Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 05:55:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should LTC change POW to uphold the no-asic feature of litecoin
Yes - 719 (73.2%)
No - 186 (18.9%)
What is this I don't even - 30 (3.1%)
No, because I want LTC to fail - 24 (2.4%)
Yes, because I want LTC to fail - 23 (2.3%)
Total Voters: 982

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining?  (Read 33227 times)
Gazza1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:04:27 PM
 #101

Lets avoid the ASICs, we need to keep them away from us.  They are great for bitcoin and we are proud for that.  But we need scrypt to allude them.

Impossible is a word found only in the dictionary of fools.
1714802112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714802112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714802112
Reply with quote  #2

1714802112
Report to moderator
1714802112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714802112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714802112
Reply with quote  #2

1714802112
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
j23a
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:23:31 PM
 #102

I do have to say, ASICs indeed shift the profit from those doing the actual mining to those making the mining gear.

It is a bummer.  There is a lot of fun in designing, deploying, and maintaining a large GPU farm.  I will be sad when ASICs obliterate that niche. 

That's the main issue that a lot of people don't understand. That it takes money away from the miners, and gives it to not the people who bought the ASICs, but to the companies that creates them.

People really have to think about what everybody asks, which is if they can make more money with their ASICs, then why don't they just mine it themselves. They do mine, they just sell it to people just in time for them to not be as profitable, since they have no resale value.


TBTSX4-NKRX55-HF2ECG-SHPBG3-XIDD2Y-QDRI3N-P2O6
faraway
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 339
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:40:51 PM
 #103

Are you sure that the existence of these scrypt ASIC is not a hoax? I've seen no FPGA scrypt implementation usable yet. And, having a FPGA is a first start to test and optimize a future ASIC.


In my opinion, having a fully specialized and efficient scrypt ASIC, interfaced with a high speed DDR5 memory (scrypt requires a lot of memory...) , and competitive with a R280X (4.3 billion transistors) will not be there tomorrow....
ejhuff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 03:07:30 AM
 #104

There will pretty much always be a time-memory tradeoff, because you can always avoid using memory by recomputing the data when you need it...

Not always.  For example, I don't see how you can compute this hash function without 32GiB of memory.
Code:
uint256 hash(uint256 v) {
    uint256 w[1<<30], x, y, z; // 32 GiB
    uint256 m = (1<<30) - 1;
    uint64  i, j, k;
    w[0] = v;
    for (i = 0; i < m; i++) {
        w[i+1] = sha256(w[i]);
    }
    // At this point, you can still make a time/space tradeoff, say by storing
    // only every Nth value of w, at the expense of up to N-1 sha256 operations.

    // Now mix it up some...
    for (i = j = k = 0; i <= m; i++, j = (i+j+k) & m) {
        if (i == j) j = (j+1)&m;
        k = w[j] & m;
        if (j == k) k = (k+1) & m;
        x = w[i]; y=w[j]; z=w[k];
        w[i] = sha256(y^z); w[j] = sha256(x^z); w[k] = sha256(x^y);
    }
    return w[m];
}
Sophokles
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 516


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2014, 06:41:07 AM
 #105

Are you sure that the existence of these scrypt ASIC is not a hoax? I've seen no FPGA scrypt implementation usable yet. And, having a FPGA is a first start to test and optimize a future ASIC.


In my opinion, having a fully specialized and efficient scrypt ASIC, interfaced with a high speed DDR5 memory (scrypt requires a lot of memory...) , and competitive with a R280X (4.3 billion transistors) will not be there tomorrow....

They are available- look for 'Gridseed'. At the moment, the pricing is on the level of GPU cards, in terms of kHash/$. But this is price gouging, they can be manufatured a lot cheaper, and will flood the market, once production is ramped up.
Unfortunately, because I really like running my GPU rigs  Sad









▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██
████████████████████▄
▄███
██████████████████████▄
▄████
███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄█████
███████▄
██▄██████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀
.
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████
███████████
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█
██████████████████████▀
▀██
███████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀█████████
██████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 ElonCoin.org 
.
████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
███████████████████
█████████████▄████
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀
█████▄▄
.
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"
▬▬▬▬▬
wwtree
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 07:12:24 AM
 #106

do anything need to  avoid asic

Slingshot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 03:43:43 PM
 #107

The voters spoke. But nobody listens? nor comprehends? Let alone acts?

