I think personally, this Neg trust should be reviewed before its given. Reasons being anyone angered or with insecurity feelings can just Neg the other person. I would suggest the admin reviews all this Neg trust and determine which is really worth giving.
Yeah, tell you what. Why don't you start going through my feedback and start determining which ones are valid and which ones aren't. And then once you give up in 10 minutes, you'll realize how silly your suggestion was. That isn't the job of moderators, nor should it be.
The trust system is far from perfect and could use a lot of improvement--and no, I don't have any good suggestions--but every single one of us has to suck it up and deal with it. And what I see is that it's not DT members who leave the most bullshit feedback; it's the scammers and spammers who do that. They leave retaliatory feedback, and sometimes they make very specific claims that the DT member or whoever has scammed X
BTC, or has had sexual relations with [insert family member here], or whatever.
The issue is that DT feedback carries a lot more weight, and these poor shitposters can have their earnings slashed to zero because of it. And they're so frigging loud and obnoxious when they get tagged. But 99.9% of the time, the tag is on the money.