Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 08:55:05 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Estimate of all cards' Hash/s :) also shows best hash/$  (Read 43307 times)
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126



View Profile
February 26, 2011, 12:01:31 PM
 #1

The prices are a tiny bit outdated, but gives you a great idea!
http://golubev.com/gpuest.htm

take the MD5 number and multiply it by 62.63 seems to work well for the 5XXX and 6XXX series, but for the rest, it just gives you an idea in proportion. I'm guessing each series of cards have a number like the 62.63.

another one with a lot less cards is http://pastebin.com/AvymGnMJ

you can then put it here for your average time etc: http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php


167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
1480971305
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480971305

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480971305
Reply with quote  #2

1480971305
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
February 26, 2011, 03:10:21 PM
 #2

Anyone have the 6950 and 6970 MHash data?

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
LMGTFY
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644



View Profile
February 26, 2011, 03:21:21 PM
 #3

Anyone have the 6950 and 6970 MHash data?
You can infer it from the MD5 data:
...take the MD5 number and multiply it by 62.63 seems to work well for the 5XXX and 6XXX series, but for the rest, it just gives you an idea in proportion. I'm guessing each series of cards have a number like the 62.63.
It looks like the 6950 should be slightly under the 5870, i.e. you won't get 313 Mhash/s, but you won't be too far off. The 6970 should be slightly better than the 5870.

This space intentionally left blank.
Quip
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
February 26, 2011, 03:32:35 PM
 #4

Anyone have the 6950 and 6970 MHash data?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison

A little less than twice as fast as a 6850 and 6870.

1NEEFwHjXDhbLZ2RxM6qSDnNDByNZYCSKf

LVBX is down indefinitely, so use CoinPal. Sorry.
SmokeTooMuch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 873


View Profile
February 26, 2011, 03:48:31 PM
 #5

Quote
Model    Mhash/s    Mhash/W    W    Clock    SP    SDK    Miner    Notes
4870    90.36    0.602    150    750    800    2.1

Where is that data from ?
Just want to see how to optimze parameters for my 4870.

Date Registered: 2009-12-10 | I'm using GPG, pm me for my public key. | Bitcoin on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc
You like what I'm doing? Why don't you send me a coin: 17Pj8jpUgY6qTaKgiopL5U48zxU4rTrkuB
Grinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1269


View Profile
February 26, 2011, 04:41:58 PM
 #6

Anyone have the 6950 and 6970 MHash data?
With an unlocked firmware on a 6950 I get ~292 Mhash at 800 MHz and ~321 Mhash at 880 MHz, both with -f 20 and poclbm. When I'm at home I usually run it at 850 MHz to avoid too much fan noise, and when I'm away I run it at 915 MHz (~336 Mhash).
pla
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


View Profile
February 26, 2011, 05:29:54 PM
 #7

Not to self-promote, but if you find it interesting, I just posted a table of all the currently-available Radeons, with prices (looked up personally at NewEgg about an hour ago) and assorted derived stats in another thread:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3814.msg55620#msg55620

I don't beg - If I do something to deserve your BTC, you can find my address on the invoice.  Wink
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126



View Profile
February 27, 2011, 08:10:16 AM
 #8

Not to self-promote, but if you find it interesting, I just posted a table of all the currently-available Radeons, with prices (looked up personally at NewEgg about an hour ago) and assorted derived stats in another thread:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3814.msg55620#msg55620

self-promote away, this is to help people estimate Mhash/s

with -v -w 128 -f 0 and 1040 core 300 mem, I get 278~280 Mhash/s on a 6870. yes, 6870.

keep in mind that in games 975 core BSODs, let alone 1040, so don'
t be affraid to OC specifically for mining. At stock I get 229~234Mhash/s

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
Xerol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
February 27, 2011, 09:02:49 AM
 #9

Either the conversion factor for the 46xx series is off, or something's messed up with my miner config. I'm only getting 27mhash on my 4670, and 3 different lists are putting it around 37.
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126



View Profile
February 27, 2011, 10:08:48 AM
 #10

Either the conversion factor for the 46xx series is off, or something's messed up with my miner config. I'm only getting 27mhash on my 4670, and 3 different lists are putting it around 37.

did you use -w 132 -f 0 or similar? f should be 30 or less for best performance. Also check GPU usage and clocks

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
niooron
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190


View Profile
February 27, 2011, 09:13:50 PM
 #11

For 4670 you need to use -w 32 and no vectors.