 2014 is THE YEAR of Bitcoin. Not 2013.

 Huge things are in store for btc in 2014, and any others along for the ride, as long as their extremely well marketed and promoted. If not their merely part of the noise in the side show called the Crypto Exchanges.


 What will 2015 be? Widespread Bitcoin adoption. And whoever else has their act fully done rides along too.


 It's Winner('s) take All.

Do I need to remind the greater crypto communities that everyone hate's losers?


 The vast majority of the marketplace already has it's #1 winner.

 There are only so many runner up slot(s).

 And the point being that once one get's to that position it will be difficult to dethrone them just like it already is going to be most difficult to dethrone BTC. Only BTC is now in that position. No one else has even arrived to the party yet. And everyone else has yet to prove their even worthy of success.

 These Alt. coin runner up's (winners, if there are any more winners) must force themselves into the marketplace fast, before btc gains too much of a stranglehold on far too many, to make much market penetration possible. And they each must carve out their own territory, and greater acceptance in the mainstream.

 So far a few minor one's are much more impressive than any of the major runner up candidates in terms of their marketing, promotion, and real world applications. I wont bother to discuss the details, that should already be painfully obvious for anyone that has paid attention.

 Needless to say businesses and everyone else will not care to juggle many different crypto-currencies unless their uniquely targeting audiences for whatever reason(s). The one thing that made Litecoin special is already now missing! That can't stand, and then also hope it passes the test of wide spread review and acceptance. If Litecoin cannot defend itself from ASIC's, then what else can it not defend itself from is the very thing many will soon question.

 It was thought that the wonderful thing about Litecoin was that it is ASIC proof, and that it was THE Crypto for The MASSES. But then we find out it's not. That simply must be fixed without any further delays. Or Litecoin ends as fraudulent, and likely fails because it cannot live up to it's major claim to fame. Others already are asic proof, or so they merely claim? Yet the CPU only types are also botnet-coin specialty frauds.

 Maybe even adding PoS is possible as an alternative, I don't know. I have no idea. Just fix it. And KISS it. (Keep it simple stupid = kiss). And for certain don't screw it up while doing so. And get it correct, the 1st time. Do all that and suddenly the Litecoin development team are the new hero's in the greater Crypto-Currency Revolution that is about to take the world by storm. And doing that, plus strong promotions and ever stronger marketing will force Litecoin to be at least #2.

 Enough burning daylight. There's no time left to waste.


 2014 is the rush to get into the mainstream marketplace.
====================================

 So far LTC is barely treading water.

 ASICs will be the ruin of Litecoin. That's a no-brainer.

 Again, the community has voted, the votes are in, and no one is changing their own votes.

 There is absolutely no time to waste anymore. Please get it done now, without further delay, and get those promotions and marketing plans fully underway now too. Otherwise a stampede will out run, and out play what was to be at least #2.
Slingshot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:01:06 PM
 #108

Correction: ASIC may result in many no longer supporting Litecoin. But that is merely speculative.
                         ----

  I am merely troubled what the end results could be. After more reflection I don't want to say asic mining of Litecoin will be it's ruin because clearly that is an unknown outcome that cannot be predicted.
In fact it may well be the best thing that ever happens to Litecoin. Only time will tell that outcome.


 My last thoughts on this topic:

 I am very dismayed and disillusioned after this poll here, and the poll taken in the Litecoin forum, both on this very topic, and that both polls results display that the clear majority desire for Litecoin to be shielded from asic mining going forward, if at all possible.

 Obviously many want asic mining going forward, and their in firm command and control.

 Okay, best of luck.

  As an investor, and miner too, I decided to already make a judgement call. I took profits a few days ago, and will point my miners elsewhere.

