[coinb.in] Open Source, Multi Signature, HD Wallet, SegWit/Bech32 and more!

[spiritglove]

Coinb.in Features Include .001 BTC being taken when ever the algorithm or software writer feels like grabbing some coin.
 AND Expensive transfer fees .0011 minimum. Which gets U a minimum 72 hours of waiting time after u have broadcast your coin.
  Paying a higher transfer fee does NOT move the coin any faster.
 
 I WILL NOT BE USING THIS JUNK WALLET ANY LONGER. I THOUGHT OTHERS SHOULD BE WARNED TO AVOID IT AS WELL

 It may have started as a good idea, but it no longer is a good idea. It is a good way to lose your investment to poor timing and mismanaged coin disbursements

[1714065473]

1714065473

[1714065473]

1714065473

[1714065473]

1714065473

[weex]

Coinb.in Features Include .001 BTC being taken when ever the algorithm or software writer feels like grabbing some coin.
 AND Expensive transfer fees .0011 minimum. Which gets U a minimum 72 hours of waiting time after u have broadcast your coin.
  Paying a higher transfer fee does NOT move the coin any faster.
 
 I WILL NOT BE USING THIS JUNK WALLET ANY LONGER. I THOUGHT OTHERS SHOULD BE WARNED TO AVOID IT AS WELL

 It may have started as a good idea, but it no longer is a good idea. It is a good way to lose your investment to poor timing and mismanaged coin disbursements

You're saying Coinb.in calculated a fee for you? AFAIK, it just leaves whatever you don't send on as a fee.

[coinableS]

Coinb.in Features Include .001 BTC being taken when ever the algorithm or software writer feels like grabbing some coin.
 AND Expensive transfer fees .0011 minimum. Which gets U a minimum 72 hours of waiting time after u have broadcast your coin.
  Paying a higher transfer fee does NOT move the coin any faster.
 
 I WILL NOT BE USING THIS JUNK WALLET ANY LONGER. I THOUGHT OTHERS SHOULD BE WARNED TO AVOID IT AS WELL

 It may have started as a good idea, but it no longer is a good idea. It is a good way to lose your investment to poor timing and mismanaged coin disbursements

You're saying Coinb.in calculated a fee for you? AFAIK, it just leaves whatever you don't send on as a fee.

Yea every time I've used it it's all manual, no auto fee calc. I think he must have used another service that could possibly pretending to be coinbin that's scraping fees off the top of transactions?

[100bitcoin]

The website https://coinb.in seems to be down right now. I had a downloaded copy. So, I tried to use it offline. But, that is now working either while I am trying to create a new Tx. The system is unable to download the UTXO set. There are only 2 available options for mainnet - coinb.in (Bitcoin mainnet) & Blockr.io (Bitcoin mainnet). The first one is not working as expected, but the second one is not working either. It is throwing the error - Unexpected error, unable to retrieve unspent outputs!.

^^Same situation again...

[OutCast3k]

The website https://coinb.in seems to be down right now. I had a downloaded copy. So, I tried to use it offline. But, that is now working either while I am trying to create a new Tx. The system is unable to download the UTXO set. There are only 2 available options for mainnet - coinb.in (Bitcoin mainnet) & Blockr.io (Bitcoin mainnet). The first one is not working as expected, but the second one is not working either. It is throwing the error - Unexpected error, unable to retrieve unspent outputs!.

^^Same situation again...

Our domain registrar let the domain expire, even though it was set to auto renew. It's been resolved and should be back to normal now.

[OutCast3k]

Coinb.in Features Include .001 BTC being taken when ever the algorithm or software writer feels like grabbing some coin.
 AND Expensive transfer fees .0011 minimum. Which gets U a minimum 72 hours of waiting time after u have broadcast your coin.
  Paying a higher transfer fee does NOT move the coin any faster.
 
 I WILL NOT BE USING THIS JUNK WALLET ANY LONGER. I THOUGHT OTHERS SHOULD BE WARNED TO AVOID IT AS WELL

 It may have started as a good idea, but it no longer is a good idea. It is a good way to lose your investment to poor timing and mismanaged coin disbursements

There is no fee required to use coinb.in what so ever, there is no auto calculation set for fees for coinbin, everything is manual, you can set the fees as high or as low as you like.

Please either clarify what you mean, or contact me directly

[100bitcoin]

The website https://coinb.in seems to be down right now. I had a downloaded copy. So, I tried to use it offline. But, that is now working either while I am trying to create a new Tx. The system is unable to download the UTXO set. There are only 2 available options for mainnet - coinb.in (Bitcoin mainnet) & Blockr.io (Bitcoin mainnet). The first one is not working as expected, but the second one is not working either. It is throwing the error - Unexpected error, unable to retrieve unspent outputs!.

^^Same situation again...

Our domain registrar let the domain expire, even though it was set to auto renew. It's been resolved and should be back to normal now.

Domain is back to normalcy, but the core problem still persists. It is a JS code and expected to work independent of the domain. That is NOT happening. Please try the following experiment to understand the problem...

1. Go to https://coinb.in/#settings

2. Change Unspent outputs to Blockr.io (Bitcoin mainnet) and click Submit to save the change.

3. Go to https://coinb.in/#newTransaction

4. Provide the address 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa and click Load.

It will show Unexpected error, unable to retrieve unspent outputs!.

