Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 05:37:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: EU nations agree rules on bank bailouts - replay of Cyprus bank crisis  (Read 1729 times)
pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 02:47:05 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2013, 03:09:41 PM by pabloangello
 #1

Looks like Cyprus bank crisis was only the test...

http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/banking-parliament.s4c/

Dreams about bitcoin for $10k dollars not so impossible right now...

So if you are from EU and have more than 100k euro on your account. Better exchange your excess onto crypto currencies.

bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 03:28:06 PM
 #2

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).
pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 03:29:14 PM
 #3

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

Yep it is "ONLY" for bank accounts...

Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074



View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:50:15 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2013, 05:01:13 PM by Carlton Banks
 #4

So these banks are basically insolvent, aren't they. They're just spent the last 18-24 months humming loudly with their fingers in their ears outside the offices of the financial regulators, hoping the people inside will get the message that they have to do something before the whole charade is exposed publicly.

"but these measures aren't ratified until 2016!" Except that they can be brought into effect before then in an "emergency". Cyprus bail-in and Greek capital controls were both such unexpected emergencies that well-connected business people and politicians mysteriously moved huge amounts of money out of the country before the "emergency" "happened".

Vires in numeris
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:55:54 PM
 #5

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

Yep it is "ONLY" for bank accounts...

That was sarcastic.. lol... What I meant to say is that no assets are safe. Be it bank accounts, or be it bullion. Greedy bankers can take anything, as long as the government supports them.

Before the Cyprus haircut, did anyone even thought in their wildest dreams that all their bank balance will be given to the bankers?
pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:56:32 PM
 #6

So these banks are basically insolvent, aren't they. They're just spent the last 18-24 months humming loudly with their fingers in their ears outside the offices of the financial regulators, hoping the people inside will get the message that they have to do something before the whole charade is exposed publicly.

"but these measures aren't ratified until 2016!" Except that they can be brought into effect before then in an "emergency". Cyprus bail-in and Greek capital controls were both such unepxected emergencies that well-connected business people and politicians mysteriously moved huge amounts of money out of the country before the "emergency" "happened".

If they could do it so quick on Cyprus they can do it also same fast in any EU country that has Euro.

deisik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3458
Merit: 1280


English ⬄ Russian Translation Services


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 04:57:13 PM
 #7

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

I wouldn't hope for this. Remember bullion gold and gold coins confiscated after/during the Great Depression in the USA? And you won't be able to hide it because they know you have it...

pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 04:57:55 PM
 #8

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

Yep it is "ONLY" for bank accounts...

That was sarcastic.. lol... What I meant to say is that no assets are safe. Be it bank accounts, or be it bullion. Greedy bankers can take anything, as long as the government supports them.

Before the Cyprus haircut, did anyone even thought in their wildest dreams that all their bank balance will be given to the bankers?

This is way it can be kind of smart to move some of your national fiats into Bitcoin or another altcoins. Couse they can not check how many you have on your wallet addresses.
I am so glad I created new euro account on my Netteler and few days ago got my new Neteller euro mastercard Cheesy

bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:01:27 PM
 #9

I wouldn't hope for this. Remember bullion gold and gold coins confiscated after/during the Great Depression in the USA?

Quite possible.

This is way it can be kind of smart to move some of your national fiats into Bitcoin or another altcoins. Couse they can not check how many you have on your wallet addresses.

The bankers might be greedy, but for sure they are no idiots. If they can't seize your bitcoins, then they will make the possession of the same a criminal offense (talking about an extreme scenario).
pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:03:42 PM
 #10

I wouldn't hope for this. Remember bullion gold and gold coins confiscated after/during the Great Depression in the USA?

Quite possible.

This is way it can be kind of smart to move some of your national fiats into Bitcoin or another altcoins. Couse they can not check how many you have on your wallet addresses.

The bankers might be greedy, but for sure they are no idiots. If they can't seize your bitcoins, then they will make the possession of the same a criminal offense (talking about an extreme scenario).

Extreme moves could couse extreme response from masses. It could couse massive protest that can go out of control. They will make such a move only if they would want to start it. And for what? Hard to say what is on minds of the richest people that rulles this planet.

deisik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3458
Merit: 1280


English ⬄ Russian Translation Services


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 05:05:19 PM
 #11

I wouldn't hope for this. Remember bullion gold and gold coins confiscated after/during the Great Depression in the USA?

Quite possible.

This is way it can be kind of smart to move some of your national fiats into Bitcoin or another altcoins. Couse they can not check how many you have on your wallet addresses.

