TonyOliver
|
|
December 22, 2013, 05:53:43 PM |
|
With a traditional computer that is essentially true - but couldn't a quantum computer perform an infinite amount of computations in a finite time? Or have I misunderstood the principle of quantum computing. I wouldn't put it past the NSA having this technology. Alternatively they may have a back door into the current encryption method - which is probably worth more to them not to reveal.
|
|
|
|
rarkenin
|
|
December 22, 2013, 05:58:39 PM |
|
For quantum computing, not true. It can still only do finite work depending on the computer's design, and there still aren't large enugh quantum computers to do SHA256 and mining.
As for SHA being broken, SHA is nothing like Skipjack. It got independently validated.
|
|
|
|
CoinCidental
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
December 22, 2013, 06:15:06 PM Last edit: December 22, 2013, 06:43:00 PM by CoinCidental |
|
DPR will not get released if he refuses to give up the rest of the coins or the passwords to the wallets already seized i dont think hes in much of a position to haggle with the 5 or 6 murder charges they tacked on as well as everything else the judge will not let him come out to 500,000+ btc that would be like a bank robber getting to keep the stolen money to enjoy when he gets out
|
|
|
|
bonker
|
|
December 22, 2013, 06:28:27 PM |
|
The recent China dump was a deliberate act of market manipulation by the Chinks to lower BTC price and allow China to add to its reserves... FACT!
Any country lumbered with USD will be unofficially buying BTC
|
|
|
|
quone17
|
|
December 22, 2013, 07:12:23 PM |
|
I'd actually think it would be the later countries, the ones with a lot of money and "spare" cash, who might already be accumulating bitcoin just in case. I know that china doesn't have to divulge what their assets are but I think the fed has to, don't they?
|
|
|
|
smoothrunnings
|
|
December 22, 2013, 08:56:20 PM |
|
The recent China dump was a deliberate act of market manipulation by the Chinks to lower BTC price and allow China to add to its reserves... FACT!
Any country lumbered with USD will be unofficially buying BTC
You need to get your facts straight. China simply wanted to keep bitcoin separate from the banks and their fiat currency. When you put your fiat money do you really know what happens to it? Do you know the long-term damage that is caused to the government and the banking system when you take your fiat money out and put it into a digital currency like bitcoin? It doesn't sound like you do otherwise you wouldn't be making this accusations about China. Banks aren't going to go down without a fight, expect to see more of this around the world and at the same time the media outlets reporting as they want you to see it an hear it but not what really is going on. This is why I don't rarely watch the news on the TV, and see why now with the control the media has over people like yourself why the "wealthy" not the "rich" are raised without a TV.
|
|
|
|
TonyOliver
|
|
December 22, 2013, 10:55:39 PM |
|
The recent China dump was a deliberate act of market manipulation by the Chinks to lower BTC price and allow China to add to its reserves... FACT!
Any country lumbered with USD will be unofficially buying BTC
You need to get your facts straight. China simply wanted to keep bitcoin separate from the banks and their fiat currency. When you put your fiat money do you really know what happens to it? Do you know the long-term damage that is caused to the government and the banking system when you take your fiat money out and put it into a digital currency like bitcoin? It doesn't sound like you do otherwise you wouldn't be making this accusations about China. Banks aren't going to go down without a fight, expect to see more of this around the world and at the same time the media outlets reporting as they want you to see it an hear it but not what really is going on. This is why I don't rarely watch the news on the TV, and see why now with the control the media has over people like yourself why the "wealthy" not the "rich" are raised without a TV. I agree that China has a lot more to lose from allowing bitcoins in the mainstream as they threaten the very fabric of the governments control structure. However, that doesn't mean they aren't hedging their bets. Who wouldn't?
|
|
|
|
leopard2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014
|
|
December 23, 2013, 12:39:12 AM |
|
I would not be surprised at all if Chinese govt is diverting some of their USD holdings into BTC as we speak, at cheap prices of course, under 600 After that they will permit moderate BTC business in China again. This will result in 1000+ BTC which would mean that stupid bears have sent their USD straight to China
|
Truth is the new hatespeech.
|
|
|
TonyOliver
|
|
December 23, 2013, 01:16:06 AM |
|
I wonder if there is any animosity regarding the fact the creator has a Japanese name - they aren't the best of friends the Chinese and Japanese.
|
|
|
|
cdog
|
|
December 23, 2013, 02:00:47 AM |
|
I wonder if there is any animosity regarding the fact the creator has a Japanese name - they aren't the best of friends the Chinese and Japanese.
With a traditional computer that is essentially true - but couldn't a quantum computer perform an infinite amount of computations in a finite time? Or have I misunderstood the principle of quantum computing. I wouldn't put it past the NSA having this technology. Alternatively they may have a back door into the current encryption method - which is probably worth more to them not to reveal.
OK, welcome to the forums glad you made it. So please dont take this the wrong way: You need to read more on here (lurk) and use the search function before you start posting these brain farts of yours all over the place. All of these points you mentioned have been discussed ad nauseam on BTCTalk. By people with IQs much higher than you or me. BTCTalk is a great place to learn and remember what being a student is like: Be quiet in class, listen carefully to the teachers and smart kids and DO YOUR HOMEWORK!
