|
|
|
|