Gazza1
|
|
January 30, 2014, 10:04:27 PM |
|
Lets avoid the ASICs, we need to keep them away from us. They are great for bitcoin and we are proud for that. But we need scrypt to allude them.
|
Impossible is a word found only in the dictionary of fools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
j23a
|
|
January 30, 2014, 10:23:31 PM |
|
I do have to say, ASICs indeed shift the profit from those doing the actual mining to those making the mining gear.
It is a bummer. There is a lot of fun in designing, deploying, and maintaining a large GPU farm. I will be sad when ASICs obliterate that niche.
That's the main issue that a lot of people don't understand. That it takes money away from the miners, and gives it to not the people who bought the ASICs, but to the companies that creates them. People really have to think about what everybody asks, which is if they can make more money with their ASICs, then why don't they just mine it themselves. They do mine, they just sell it to people just in time for them to not be as profitable, since they have no resale value.
|
TBTSX4-NKRX55-HF2ECG-SHPBG3-XIDD2Y-QDRI3N-P2O6
|
|
|
faraway
|
|
January 30, 2014, 10:40:51 PM |
|
Are you sure that the existence of these scrypt ASIC is not a hoax? I've seen no FPGA scrypt implementation usable yet. And, having a FPGA is a first start to test and optimize a future ASIC.
In my opinion, having a fully specialized and efficient scrypt ASIC, interfaced with a high speed DDR5 memory (scrypt requires a lot of memory...) , and competitive with a R280X (4.3 billion transistors) will not be there tomorrow....
|
|
|
|
ejhuff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:07:30 AM |
|
There will pretty much always be a time-memory tradeoff, because you can always avoid using memory by recomputing the data when you need it...
Not always. For example, I don't see how you can compute this hash function without 32GiB of memory. uint256 hash(uint256 v) { uint256 w[1<<30], x, y, z; // 32 GiB uint256 m = (1<<30) - 1; uint64 i, j, k; w[0] = v; for (i = 0; i < m; i++) { w[i+1] = sha256(w[i]); } // At this point, you can still make a time/space tradeoff, say by storing // only every Nth value of w, at the expense of up to N-1 sha256 operations.
// Now mix it up some... for (i = j = k = 0; i <= m; i++, j = (i+j+k) & m) { if (i == j) j = (j+1)&m; k = w[j] & m; if (j == k) k = (k+1) & m; x = w[i]; y=w[j]; z=w[k]; w[i] = sha256(y^z); w[j] = sha256(x^z); w[k] = sha256(x^y); } return w[m]; }
|
|
|
|
Sophokles
|
|
January 31, 2014, 06:41:07 AM |
|
Are you sure that the existence of these scrypt ASIC is not a hoax? I've seen no FPGA scrypt implementation usable yet. And, having a FPGA is a first start to test and optimize a future ASIC.
In my opinion, having a fully specialized and efficient scrypt ASIC, interfaced with a high speed DDR5 memory (scrypt requires a lot of memory...) , and competitive with a R280X (4.3 billion transistors) will not be there tomorrow....
They are available- look for 'Gridseed'. At the moment, the pricing is on the level of GPU cards, in terms of kHash/$. But this is price gouging, they can be manufatured a lot cheaper, and will flood the market, once production is ramped up. Unfortunately, because I really like running my GPU rigs
|
▄▄████████▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████████▄
| ███████████████████▄████▄ █████████████████▄███████ ████████████████▄███████▀ ██████████▄▄███▄██████▀ ████████▄████▄█████▀▀ ██████▄██████████▀ ███▄▄████████████▄ ██▄███████████████ ░▄██████████████▀ ▄█████████████▀ █████████████ ███████████▀ ███████▀▀ | | | .
| | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | . ElonCoin.org | │ | | .
| │ | ████████▄▄███████▄▄ ███████▄████████████▌ ██████▐██▀███████▀▀██ ███████████████████▐█▌ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄ ███▀░▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀ ██████████████▄██████▌ █████▐██▄██████▄████▐ █████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄ ███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀ ███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀ ▄██████▄▀███████▀ ████████▄▀████▀█████▄▄ | . "I could either watch it happen or be a part of it" ▬▬▬▬▬ |
|
|
|
wwtree
|
|
January 31, 2014, 07:12:24 AM |
|
do anything need to avoid asic
|
|
|
|
Slingshot
|
|
February 04, 2014, 03:43:43 PM |
|
The voters spoke. But nobody listens? nor comprehends? Let alone acts?
