Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2018, 09:50:49 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you think it is fair to save merits for high-quality, low-ranked members?  (Read 486 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
_Miracle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 506


Do due diligence


View Profile WWW
May 18, 2018, 08:43:27 AM
 #41

I would have liked to have been flush with Smerit. It had been awhile since hanging out here. I had 20 and gave them away quickly still wishing to give about 60 more out.
I think it's fair for people to give them as they see fit. Shooooot if someone makes me laugh that's a +merit -)
1529661049
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529661049

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529661049
Reply with quote  #2

1529661049
Report to moderator
The World's Betting Exchange

Bet with play money. Win real Bitcoin. 5BTC Prize Fund for World Cup 2018.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1529661049
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529661049

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529661049
Reply with quote  #2

1529661049
Report to moderator
malekcap
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 12


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2018, 12:14:53 AM
 #42

i think is fair and so nobly! but if and only if these post really deserve a merits! we dont want merits for shitty or spammy posts so we want keep the form cleam from those kind of people so we dont should to encourage them by giving them a merits but we must to help people who deserve help  Smiley
_Miracle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 506


Do due diligence


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2018, 01:00:42 AM
Merited by suchmoon (5), Jet Cash (1)
 #43

I gave mine to those who had helped me (or made me laugh) in the past. I gave one away to someone who has passed soooooo while that person didn't need it he absolutely deserved it.
"Fair" is a tricky and practically pointless word when asking what someone should do with their own belongings, votes, merit or whatever else.

I'm personally fine knowing I will not likely ever make legendary status (Hero is enough pressure as it is ;-).
Not sure how the merit system will shake out but it IS an improvement, I hope it will discourage the multiple accounts trying to "level up" to make money by spamming here.

Whatever happened to having a forum where people with the same interest exchange ideas...for enjoyment?
Jet Cash
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 925


Lets Talk Merit


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2018, 12:24:55 PM
 #44


Whatever happened to having a forum where people with the same interest exchange ideas...for enjoyment?

It's this one - there are loads of people exchanging ideas about bounties, and they must gain enjoyment from the self-flagellation of not receiving those bounties.
Bitminer1224
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10

Hello!


View Profile
May 21, 2018, 03:46:50 AM
 #45

I don’t  get enough smerits to spend as often as I would like to. This has made me decide that I am only going to give merits to high quality posters, lower ranked members; I won’t give any for Legendary members and maybe not to Hero members either.

I think it is better due to scarcity to save them for people who have a long way to rank up rather than for those who are at the top already and get merits easily.

What do you think about? Do you do the same? Do you think it is fair?

It can be theorized that its better to save up sMerit for lower rank users that "need" it but that's really only one side to it. Its all based on the person who owns the sMerit and what they deem as a good post. As I've read many people on this topic agree that merit should be awarded to posts regardless of rank but by the value of the post. The two values I've noticed are posts that are useful, or posts that give the sMerit owner a laugh. Both contain values which are based by the opinion of the owner of the sMerit. I personally think it is fair but one maybe probable flaw I believe is that lesser known users may have a harder time being noticed. I say that its possibly probable because if a low rank user can consistently produce helpful posts in the community then they should be starting to rake in the merit and reap the rank they are aiming for eventually.
cryptoaddictchie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 16


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2018, 05:10:25 AM
 #46

I think its a good idea, cause you're saving those low ranked member but quality poster. Me too I don't get enough smerit, so I'm saving as well for those quality post, I prefer to give it to lower rank as well I know whay it feels like how hard they are trying to be given merits. High ranking member deserved smerit as well but the lower ranked needed it most.

Nice question by the way, sorry don't have smerit  to award you but if I have Ill give you for this statement of yours.
Viarahine
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
May 26, 2018, 01:00:32 PM
 #47

we consider it as a form of charity.
Merit is not charity. If you want it, you'll have to earn it.
Now it's turning into a business. I've seen posts about sMerit buying/selling more than once. After all, there are high-quality posts that are not awarded smerit, because it is easier to sell than to put just like that.
vapourminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1767
Merit: 1046


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
May 26, 2018, 01:33:26 PM
 #48

i have found my criteria for meriting posts changes when i am almost out of smerits. and it does tend to lean towards giving to lower ranks at that time. which is unfair on my part.

legendaries obviously dont need smerits for ranking up, but i figure (generally) legendaries will give out merit with greater "accuracy" than lower ranks simply because they know more about the subject matter and what benefits the forum than lower ranks. so they definitely need merits sent to them.

