Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 06:19:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [FUD] China prohibits banks providing settlement services to Bitcoin Exchange  (Read 18532 times)
lclc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 275


Bitcoin Association Switzerland


View Profile WWW
December 17, 2013, 08:05:43 AM
 #81

Are you Chinese chsados?

So all it says that
1) Businesses aren't allowed to accept Bitcoins (we knew that before)
2) You can't use the Chinese Paypals anymore to fund your account
3) You still can deposit and withdrawal to BTCN etc.

I don't see a big problem here.

AussieBTC
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 09:43:24 AM
 #82


Guys just copy and paste this to google translator and you will figure it out what they are talking about.

nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 09:53:34 AM
 #83

So... I'm usually news agnostic as it makes very little difference to me in the short run (I'm in it for the long run), and thus I don't keep myself up to date or attentive at all but this seems too obvious to be a coincidence;

- China says "bitcoin probably alright", price jumps ten fold
- China decides they're through buying USD (read it somewhere, might have read it wrong)
- China says "bitcoin is somewhat illegal, you have a short timespan to get out", everyone sells, price drops

Now, if it was me I would say 'China says' is a great market direction trigger, and if I were China (govmnt) I would buy as it drops (sure, it's illegal... for the common people) and then by CNY say "good news, bitcoin's probably alright again", thus re-inflating all the coins bought cheap.

Is it not just a tad bit too obvious?
Omega2513
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:35:10 PM
 #84

So... I'm usually news agnostic as it makes very little difference to me in the short run (I'm in it for the long run), and thus I don't keep myself up to date or attentive at all but this seems too obvious to be a coincidence;

- China says "bitcoin probably alright", price jumps ten fold
- China decides they're through buying USD (read it somewhere, might have read it wrong)
- China says "bitcoin is somewhat illegal, you have a short timespan to get out", everyone sells, price drops

Now, if it was me I would say 'China says' is a great market direction trigger, and if I were China (govmnt) I would buy as it drops (sure, it's illegal... for the common people) and then by CNY say "good news, bitcoin's probably alright again", thus re-inflating all the coins bought cheap.

Is it not just a tad bit too obvious?
Those crafty chinese. Well we'll see where it goes. Right now BTC-e is at $662 and Gox is at $722
accord01
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 12:35:05 AM
 #85

I knew this probably wasn't FUD.  What tipped me off was someone selling 5k coins at market like 1 hour before this post.
mmeijeri
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500

Martijn Meijering


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 09:34:25 AM
 #86

Can we remove the [FUD] marker from the thread title? And be a little bit less eager next time to scream FUD!!! before we have solid information?

ROI is not a verb, the term you're looking for is 'to break even'.
levino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 252


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 09:43:22 AM
 #87

Can we remove the [FUD] marker from the thread title? And be a little bit less eager next time to scream FUD!!! before we have solid information?

Yes. I agree very much.

BM-2cWwQnMzK9XFTjfn6jSRRJwTG8a2wooR9A
www.coyno.com - www.bitcoinage.de
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 10:30:25 AM
 #88

Can we remove the [FUD] marker from the thread title? And be a little bit less eager next time to scream FUD!!! before we have solid information?

Yes. I agree very much.

You can still withdraw RMB from bitcoin exchanges in China so the title is still *wrong* as stands.

If the OP wants to get the FUD removed then they should change the word "settlements" to "deposits".

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
levino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 252


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 10:49:39 AM
 #89

You can still withdraw RMB from bitcoin exchanges in China so the title is still *wrong* as stands.

If the OP wants to get the FUD removed then they should change the word "settlements" to "deposits".


This is abuse of power. That is why Bitcoin was invented in the first place. To stop people like you who think they are above others.

BM-2cWwQnMzK9XFTjfn6jSRRJwTG8a2wooR9A
www.coyno.com - www.bitcoinage.de
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 11:00:07 AM
 #90

You can still withdraw RMB from bitcoin exchanges in China so the title is still *wrong* as stands.

If the OP wants to get the FUD removed then they should change the word "settlements" to "deposits".


This is abuse of power. That is why Bitcoin was invented in the first place. To stop people like you who think they are above others.

I am not a moderator nor do I have any influence on what the mods decide or not decide to do.

The title of the OP is *factually incorrect* as it currently stands (as you *can* withdraw RMB from btcchina and okcoin right now) - so my point was if you think it is fair enough to remove the [FUD] then I also think it would be "fair enough to remove the FUD".

I am not "above you" but I think I might make more sense than you do (as you are the one calling to have the [FUD] prefix removed whilst leaving the actual FUD in place). Cheesy

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
Michael_S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 251


Bitcoin-Note-and-Voucher-Printing-Empowerer


View Profile
December 19, 2013, 01:36:42 PM
 #91

So what's bitcoin's future in China?

China did not ban bitcoin as such, but just certain businesses.