2014 is THE YEAR of Bitcoin. Not 2013.
Huge things are in store for btc in 2014, and any others along for the ride, as long as their extremely well marketed and promoted. If not their merely part of the noise in the side show called the Crypto Exchanges.
What will 2015 be? Widespread Bitcoin adoption. And whoever else has their act fully done rides along too.
It's Winner('s) take All.
Do I need to remind the greater crypto communities that everyone hate's losers?
The vast majority of the marketplace already has it's #1 winner.
There are only so many runner up slot(s).
And the point being that once one get's to that position it will be difficult to dethrone them just like it already is going to be most difficult to dethrone BTC. Only BTC is now in that position. No one else has even arrived to the party yet. And everyone else has yet to prove their even worthy of success.
These Alt. coin runner up's (winners, if there are any more winners) must force themselves into the marketplace fast, before btc gains too much of a stranglehold on far too many, to make much market penetration possible. And they each must carve out their own territory, and greater acceptance in the mainstream.
So far a few minor one's are much more impressive than any of the major runner up candidates in terms of their marketing, promotion, and real world applications. I wont bother to discuss the details, that should already be painfully obvious for anyone that has paid attention.
Needless to say businesses and everyone else will not care to juggle many different crypto-currencies unless their uniquely targeting audiences for whatever reason(s). The one thing that made Litecoin special is already now missing! That can't stand, and then also hope it passes the test of wide spread review and acceptance. If Litecoin cannot defend itself from ASIC's, then what else can it not defend itself from is the very thing many will soon question.
It was thought that the wonderful thing about Litecoin was that it is ASIC proof, and that it was THE Crypto for The MASSES. But then we find out it's not. That simply must be fixed without any further delays. Or Litecoin ends as fraudulent, and likely fails because it cannot live up to it's major claim to fame. Others already are asic proof, or so they merely claim? Yet the CPU only types are also botnet-coin specialty frauds.
Maybe even adding PoS is possible as an alternative, I don't know. I have no idea. Just fix it. And KISS it. (Keep it simple stupid = kiss). And for certain don't screw it up while doing so. And get it correct, the 1st time. Do all that and suddenly the Litecoin development team are the new hero's in the greater Crypto-Currency Revolution that is about to take the world by storm. And doing that, plus strong promotions and ever stronger marketing will force Litecoin to be at least #2.
Enough burning daylight. There's no time left to waste.
2014 is the rush to get into the mainstream marketplace. ====================================
So far LTC is barely treading water.
ASICs will be the ruin of Litecoin. That's a no-brainer.
Again, the community has voted, the votes are in, and no one is changing their own votes.
There is absolutely no time to waste anymore. Please get it done now, without further delay, and get those promotions and marketing plans fully underway now too. Otherwise a stampede will out run, and out play what was to be at least #2.
|
|
|
|
Slingshot
|
|
February 08, 2014, 09:01:06 PM |
|
Correction: ASIC may result in many no longer supporting Litecoin. But that is merely speculative. ----
I am merely troubled what the end results could be. After more reflection I don't want to say asic mining of Litecoin will be it's ruin because clearly that is an unknown outcome that cannot be predicted. In fact it may well be the best thing that ever happens to Litecoin. Only time will tell that outcome.
My last thoughts on this topic:
I am very dismayed and disillusioned after this poll here, and the poll taken in the Litecoin forum, both on this very topic, and that both polls results display that the clear majority desire for Litecoin to be shielded from asic mining going forward, if at all possible.
Obviously many want asic mining going forward, and their in firm command and control.
Okay, best of luck.
As an investor, and miner too, I decided to already make a judgement call. I took profits a few days ago, and will point my miners elsewhere.
Lastly; Those in firm command and control Litecoin have lost the confidence of the clear majority.
Caveat emptor
|
|
|
|
mek300
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2014, 07:59:14 PM Last edit: February 09, 2014, 08:47:28 PM by mek300 |
|
The best way to deter ASIC mining from gpu mining is to create competition among ASIC mining manufacturers.