OTOH for lower ranks it can be discouraging for them to have good posts skipped, where legendaries probably wont care as much (at least i dont). i like to encourage them.

when i only have one or two smerits left i find myself withholding smerits on the off chance i might find a better post later, and thats kinda a pain. i wound up with a bookmark folder named "merit these posts" for when i have smerits to send lol. when i go through that folder, lower ranks do get preference all else being equal.

is that unfair toward legendaries on my part. well, yes.  on average, legendary posts do tend to be better quality and thus deserve merit like any other quality. but since smerits are intended to reward good posting habits, and (generally) legendaries already have that, the merit goes toward the lower ranks to "point the way" so to speak.
coinlocket$
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 262


Earn with impressio.io


View Profile WWW
May 26, 2018, 09:17:04 PM
 #49

Generally I tend to use my sMerit to reward people without legendary rank even if they deserve it, they do not need it.
Very often they are not interested in merit and therefore I prefer to use it for helping people with a minor rank.
ckcharlie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 27, 2018, 12:58:08 PM
 #50

I, unsurprisingly, think this is a great idea. The higher ranked members have a lot of excess merit and do not need more. Can someone tell me where the merit came from originally and what the criteria was for it's original distribution? Was it a reward for higher ranked members at the outset? I've been here since December last year and granted am not on here all the time, didn't hear about how to receive merits when they were introduced.

I think encouraging newer members is a good policy to decide on gifting your merit.
JungleBadman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 0

Simple Liquidity – Fueled by NEO


View Profile
May 28, 2018, 10:25:42 AM
 #51

To be honest, there are plenty of members dishing out merit regardless of rank, so if you want to focus on lower ranked members then that's great. There are a tonne of junior members like me that are finding it hard to get off the ground regardless of how active I am on here and I think its probably just a case of many good posts and the relative rarity of merit.
mirzamuneeeb
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 28, 2018, 06:42:19 PM
 #52

Hello as a low-ranked member I believe this merit system is good and your idea of saving is not bad as long you really give it to people who deserve it. I believe you will be often seeing yourself giving merit to older people because they are more used and better on finding and posting interesting content. However, I really would like a system where anyone can highlight a good post (tho I fear the spamming), so it's easier for veterans to see it and give it more merit chances, I often see really fruitful topics without any merit and I wonder if it's not because enough veterans has seen it.
LTU_btc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 539

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2018, 11:07:57 PM
 #53

OP, iI support your attitude. Unfortunately, in recent weeks I don't have enough time to browse forum and give Merits to users who deserves it. Or I just become too lazy. So, I still have plenty of my sMerit to give.
It's not fair. Higher-ranked users still need sMerits to reward other users. You should merit posts that deserve it, regardless of rank.
I understand your point, but I think it's some kind of waste of Merit to give it to Legendaries. Ok, I give 2 Merits to Legendary member and he get only 1 sMerit which he can send to low-ranked member. So, I would better to give my 2 Merits directly to low ranked users. But I'm not saying that we shouldn't give Merits to high ranked members. When I see Legendary with high number of Merits, it's like an indicator that he is great poster and it's worth to read what he wrote.
Gastonic
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 0

ELYSIAN | Pre-TGE 5.21.2018 | TGE 6.04.2018


View Profile WWW
May 30, 2018, 09:03:57 AM
 #54

I believe it is very fair. We, the newbies are trying to rank up as much as we can. but if we dont get merit, we are until jr. member. Any kind hearted person can can help us with this. But in the end, its up to the user ti share its merits.
babysweetTiger0401
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 397
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 04:44:32 PM
 #55

I don’t  get enough smerits to spend as often as I would like to. This has made me decide that I am only going to give merits to high quality posters, lower ranked members; I won’t give any for Legendary members and maybe not to Hero members either.

I think it is better due to scarcity to save them for people who have a long way to rank up rather than for those who are at the top already and get merits easily.

What do you think about? Do you do the same? Do you think it is fair?


You're style was quite good, as I can see with it you want to waste your merit to some poster who do shit or none sense posting. Imagine if we

send merit to high quality poster it will really boost and uplift more their confidence in terms of what they're doing in posting in this thread forum

section.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!