Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 06:14:48 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Buying 8 BTC w/ $100 MoneyPak  (Read 830 times)
Sh1337
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


Enthusiast


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2011, 06:26:03 PM
 #1

Please post your offer for 8 BTC.

I will ONLY go first if you are a trusted member. I will be able to do this trade in a few hours.

Eating seeds as a pastime activity:
The toxicity of our city.
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480832088
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480832088

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480832088
Reply with quote  #2

1480832088
Report to moderator
Sh1337
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


Enthusiast


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2011, 07:31:32 PM
 #2

Added asking price. $100 is fair, eh?

Eating seeds as a pastime activity:
The toxicity of our city.
DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 07:48:59 PM
 #3



Ill do 8 btc for $100 Moneypak , you must send first and I will need confirm the funds are added. I am listed on the Honest Traders list https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=484.0 multiple times  , here is a recent exchange I did as well https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=36893.0
Sh1337
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


Enthusiast


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2011, 08:03:58 PM
 #4

I have found a competitive rate, at 9.5 BTC for $100 MoneyPak.

I would still do 8 BTC with you, if you went first. (both methods are risky and knowing that the BTC would be finalized and in my account would allow me to pay more)

Eating seeds as a pastime activity:
The toxicity of our city.
DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:06:19 PM
 #5


Sorry I won't go first Smiley

You have my offer if you change your mind just let me know Smiley
Ssoele
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135


There's no place like 127.0.0.1


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:07:40 PM
 #6

Why not use a escrow service?

Did my words move you? Or did they bring you to enlightenment? Feel free to give some ฿ to me: 1DKMAfeDswYf9MFjWxjPCfjEVkgmXvnizo
Want to play some Minefield?
DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:10:43 PM
 #7


Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Smiley


Why not use a escrow service?
Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:20:09 PM
 #8


Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Smiley


Why not use a escrow service?

No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions.

DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:28:33 PM
 #9

It was just  on offer and all of my transaction but one have been others sending first. I get where you coming from Smiley I looked at his last post as well I dont see any successful transaction so for all intensive purposes he is more of a risk then I would be.


Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Smiley


Why not use a escrow service?

No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions.
ffuentes
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


Only a curious passer-by / FirstBits: 13zsc1


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2011, 08:37:39 PM
 #10

With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".

Listen Radio Libre (Electronica) Donate. (click for details).

Chilean peso VS BTC ahora: http://irage.ca/2btc.php?a=1&c=CLP&r=1

My bitcoin address
DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:41:26 PM
 #11


I completely agree  but most the time those are going to be from other Jr members I have transaction with full members and higher so that would seem to me to be a huge wast of time to build those accounts and post that much but then again people have done more to make a few dollars Smiley

With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".
Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 14, 2011, 08:54:38 PM
 #12


I completely agree  but most the time those are going to be from other Jr members I have transaction with full members and higher so that would seem to me to be a huge wast of time to build those accounts and post that much but then again people have done more to make a few dollars Smiley

With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".
We've had people bribe older members to say that they can be trusted. I'm talking in the order of hundreds of dollars, each.

Sh1337
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


Enthusiast


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2011, 01:14:59 AM
 #13


Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Smiley


Why not use a escrow service?

No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions.

Exactly. We can't even trust you! Haha, just kidding, of course.

But yes, you are completely right, anyone can say they are trusted etc.

Eating seeds as a pastime activity:
The toxicity of our city.
DeepImpact
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165


View Profile
August 15, 2011, 03:15:45 AM
 #14



I get your point just as I mentioned that was just an offer still on the table Smiley Haven't seen anyone else willing to take the risk of them sending first Wink
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!