One possible way is to create a new scrypt coin with much reduced N-factor (litecoin is 10?) and have hugh supply of coins in short time span-- like 500 billion in 1 year (dogecoin has 100 billion in 1.5 years) .
So everybody - even ppl without much computer knowledge - will be able to buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and start enjoying mining and owning some "new sparkling computer coin" !!
|
|
|
|
CoinBuzz
|
|
February 09, 2014, 09:05:36 PM |
|
The best way to deter ASIC mining from gpu mining is to create competition among ASIC mining manufacturers.
One possible way is to create a new scrypt coin with much reduced N-factor (litecoin is 10?) and have hugh supply of coins in short time span-- like 500 billion in 1 year (dogecoin has 100 billion in 1.5 years) .
So everybody - even ppl without much computer knowledge - will be able to buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and start enjoying mining and owning some "new sparkling computer coin" !!
Vertcoin (VTC) is somehow similar to that
|
|
|
|
Repool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2014, 09:46:21 PM |
|
i voted yes, if you are currently mining with gpus and you are not mining vertcoin, you are doing yourself and all gpu owners a disservice and putting yourself out of business at the same time.
|
|
|
|
mek300
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2014, 10:03:22 PM |
|
..... If you buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and mine 1,000,000 coins, but they're only worth 0.5 USD, you lost.
People tend to forget history. "May 21st, 2010, Laszlo Hanyecz, a programmer living in Florida, sent 10,000 bitcoin (BTC), the online-only, open source cryptocurrency, to a volunteer in England, who then spent about $25 to order Hanyecz some Papa John's."
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:50:29 PM |
|
..... If you buy a $5 USB ASIC miner and mine 1,000,000 coins, but they're only worth 0.5 USD, you lost.
People tend to forget history. "May 21st, 2010, Laszlo Hanyecz, a programmer living in Florida, sent 10,000 bitcoin (BTC), the online-only, open source cryptocurrency, to a volunteer in England, who then spent about $25 to order Hanyecz some Papa John's." Just because Bitcoin went to the moon doesn't mean all cryptos will. Sometimes being first out of the gate with a new technology is an achilles' heel. But, you are right not all coins will succeed.
|
|
|
|
alximix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 08:38:47 PM |
|
Estimated Next Difficulty: 6,367 (+11.00%)
|
|
|
|
eroxors
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:04:41 PM |
|
too late?
|
|
|
|
Sophokles
|
|
March 20, 2014, 07:25:17 PM |
|
too late?
Yes. Most likely. Unfortunately. All the GPU miners will be pushed out of the scrypt coins. Where will all the hash power go? N-factor scrypt? Or something completely new? This will be interesting.
|
▄▄████████▄▄ ▄▄████████████████▄▄ ▄██████████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████████▄
| ███████████████████▄████▄ █████████████████▄███████ ████████████████▄███████▀ ██████████▄▄███▄██████▀ ████████▄████▄█████▀▀ ██████▄██████████▀ ███▄▄████████████▄ ██▄███████████████ ░▄██████████████▀ ▄█████████████▀ █████████████ ███████████▀ ███████▀▀ | | | .
| | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | . ElonCoin.org | │ | | .
| │ | ████████▄▄███████▄▄ ███████▄████████████▌ ██████▐██▀███████▀▀██ ███████████████████▐█▌ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄ ███▀░▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀ ██████████████▄██████▌ █████▐██▄██████▄████▐ █████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄ ███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀ ███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀ ▄██████▄▀███████▀ ████████▄▀████▀█████▄▄ | . "I could either watch it happen or be a part of it" ▬▬▬▬▬ |
|
|
|
llccool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
March 25, 2014, 08:39:12 AM |
|
必须要改算法,干掉矿机。作者的愿望不就是没有矿机的干预吗?现在矿机来了,算法不改的话,作者会被世人耻笑的
|
|
|
|
crazy987
|
|
March 25, 2014, 09:43:16 AM |
|
Estimated Next Difficulty: 6,367 (+11.00%)
I dont know where you are getting your info:
Litecoin Difficulty: 5,835 Estimated Next Difficulty: 5,426 (-7.02%)Just noticed the date, oops.
|
|
|
|
|
gondel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
|
|
March 25, 2014, 12:00:10 PM |
|
Hi, Here i would defentely vote with YES. Lite coin should change and be asic protected.
BR,
Gondel
|
|
|
|
|