Sh1337 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2011, 06:26:03 PM Last edit: August 14, 2011, 07:31:16 PM by ShaDez |
|
Please post your offer for 8 BTC.
I will ONLY go first if you are a trusted member. I will be able to do this trade in a few hours.
|
|
|
|
Sh1337 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2011, 07:31:32 PM |
|
Added asking price. $100 is fair, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Sh1337 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:03:58 PM |
|
I have found a competitive rate, at 9.5 BTC for $100 MoneyPak.
I would still do 8 BTC with you, if you went first. (both methods are risky and knowing that the BTC would be finalized and in my account would allow me to pay more)
|
|
|
|
DeepImpact
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:06:19 PM |
|
Sorry I won't go first You have my offer if you change your mind just let me know
|
|
|
|
Ssoele
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:07:40 PM |
|
Why not use a escrow service?
|
Did my words move you? Or did they bring you to enlightenment? Feel free to give some ฿ to me: 1DKMAfeDswYf9MFjWxjPCfjEVkgmXvnizo Want to play some Minefield?
|
|
|
DeepImpact
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:10:43 PM |
|
Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Why not use a escrow service?
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:20:09 PM |
|
Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Why not use a escrow service?
No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions.
|
|
|
|
DeepImpact
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:28:33 PM |
|
It was just on offer and all of my transaction but one have been others sending first. I get where you coming from I looked at his last post as well I dont see any successful transaction so for all intensive purposes he is more of a risk then I would be. Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Why not use a escrow service?
No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions.
|
|
|
|
ffuentes
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Only a curious passer-by / FirstBits: 13zsc1
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:37:39 PM |
|
With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".
|
|
|
|
DeepImpact
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:41:26 PM |
|
I completely agree but most the time those are going to be from other Jr members I have transaction with full members and higher so that would seem to me to be a huge wast of time to build those accounts and post that much but then again people have done more to make a few dollars With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 14, 2011, 08:54:38 PM |
|
I completely agree but most the time those are going to be from other Jr members I have transaction with full members and higher so that would seem to me to be a huge wast of time to build those accounts and post that much but then again people have done more to make a few dollars With a twisted mind I could do fake transactions to get "reputation".
We've had people bribe older members to say that they can be trusted. I'm talking in the order of hundreds of dollars, each.
|
|
|
|
Sh1337 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2011, 01:14:59 AM |
|
Because I have enough rep on here to ask for someone to send first without paying escrow a portion of it for this transaction Why not use a escrow service?
No, you don't. Rep takes time to build, not just multiple transactions. Exactly. We can't even trust you! Haha, just kidding, of course. But yes, you are completely right, anyone can say they are trusted etc.
|
|
|
|
DeepImpact
|
|
August 15, 2011, 03:15:45 AM |
|
I get your point just as I mentioned that was just an offer still on the table Haven't seen anyone else willing to take the risk of them sending first
|
|
|
|
|