14dxwuQwkQiLbZjJFfciZ26xSGdRU5mKEp
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126



View Profile
February 28, 2011, 01:24:04 AM
 #12

For 4670 you need to use -w 32 and no vectors.

^ sorry for the misinformation, I'm guessing this guy is right

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
A554551N4710N
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4


View Profile
May 13, 2011, 01:54:54 PM
 #13

My GTX 560Ti get's about 7100Mhash/s with -w 128 -f 30
I wish I had bought a competing AMD card like the 6950 :\
(Although I think mine is better for gaming)
mewantsbitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
May 13, 2011, 01:56:56 PM
 #14

with 7100Mh/s you are waaaaaaay ahead of all of us
mroth7684
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68


View Profile
May 13, 2011, 02:12:05 PM
 #15

I just picked up a Radeon 5850 for $149 at TigerDirect on Tuesday and out of the box with no overclocking I'm getting 270Mhash/s with "-v -w -128 -f 60" The computer is still perfectly useable and there's only slight screen slowness. I'd say the 5850 is the best hash/$ if you're on a budget.
mitak64
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 236


View Profile
May 13, 2011, 03:16:33 PM
 #16

+1
Best bang for the buck.
presha
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
May 14, 2011, 01:09:15 AM
 #17

Quote
Model    Mhash/s    Mhash/W    W    Clock    SP    SDK    Miner    Notes
4870    90.36    0.602    150    750    800    2.1

Where is that data from ?
Just want to see how to optimze parameters for my 4870.

I'm getting ~95 from my sapphire 4870 (OC'd to 848 Mhz with rivatuner, the temp is 77C average with fan set to 37% - nice and quiet, almost no screen lags)
anything more than 848 mhz freezes the screen, so I'll just stick to it until I buy 2x 5850 Wink

1JnkNJrdDDUFywkz8KAMhN7jnFHXvt8JTe
grndzero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
May 14, 2011, 10:02:32 AM
 #18

I just picked up a Radeon 5850 for $149 at TigerDirect on Tuesday and out of the box with no overclocking I'm getting 270Mhash/s with "-v -w -128 -f 60" The computer is still perfectly useable and there's only slight screen slowness. I'd say the 5850 is the best hash/$ if you're on a budget.

If you can find them for the price, they are definitely the best. I decided a little too late to get one of the recert visionteks unfortunately. I managed to pick up a nicely used one local for $150 today though.

Pop it in my system, load my preferred BIOS and it's getting 360 Mh/s ... 2.4Mh:$1 .. sweet!

Ubuntu Desktop x64 -  HD5850 Reference - 400Mh/s w/ cgminer  @ 975C/325M/1.175V - 11.6/2.1 SDK
Donate if you find this helpful: 1NimouHg2acbXNfMt5waJ7ohKs2TtYHePy
film2240
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


Professional filmmaker/Freelance videographer


View Profile WWW
September 03, 2011, 09:59:43 PM
 #19

Anyone have the 6950 and 6970 MHash data?
You can infer it from the MD5 data:
...take the MD5 number and multiply it by 62.63 seems to work well for the 5XXX and 6XXX series, but for the rest, it just gives you an idea in proportion. I'm guessing each series of cards have a number like the 62.63.
It looks like the 6950 should be slightly under the 5870, i.e. you won't get 313 Mhash/s, but you won't be too far off. The 6970 should be slightly better than the 5870.

My Radeon HD6950 gives me ~405MHash/s which is better than the 5870 (afaics)
It is:
1.Overvolted to 1105mV
2.core clock is 905Mhz
3.mem clock is 947mhz (due to system stability issues)
4.Shader unlocked.

Hows that for a radeon Hd6950? Good modding skills or what?

[This signature is available for rent]
[This signature is available for rent]
[This signature is available for rent]
[This signature is available for rent]
bcpokey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
September 03, 2011, 10:13:42 PM
 #20

Hey, thanks for necroing this thread. I normally would say that sarcastically, but I remembered this thread, however was unable to find it for the longest time. I like the info contained within for many uses.

On another note, every one of my 5870s can reach about 430MHash/sec, and if I had a better cooling solution could go above that (I don't overvolt because they're all stuffed together without extenders).
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!