[ANN][MOON] Mooncoin: You know where it's headed! KGW exploit FIXED 4/3/2014

[agswinner]

Goldrake 

[1714293215]

1714293215

[1714293215]

1714293215

[1714293215]

1714293215

[1714293215]

1714293215

[Last Call]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon     

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

[coinflow]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon    

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

This is the problematic address, that belongs to a miner, who is cheating with a script, mining only the big rewarded blocks, by tuning in with big hashing power only for those. This is the reason, why we need to make the change to static/fixed block rewards. At the moment Mooncoin still has a random reward-scheme.

moonchain.net can display ALL transactions of addresses, but it nearly takes forever for addresses with so many single transactions. Probably the power of the server should be upgraded.
You can check here, as an alternative, but it only shows the last 1000 transactions (which is standard for a normal ABE-installation, too): http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=MOON&address=2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8
Hence it doesn't put such a heavy load on the server, like showing all of the ~198000 tx's of that address, as moonchain.net tries to do.

[obivion6]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon    

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

This is the problematic address, that belongs to a miner, who is cheating with a script, mining only the big rewarded blocks, by tuning in with big hashing power only for those. This is the reason, why we need to make the change to static/fixed block rewards. At the moment Mooncoin still has a random reward-scheme.

moonchain.net can display ALL transactions of addresses, but it nearly takes forever for addresses with so many single transactions. Probably the power of the server should be upgraded.
You can check here, as an alternative, but it only shows the last 1000 transactions (which is standard for a normal ABE-installation, too): http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=MOON&address=2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8
Hence it doesn't put such a heavy load on the server, like showing all of the ~198000 tx's of that address, as moonchain.net tries to do.

where is Peme with the new wallet??? i thought this was fixed??

[peme]

It has come to my attention, that I have posted some possibly dangerous config-settings (link to your posting) previously.
It originally showed the line server=1 without explaining, that if you use this setting, you must secure your system by using rpcuser=username and rpcpassword=verysecurepassward also. Furthermore you should use rpcallowip, in order to only grant wallet-access via the RPC-interface to certain IP-addresses (e.g.: rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 to only allow access from the same computer). If you don't know what this is all about, the best advice is, to simply delete all lines in the mooncoin.conf other than addnode=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.

I have now removed the possibly dangerous lines (since they are absolutely not necessary for a standard-installation) and will search for other postings here in this thread, that also show this possible dangerous setting (I have found one already). I'll try to contact the authors to remove that, too.

Please check, if you have the possibly dangerous setting in your mooncoin.conf, too (maybe by simply copying and pasting it) and change that.
You can find mooncoin.conf at C:\Users\YourUsername\AppData\Roaming\Mooncoin

As this is critical, please do check that as soon as possible, because it has also come to my attention, that this possible vulnerability in the settings is already being exploited - with the result of coins being transferred out of your wallet and no chance to get them back.

If you did not change your installation manually and/or don't see the file mooncoin.conf in your Mooncoin-folder, then this does not apply to you. Only installations with added mooncoin.conf, including "server=1" and the missing - but necessary - credentials to secure the wallet from unrestricted external access, are affected.

If you have questions regarding this, please post them. I'll answer as soon as possible.

Please keep in mind, that this is no problem with the wallet as such. It originates from a dangerous setting in a manually added config-file to the standard-installation.

[coinflow]

Btw: The above advice applies to many other - if not all - coins also.
There are many "sample-configs" in the forums, that get copied and pasted without thinking and knowing, what the settings are about. And sample-settings like username=any / password=somepassword obviously aren't very secure, if not changed/replaced by safe ones. All this will most probably only affect people who use their wallets to solo-mine into it directly, because you need an RPC-connection for that. But better safe than sorry, if you - for example - simply copied and pasted a configuration for adding peers, to make your wallet connect (faster) and also copied the not necessary lines, without knowing, what they do to your system.

[mrben77]

name of coin is so cool , but scrypt is not good for VGA now , so sad

[coinflow]

name of coin is so cool , but scrypt is not good for VGA now , so sad

Have you tried one of the pools? There are other smaller miners, too:
http://mooncoin.rocks/official-pool-list

See here, for example: http://moon.bitember.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

[redjedievolution]

I moved 2 billions out of cryptsy right now. 

[agswinner]

Barbarian speculator in action ....

[perrie454]

where is this mooncoin going ???moon is not that way c'mon mooncoiners let's show some love  

[agswinner]

20 <----------->40 <------------>60<----------->90. Gann level


we do not have a professional tol to calculate fibbonacci retracement levels, so I rely on the gann's theory

Correction and buy opportunity  20 sup 40 resistance

[redjedievolution]

the moment of your life to buy 

[agswinner]

@MooncoinItalia: Buy opportunity now!

[Barney]

mooncoin traders:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ58RFKwSfw

[coinflow]

mooncoin traders:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ58RFKwSfw

No, not really. 

[redjedievolution]

transparent trader, are you going to buy more again?

[JimHendrix]

LMAO at Moon dump!
I told ya so

mooncoin traders:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ58RFKwSfw

[JimHendrix]

If MOON hits 11-10 Litoshis or lower, then I'll throw a few Litecoins at it.

transparent trader, are you going to buy more again?

[Barney]

If MOON hits 11-10 Litoshis or lower, then I'll throw a few Litecoins at it.

Yea, could be nice dead cat bounce.