I think the way how people in China can buy & sell bitcoin in the future, should today's bitcoin exchanges become non-operational for legal reasons, is to do it via an escrow platform like the european "bitcoin.de" - there is never any fiat money flowing to or from bitcoin.de.

This mode may look strange for those of you only familiar with "traditional" modes of exchanges, but bitcoin.de is in fact the second largest EUR/BTC market behind MtGox (http://bitcoinwatch.com), and it is very usable as long as you only trade from time to time and not several times a day.

It works like this:
- Buyer and seller open a web account at bitcoin.de.
- A seller transfers some bitcoins to his online wallet at bitcoin.de.
- A seller can place a limit order for some bitcoins he wants to sell, or directly accept a buy offer from someone else.
- A buyer can place a limit order for some bitcoins he wants to buy, or directly accept a sell offer from someone else.
- If a deal is made, the seller's bitcoins get "frozen", and both buyer and seller receive an email
  from bitcoin.de (and have it shown in the web browser):
  - The buyer is requested to send xxx.xx units of fiat currency directly to the fiat bank account of the seller,
     with a unique code in the reference field. He has to do so within [12/18/24] hours (adjusted by bitcoin.de
     based on market volatility). He has to indicate in the bitcoin.de system that he has triggered the transfer
     as soon as he has done so.
  - The seller is asked to check his bank account and confirm reception of the fiat transfer at bitcoin.de.
- When the seller confirms receipt of the fiat money, bitcoin.de will transfer the (frozen) bitcoins to the buyer's online wallet
  and the deal is concluded.

If the buyer does not transfer the fiat money within the [12/18/24] h period, he'll get a negative rating and the deal gets cancelled.
Otherwise, buyers and sellers are asked to rate each other after the deal.
Acc. to the rating system there are gold, silver and bronze users, and everyone is free to accept only users of a certain rating class. Also a personal white/blacklisting is possible.

How does bitcoin.de take commissions?
bitcoin.de takes 1% commission for each deal, so both buyer and seller contribute 0.5% (actually, from the buyer's point of view it looks like 0.50505%, see example below). It works like this example:
- Assume that the deal is about 1 BTC for 1000 fiat currency units.
- The buyer is requested to pay 995 fiat currency units to the seller (1000 - 0.5%).
- From the seller's 1 BTC, 0.01 BTC (1%) go to bitcoin.de as commission, and 0.99 BTC (1 BTC - 1%) go to the buyer.

So the deal looks like this:
- From buyer point of view, he got 0.99 BTC for 995 currency units (so he paid a price of 1005.05 fiat units per BTC (5.05% fee)
- From seller point of view: He sold 1 BTC for 995 currency units (so he sold for a rate of 995 fiat units/BTC (5.00% fee)
- From bitcoin.de point of view: They earned 0.01 BTC commission for a 1 BTC deal (1%)

Fraud prevention:
It has happened in the past that fraudulent buyers transfer the fiat money from a stolen (not their own) bank account for example by filling out money paper transfer forms from any bank and falsify the signature (banks normally do not check the hand-written signature). The seller received the money and acknowledged it and the bitcoins were credited to the buyer by bitcoin.de. Later, the fraud was detected by the 3rd person whose bank account was mis-used without his knowledge, and the fiat money transfer was reverted by the involved banks. Now the seller was left with having neither bitcoins nor fiat money.
Today bitcoin.de prevents this fraud attack by telling the seller the bank account details of the buyer! So the seller shall check if the incoming payment really origins from the correct bank account (which was formerly verified by bitcoin.de). Note that some banks do and some banks do not give their customer the information of the bank account number of the sending side for an incoming payment.

Dispute handling:
In very rare cases it may happen that the buyer says that he has transferred the money while the seller says he has never received any fiat payment, i.e. one of the two is lying. In this case bitcoin.de has to ask for proofs (scans of bank statements etc.) from both parties, or even for an authorisation to query the bank directly with regard to the particular payment. Then bitcoin.de has do decide who is telling the truth and whether or not to transfer the bitcoins from seller's to buyer's online wallet.


-->
I think that a web service like bitcoin.de can be readily established for the Chinese market, either within China (if legal - maybe the new operational model of btcchina?), or otherwise in Taiwan or any other country. For this service the platform does not need to reside in China, since no fiat money transfer happens between users and this platform.

The advantages and disadvantages of this model:
(-) A little more complicated for the user
(+) User does not need to "pre-pay" fiat currency to the exchange
(-) Automated frequent intra day trading not possible - all trading requires *human* interaction
(+) The previous point also has it's pros because market manipulations by the exchange (who may exploit insider knowledge of the order book) or "stop loss avalanches" are avoided, potentially yielding more stable exchange rates...
(+) This mode does not require fiat money flows between user and the platform, so it could well reside outside China, as long as it is trusted not to embezzle online wallets' bitcoins and as long as it is trusted to do good escrow service on the users' bitcoins funds.

So the future is not as dark as one may think.

Does this make sense what I wrote here?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!