 Lastly; Those in firm command and control Litecoin have lost the confidence of the clear majority.


Caveat emptor
mek300
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 07:59:14 PM
Last edit: February 09, 2014, 08:47:28 PM by mek300
 #109

The best way to deter ASIC mining from gpu mining is to create competition among ASIC mining manufacturers.

One possible way is to create a new scrypt coin with much reduced N-factor (litecoin is 10?) and have hugh supply of coins in short time span-- like 500 billion in 1 year (dogecoin has 100 billion in 1.5 years) .

So everybody - even ppl without much computer knowledge - will be able to buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and start enjoying mining and owning some "new sparkling computer coin" !!
CoinBuzz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 09:05:36 PM
 #110

The best way to deter ASIC mining from gpu mining is to create competition among ASIC mining manufacturers.

One possible way is to create a new scrypt coin with much reduced N-factor (litecoin is 10?) and have hugh supply of coins in short time span-- like 500 billion in 1 year (dogecoin has 100 billion in 1.5 years) .

So everybody - even ppl without much computer knowledge - will be able to buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and start enjoying mining and owning some "new sparkling computer coin" !!

Vertcoin (VTC) is somehow similar to that

Join ASAP: FREE BITCOIN
Repool
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 09:46:21 PM
 #111

i voted yes, if you are currently mining with gpus and you are not mining vertcoin, you are doing yourself and all gpu owners a disservice and putting yourself out of business at the same time.
mek300
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 10:03:22 PM
 #112

..... If you buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and mine 1,000,000 coins, but they're only worth 0.5 USD, you lost.

People tend to forget history.

"May 21st, 2010,  Laszlo Hanyecz, a programmer living in Florida, sent 10,000 bitcoin (BTC), the online-only, open source cryptocurrency, to a volunteer in England, who then spent about $25 to order Hanyecz some Papa John's."

coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:50:29 PM
 #113

..... If you buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and mine 1,000,000 coins, but they're only worth 0.5 USD, you lost.

People tend to forget history.

"May 21st, 2010,  Laszlo Hanyecz, a programmer living in Florida, sent 10,000 bitcoin (BTC), the online-only, open source cryptocurrency, to a volunteer in England, who then spent about $25 to order Hanyecz some Papa John's."



Just because Bitcoin went to the moon doesn't mean all cryptos will.

Sometimes being first out of the gate with a new technology is an achilles' heel. But, you are right not all coins will succeed.
alximix
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 08:38:47 PM
 #114

Estimated Next Difficulty:   6,367 (+11.00%)
eroxors
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


Think. Positive. Thoughts.


View Profile WWW
March 19, 2014, 09:04:41 PM
 #115

too late?

Sophokles
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 516


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2014, 07:25:17 PM
 #116

too late?

Yes. Most likely. Unfortunately. All the GPU miners will be pushed out of the scrypt coins. Where will all the hash power go? N-factor scrypt? Or something completely new? This will be interesting.









▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██
████████████████████▄
▄███
██████████████████████▄
▄████
███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄█████
███████▄
██▄██████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀
.
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████
███████████
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█
██████████████████████▀
▀██
███████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀█████████
██████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 ElonCoin.org 
.
████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
███████████████████
█████████████▄████
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀
█████▄▄
.
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"
▬▬▬▬▬
llccool
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 08:39:12 AM
 #117

必须要改算法,干掉矿机。作者的愿望不就是没有矿机的干预吗?现在矿机来了,算法不改的话,作者会被世人耻笑的
crazy987
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 09:43:16 AM
 #118

Estimated Next Difficulty:   6,367 (+11.00%)

I dont know where you are getting your info:


Litecoin Difficulty:   5,835
Estimated Next Difficulty:   5,426 (-7.02%)


Just noticed the date, oops.
jorneyflair
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 25, 2014, 11:53:52 AM
 #119

scrypt-n asic under testing Grin
gondel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 12:00:10 PM
 #120

Hi,
Here i would defentely vote with YES. Lite coin should change and be asic protected.

BR,

Gondel
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!