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
December 23, 2013, 03:18:17 AM |
|
lol it's not 1.5% but it is a lot I thought it was something like 240,000 BTC from what I saw on articles, definitely a lot but the problem is they haven't been able to access most of it because the wallet is passworded.
lol - like the NSA have no idea how to crack passwords If you have a password like this ( https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm) it will take the NSA an infinite amount of time to crack it. Enjoy! Well he wasn't very smart in several areas, that was clear, so I doubt his password was "all that"
|
|
|
|
bonker
|
|
December 23, 2013, 08:22:04 AM |
|
The recent China dump was a deliberate act of market manipulation by the Chinks to lower BTC price and allow China to add to its reserves... FACT!
Any country lumbered with USD will be unofficially buying BTC
You need to get your facts straight. China simply wanted to keep bitcoin separate from the banks and their fiat currency. When you put your fiat money do you really know what happens to it? Do you know the long-term damage that is caused to the government and the banking system when you take your fiat money out and put it into a digital currency like bitcoin? It doesn't sound like you do otherwise you wouldn't be making this accusations about China. Banks aren't going to go down without a fight, expect to see more of this around the world and at the same time the media outlets reporting as they want you to see it an hear it but not what really is going on. This is why I don't rarely watch the news on the TV, and see why now with the control the media has over people like yourself why the "wealthy" not the "rich" are raised without a TV. Sorry buddy, could you re-phrase this rambling gibberish into a succinct and coherent arguement? I restate: The Chinks deliberately manipulated the Bitcoin market recently so they could add it to their reserves... still a FACT!
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinpro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 23, 2013, 09:56:20 AM |
|
why would they need too
|
WWW.FACEBOOK.COM
CRYPTOCURRENCY CENTRAL BANK
LTC: LP7bcFENVL9vdmUVea1M6FMyjSmUfsMVYf
|
|
|
CoinCidental
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
December 23, 2013, 10:54:30 AM |
|
The recent China dump was a deliberate act of market manipulation by the Chinks to lower BTC price and allow China to add to its reserves... FACT!
Any country lumbered with USD will be unofficially buying BTC
You need to get your facts straight. China simply wanted to keep bitcoin separate from the banks and their fiat currency. When you put your fiat money do you really know what happens to it? Do you know the long-term damage that is caused to the government and the banking system when you take your fiat money out and put it into a digital currency like bitcoin? It doesn't sound like you do otherwise you wouldn't be making this accusations about China. Banks aren't going to go down without a fight, expect to see more of this around the world and at the same time the media outlets reporting as they want you to see it an hear it but not what really is going on. This is why I don't rarely watch the news on the TV, and see why now with the control the media has over people like yourself why the "wealthy" not the "rich" are raised without a TV. Sorry buddy, could you re-phrase this rambling gibberish into a succinct and coherent arguement? I restate: The Chinks deliberately manipulated the Bitcoin market recently so they could add it to their reserves... still a FACT! the chinese goverment could buy every coin in the exchanges if they wanted to the fed is not the only one who can print shitloads of cash with nothing behind it lol there would be no need to crash the price to get it cheaper for the likes of the chinese govt
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 23, 2013, 11:04:04 AM |
|
One could argue the USA already has a substantial amount of BTC @ the FBI.
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
December 23, 2013, 11:16:42 AM |
|
One could argue the USA already has a substantial amount of BTC @ the FBI.
Already made that point earlier in the thread
|
|
|
|
CoinCidental
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
December 23, 2013, 11:33:18 AM |
|
One could argue the USA already has a substantial amount of BTC @ the FBI.
+ pirate@40 surely will have his coins confiscated when he gets to court for the BTCST thats a very sustancial number cominbined with the missing silk rd wallets if DPR ever gives them up
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
December 23, 2013, 02:28:32 PM |
|
One could argue the USA already has a substantial amount of BTC @ the FBI.
+ pirate@40 surely will have his coins confiscated when he gets to court for the BTCST thats a very sustancial number cominbined with the missing silk rd wallets if DPR ever gives them up probably get waterboarded for them. nobody can stand that
|
|
|
|
CoinCidental
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
December 23, 2013, 03:27:28 PM |
|
One could argue the USA already has a substantial amount of BTC @ the FBI.
+ pirate@40 surely will have his coins confiscated when he gets to court for the BTCST thats a very sustancial number cominbined with the missing silk rd wallets if DPR ever gives them up probably get waterboarded for them. nobody can stand that would not be a bit surprised if they throw him in a really hardcore prison where stuff like beatings or gangrape happens daily until he gives the coins up and gets moved somewhere with a bit more protection ........ if i were him id probably give them the coins but as soon as he does that hes lost his only bargaining chips its a tough decision ..... theyre going to throw the book at him anyway for making them look silly for all the years they were unable to catch him
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
December 23, 2013, 07:41:59 PM |
|
+ pirate@40 surely will have his coins confiscated when he gets to court for the BTCST
Alas, it appears that BTCST was a bitcoin-denominated Ponzi. As such, new investment was rolled into 'profits' for older investors. Consequently, little if any XBT is likely to remain. I wish it were otherwise - I'd be ecstatic with even pennies on the dollar.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
|