The bankers might be greedy, but for sure they are no idiots. If they can't seize your bitcoins, then they will make the possession of the same a criminal offense (talking about an extreme scenario).

Nevertheless, bitcoins are easier to hide&hold than gold, so we might actually have a chance to survive and save the wealth. If they would actually try to do something evil to bitcoin and its owners, we could expect many new cryptocurrencies to spring up with stronger anonymity and security features...

bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:09:20 PM
 #12

Extreme moves could couse extreme response from masses. It could couse massive protest that can go out of control. They will make such a move only if they would want to start it. And for what? Hard to say what is on minds of the richest people that rulles this planet.

I would disagree partially. I have seen how easy it is for the government to manipulate the media. The government can turn the public opinion against Bitcoiners, by running media campaigns accusing Bitcoiners of tolerating CP, human trafficking.etc. They can camouflage their campaign against BTC by claiming that it is a campaign against these evils.

What's worrying me is that our population is quite low. Might be less than 100,000. 99% of the rest don't know what a BTC is.
deisik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3458
Merit: 1280


English ⬄ Russian Translation Services


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2013, 05:11:18 PM
 #13

Extreme moves could couse extreme response from masses. It could couse massive protest that can go out of control. They will make such a move only if they would want to start it. And for what? Hard to say what is on minds of the richest people that rulles this planet.

I would disagree partially. I have seen how easy it is for the government to manipulate the media. The government can turn the public opinion against Bitcoiners, by running media campaigns accusing Bitcoiners of tolerating CP, human trafficking.etc. They can camouflage their campaign against BTC by claiming that it is a campaign against these evils.

What's worrying me is that our population is quite low. Might be less than 100,000. 99% of the rest don't know what a BTC is.

If so, then government shouldn't care, neither the rest of population. It would likely cost them more than they could possibly get by...

pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:15:17 PM
 #14

Extreme moves could couse extreme response from masses. It could couse massive protest that can go out of control. They will make such a move only if they would want to start it. And for what? Hard to say what is on minds of the richest people that rulles this planet.

I would disagree partially. I have seen how easy it is for the government to manipulate the media. The government can turn the public opinion against Bitcoiners, by running media campaigns accusing Bitcoiners of tolerating CP, human trafficking.etc. They can camouflage their campaign against BTC by claiming that it is a campaign against these evils.

What's worrying me is that our population is quite low. Might be less than 100,000. 99% of the rest don't know what a BTC is.
Actually you may be right. Bitcoin is still very poorly known and can be easily associated with SilkRoad things. Media could use that. So if so called "THEY" would like to make a move, the best time for them is now.

cr1776
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 1303


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:29:29 PM
 #15

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

Yep it is "ONLY" for bank accounts...

So far.  In the US, Roosevelt made it illegal to own gold, didn't let people withdraw from safety deposit boxes.  With the authoritarian statists, no matter what they say now, eventually they'll want the fruits of your labor and will be happy to use their guns to take them. 

:-)
pabloangello (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:31:31 PM
 #16

I am glad that they are only seizing the bank accounts. At least the real estate and the bullion assets are safe (aren't they?).

Yep it is "ONLY" for bank accounts...

So far.  In the US, Roosevelt made it illegal to own gold, didn't let people withdraw from safety deposit boxes.  With the authoritarian statists, no matter what they say now, eventually they'll want the fruits of your labor and will be happy to use their guns to take them. 

:-)

Mad world..  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N3N1MlvVc4

CoinGeneral
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

The General


View Profile
December 12, 2013, 05:47:38 PM
 #17

Bitcoin $100,000 each not impossible

applelover
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 01:23:34 AM
 #18

I think you guys are misunderstanding the article.  If a bank defaults this new law will hold the large owners and shareholders in the bank responsible, not private citizens with large wealth.
cr1776
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 1303


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 01:29:51 AM
 #19

I think you guys are misunderstanding the article.  If a bank defaults this new law will hold the large owners and shareholders in the bank responsible, not private citizens with large wealth.

It includes them, plus large depositors, like in Cyprus:

Quote
Small depositors will be explicitly excluded from incurring any costs but depositors with more than 100,000 euros ($137,000) could be affected...

So, the lesson here is to make sure you are under $100k Euros.  But like in Cyprus the threat was there for small depositors too until there were huge protests.
pand70
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 01:51:18 AM
 #20

Hoping for a cyprus like bailout for the price to rise is just wrong. Don't forget that the bubble that happened during the cyprus crisis was just that.
A bubble. Only speculators will gain if something like this happens again.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!