Does the system allow you to send merit to yourself?

[Don Pedro Dinero]

If so, I think it would be better to change it. I suppose this is not a big deal, because someone sending merit to himself would run out of merits soon and would also be negatively trusted. But I think it would be better if this wasn’t allowed.

[mdayonliner]

If so, I think it would be better to change it.

It does not. Once you try the request it ends up showing...

Click here if unable to see image

The way some of the merit abusers are abusing merit, if it was possible, by now you would end up saying a->a thousands of times if not millions  

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Ok, I haven't tried because I was thinking I could be negatively trusted or something.

[InvoKing]

This was tested from first minutes, it is a human stuff to reward yourself first before everyone else
Please lock the topic since you already received the answer from mdayonliner.

[BUK2016]

Before you open this thread you should have it to see whether it will work or have an evidence of who must have done such before, but I can see that someone has already provided a very good answer to your question and am sure that will be okay with you. 

[jackg]

If so, I think it would be better to change it.

It does not. Once you try the request it ends up showing...

Click here if unable to see image

The way some of the merit abusers are abusing merit, if it was possible, by now you would end up saying a->a thousands of times if not millions 

It's good that limit was put into place. If one person had say 100 sMerit, they could merit themselves around 197 merits before they ran out of those merit as each merit is worth a half of the previous merit.

Before you open this thread you should have it to see whether it will work or have an evidence of who must have done such before.

Does Yahoo even screen people before allowing them to advertise his signature, literally have no idea what that bit means (I've seen quite a few users with that signature that post stuff that just doesn't seem to make sense to me).

[r1s2g3]

If so, I think it would be better to change it.

It does not. Once you try the request it ends up showing...

Click here if unable to see image

The way some of the merit abusers are abusing merit, if it was possible, by now you would end up saying a->a thousands of times if not millions  

Thanks OP, Actually I have that same question in my mind.
@mdayonliner , you are brave to test it , I never thought in my dreams to test this. If in case this is bug (you can give merit to yourself)  the next thing I imagine a loads of red trust.

[mahimonliner]

It's good that limit was put into place. If one person had say 100 sMerit, they could merit themselves around 197 merits before they ran out of those merit as each merit is worth a half of the previous merit.

The power of merit farming LOL

---------	---------
100	=> 100
50	=> 150
25	=> 175
12 (0.5)	=> 187
6 (0.5)	=> 193
3 (0.5)	=> 196
2	=> 198
1	=> 199
(0.5)	=> 199
---------	---------

Hey! you got it wrong but close enough  

[TheGodson]

It's good that limit was put into place. If one person had say 100 sMerit, they could merit themselves around 197 merits before they ran out of those merit as each merit is worth a half of the previous merit.

The power of merit farming LOL

---------	---------
100	=> 100
50	=> 150
25	=> 175
12 (0.5)	=> 187
6 (0.5)	=> 193
3 (0.5)	=> 196
2	=> 198
1	=> 199
(0.5)	=> 199
---------	---------

Hey! you got it wrong but close enough 

Half of 25 is 12.5 where you chose to round down. Later on you take half of three which is 1.5. At this point you chose to round up.

If you are rounding up all the time you get 202. If you round down all the time you get 197. I think it rounds down but I'm not too sure. I think OP is right about 197.

[tranthidung]

If I remember exactly, Theymos stated about this issue in the ANN topic of merit ystem, which has title "Merit system and new rank requirements".
Sorry, I have checked the topic, which has not mentioned about this. But I believe that I read it somewhere.
By the way, Theymos should add the basic information about the operational mechanism  of merit system to the OP of the topic for newcomers.

[jackg]

It's good that limit was put into place. If one person had say 100 sMerit, they could merit themselves around 197 merits before they ran out of those merit as each merit is worth a half of the previous merit.

The power of merit farming LOL

---------	---------
100	=> 100
50	=> 150
25	=> 175
12 (0.5)	=> 187
6 (0.5)	=> 193
3 (0.5)	=> 196
2	=> 198
1	=> 199
(0.5)	=> 199
---------	---------

Hey! you got it wrong but close enough 

Like godson said. How is half of 3.5 ever going to be 2.
And 12.5/2=6.5 huh?
It's definitely 197.

[r1s2g3]

It's good that limit was put into place. If one person had say 100 sMerit, they could merit themselves around 197 merits before they ran out of those merit as each merit is worth a half of the previous merit.

The power of merit farming LOL

---------	---------
100	=> 100
50	=> 150
25	=> 175
12 (0.5 Extra Merit/or 1 s Merit  that cannot be divided)	=> 187
6 (0.5 Extra Merit/or 1 s Merit  that cannot be divided)	=> 193
3 (0.5 Extra Merit/or 1 s Merit  that cannot be divided)	=> 196
1 (but division of 3/2 yielded one more .5 and we have already extra .5) so you get 1 more here	=> 198
1	=> 199
(0.5)	=> 199
---------	---------

Hey! you got it wrong but close enough 

Like godson said. How is half of 3.5 ever going to be 2.
And 12.5/2=6.5 huh?
It's definitely 197.

Calculation of 199 is definitely correct and I edited it to show you how it is correct.
Actually it is Geometric Progression with first term as 100 and common ratio as 1/2
and we are calculating the sum till 8^th term

100  50 25 12.5  6.25  3.125  1.562   .78 (.78 is the 8^th term and less than 1, so not good for calculation going ahead.)

But here the actual calculation took  place like, not following the exact GP series.

100 + 50 + 25+ floor[25/2] + floor[13/2] + floor[7/2] + floor[4/2] + floor[2/2]
100  +50 +25+ 12                +6               + 3             + 2              + 1             = 199

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Locking this thread because latest discussion has nothing to do with what I asked and my question has already been answered.