For bounty program rule, what's your opinion: "making weekly report or not"

[mamesso]

bounties without every week report collected on bountyhive platform and Hotachy bounty manager!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1103907

Manager irfanpak without reports. irfan using a practical bounty portal.
I see managers getting lazy and daring to replace human jobs with robots.

Isnt a surprising thing because sooner or later people would really find out new things which would really be beneficial into its job which would really give the convenience without doing much work because of automation. They are not lazy but somehow they do able to make their jobs faster due to that bounty portal.It isnt really bad as long report accumulated are on precise numbers.They do just work smart.

These things are depending on bounty manager it self and same as mentioned above there are bounty programs which doesnt really require weekly reports.

Automation does not escape the bugs, I example portal bountyhive there are some participants get token by registering without doing retweet or share like. this is crazy.
automation must still involve humans to perfect it.

[TheMateus]

bounties without every week report collected on bountyhive platform and Hotachy bounty manager!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1103907

Manager irfanpak without reports. irfan using a practical bounty portal.
I see managers getting lazy and daring to replace human jobs with robots.

Isnt a surprising thing because sooner or later people would really find out new things which would really be beneficial into its job which would really give the convenience without doing much work because of automation. They are not lazy but somehow they do able to make their jobs faster due to that bounty portal.It isnt really bad as long report accumulated are on precise numbers.They do just work smart.

These things are depending on bounty manager it self and same as mentioned above there are bounty programs which doesnt really require weekly reports.

Automation does not escape the bugs, I example portal bountyhive there are some participants get token by registering without doing retweet or share like. this is crazy.
automation must still involve humans to perfect it.

I agree, there must be someone both to improve and to guide such automation. And yet there is no guarantee that there will be no flaws.

[Simon37na]

Its really depend on the bounty campaign you have joined. And depend on the manager of that ICO.

[Todychopper77]

I think it is necessary, because the weekly report for a person who corrects it takes time and thoroughness, but it should be a short time-only campaign and not for months

[AlanShlafter]

I see many bounty programs are requiring to make weekly report but some the other do not require to make weekly report. Do you know why?
What do you think about the advantage and disadvantage? Thank you.

I prefer not making weekly reports because it need a lot of effort. Some compaigns doesn't want it, because they have automation tools to detect your shares and retweets.

[indobitcoin.tk]

If you see one side just might be a lot of people say it's inconvenient. but it is precisely this will create benefits both. the manager will be increasingly easy to the do-checking job. for participants, this will data used as evidence of their work. If there is a mismatch then there will be the proof of the report have been made each week.

[mamesso]

bounties without every week report collected on bountyhive platform and Hotachy bounty manager!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1103907

Manager irfanpak without reports. irfan using a practical bounty portal.
I see managers getting lazy and daring to replace human jobs with robots.

Isnt a surprising thing because sooner or later people would really find out new things which would really be beneficial into its job which would really give the convenience without doing much work because of automation. They are not lazy but somehow they do able to make their jobs faster due to that bounty portal.It isnt really bad as long report accumulated are on precise numbers.They do just work smart.

These things are depending on bounty manager it self and same as mentioned above there are bounty programs which doesnt really require weekly reports.

Automation does not escape the bugs, I example portal bountyhive there are some participants get token by registering without doing retweet or share like. this is crazy.
automation must still involve humans to perfect it.

I agree, there must be someone both to improve and to guide such automation. And yet there is no guarantee that there will be no flaws.

Actually human work is greatly helped by automation, but dev should evaluate system deficiencies. If there is a bug or dev error it should immediately respond quickly and fix it.
I heard bountyhive will be adding a spreadsheet on their platform.

[litolapis1]

It depends on what bounty you are participating with. Some needs reports to see to it that your truly following them and their obey rules. It depends on the manager your joining in.

[bagikoin]

If it already is a rule then just do it. this if it is very necessary because it could have the data if any of the glaring discrepancy between what we used to do with what is written or paid by the manager of the bounty. with the report will certainly mutually know each other's mistakes.

[jamesbond007pro]

Its really depend on the bounty campaign you have joined. And depend on the manager of that ICO.

Yes, we know that, but we want to know the advantage of the "making weekly report or not", and why need to do that? Why they have that rule?

[jamesbond007pro]

In this issue there are pros and cons. Firstly, as already written, it all depends on the managers (so far, without the weekly reports I met only Hotachy and Sylon). I've already got used to doing weekly reports, for me it's better, it's like guaranteeing that my work will be accurately noticed and appreciated. Although this also takes some time

Thank you for your opinion. This time i have seen some campaigns there are many scammers try to get our data information and join the same campaign to get the rewards (they do not do anything). This is very difficult for bounty manager to know who are you and who are scammers. Do you have any ideas? 

[jamesbond007pro]

If it already is a rule then just do it. this if it is very necessary because it could have the data if any of the glaring discrepancy between what we used to do with what is written or paid by the manager of the bounty. with the report will certainly mutually know each other's mistakes.

In my opinion, when you join many campaigns of 1 team, your personal information will be spy by scammers. And scammers will use this to join the same campaign with you to earn rewards. Could you please share me your experience?

[tendy263]

Depend on the campaign (twitter, facebook, reddit, signature, translate...), they require different ways to report. Because there are some tools allow they can check what the participants do on some platforms without report so the campaign base on that platform they don't require weekly report. But some campaigns there are no tool help to check, they must do manually so they require we must report to help them check easier.

[CryptoSheikh]

Most of the bounty managers require weekly reports. It'd be easier for us if there weren't weekly report reuirements. However there some websites which don't require reports at all (bountyhive for example)

[CryptRoller]

No problem with weekly reports. It helps me to keep it manageable. I use weekly reports in my own spreadsheet also for campaigns that don't require reports (like bountyhive)

[Vektrum]

I see many bounty programs are requiring to make weekly report but some the other do not require to make weekly report. Do you know why?
What do you think about the advantage and disadvantage? Thank you.

Typically, the requirement of a weekly report refers to members of the generosity campaign on social networks. The earnings campaign manager can always look at the signature campaign member's profile and check both the quantity and, most importantly, the quality of the written messages. Therefore, additional reports from the participant of the campaign are not required. However, I have met recently and how much ICO campaigns, where such reports were required and from the participants of the signature campaign. I did not join this campaign in principle, even despite its prospects.

[kreket1]

Some managers simply have software that collects links. But there are disadvantages in this. If you have too many retweets and reposts, then this software will not collect all your links

[BlackMoon258]

I think "one post and edit" is better for bounty tracking. It's hard for bounty admin to track your reports in many pages, and they have to check every week instead of checking only one time at the end of bounty campaign.

[TheMateus]

I think "one post and edit" is better for bounty tracking. It's hard for bounty admin to track your reports in many pages, and they have to check every week instead of checking only one time at the end of bounty campaign.

Posting to a single post decreases the topic, helps you find your own psot, and makes it easy for the manager. I see it that way.

[yangtinglei]

As for the bounty report, my view is that as a bounty hunter, making sure the work is more standardized will only cause minor problems. For the project team, he won't waste his token.