^^This means, the dependency on the domain coinb.in exists on this wallet.

Moreover, I think, support to other block explorers like blockcypher.com, btc.com or blockchain.info needs to be added to retrieve Unspent outputs from Bitcoin mainnet.

[Coinimus]

Hello guys,

I've just registrated here as I've been told that I probably get the best support here.

So sorry for pushing that 1 year old thread but starting a new one didn't seem logical though.

Following issue with coinb.in:

I traded with a partner and used coinb.in multi-sig.

The redeem script
522102ac174028778912dac983b886cf87a242e44e07d5cbdbab214f03e9a83616f840210276ae9 5c64f264f78391fe0799882bea6edfd66650c44803a5c5462f50a3919a921020e02f631816560e6 46d23486ad3a210b452f5b41b6d8fd0814db4a67147f605d53ae

has been generated and shows the following wallet:

3P2jxfzHTjxvq29P85nGddNKqUkcXfeiYi

The trade has been successfull and we wanted now to create a transaction using the redeem script above.
Unfortunately, after loading the redeem script, there are no inputs and no outpots shown (both on 0.00000).

The linked wallet (https://btc.blockr.io/address/info/3P2jxfzHTjxvq29P85nGddNKqUkcXfeiYi) shows 0.000 BTC as well.

BUT if I check any other sites like blockchain, chain.so etc., the wallet shows confirmed inputs:
https://blockchain.info/address/3P2jxfzHTjxvq29P85nGddNKqUkcXfeiYi

I was transferring like 0.0002166 BTC to check if it helps, too but they didn't show up either.

How can I get my money now?

Thanks for help. Leave your wallet for donations in case of successfull!

[eli113]

Thank you very much for this great site of yours coinb.in 
I don't know how busy you are but i am asking permission to send you
a private message concerning a hobby project i am making.

Greetings
Elias C.

[HostFat]

Is there someone that can make a fork of this and add support for Bitcoin Cash?

[peloso]

still nobody knows how to broadcast transaction to bcc network?

[pooya87]

still nobody knows how to broadcast transaction to bcc network?

BCC has one block explorer called blockdozer which has a broadcast option. check it here: http://blockdozer.com/insight/tx/send

there is also electron cash which is risky to use but is an option because it is SPV and fast.

[peloso]

still nobody knows how to broadcast transaction to bcc network?

BCC has one block explorer called blockdozer which has a broadcast option. check it here: http://blockdozer.com/insight/tx/send

there is also electron cash which is risky to use but is an option because it is SPV and fast.

oh! big thanks my friend

[HostFat]

Bitcoin Cash inserted (I'm not sure if it works)
https://github.com/globaltoken/coinbin/commit/88f5eee6ad9114feb70c523ca7c834d99c106476

EDIT:
https://github.com/OutCast3k/coinbin/pull/113

[OutCast3k]

Bitcoin Cash inserted (I'm not sure if it works)
https://github.com/globaltoken/coinbin/commit/88f5eee6ad9114feb70c523ca7c834d99c106476

EDIT:
https://github.com/OutCast3k/coinbin/pull/113

As much as I personally do not support the bitcoin cash hard fork, allowing users to dump it is probably a good thing.

I am reviewing and testing this pull request, but I am also aware that there are a few very minor issues in this pull request, which leaves me wondering if they should be fixed before or after.

[OutCast3k]

New status page: https://status.coinb.in/

[OutCast3k]

Segwit will be enabled within the next week.

[Answerme2]

OP deleted my post i don't know why he did this to may be prevent the truth Op you don't believe in open communication?
this wallet has some problems i signed tx offline using my private key and it said signed but showed the same unsigned tx in the box.weird.unisgned tx was of electrum wallet and it was RBF tx.I hope this time you reply me and don't delete this post.

[OutCast3k]

OP deleted my post i don't know why he did this to may be prevent the truth Op you don't believe in open communication?
this wallet has some problems i signed tx offline using my private key and it said signed but showed the same unsigned tx in the box.weird.unisgned tx was of electrum wallet and it was RBF tx.I hope this time you reply me and don't delete this post.

Sorry it was an accidental delete and was in the process of messaging you about this. You can go through this thread and github and see I don't delete bad feedback.

In truth your complaint is about electrum, its is an issue that's been know about for a while, it likely won't be fixed because we handle data within the transaction in a slightly different way, although I am making presumptions here and will happily inspect your transactions to be sure. What I suggest is; instead of building a transaction using electrum and complaining that this software doesn't sign it properly, you try building and signing a transaction using only coinb.in.

Please keep us updated. Thanks.

*Edited to clarify*

[Answerme2]

OP deleted my post i don't know why he did this to may be prevent the truth Op you don't believe in open communication?
this wallet has some problems i signed tx offline using my private key and it said signed but showed the same unsigned tx in the box.weird.unisgned tx was of electrum wallet and it was RBF tx.I hope this time you reply me and don't delete this post.

Sorry it was an accidental delete and was in the process of messaging you about this. You can go through this thread and github and see I don't delete bad feedback.

In truth your complaint is about electrum, its is an issue that's been know about for a while, it likely won't be fixed because we handle data within the transaction in a slightly different way, although I am making presumptions here and will happily inspect your transactions to be sure. What I suggest is; instead of building a transaction using electrum and complaining that this software doesn't sign it properly, you try building and signing a transaction using only coinb.in.

Please keep us updated. Thanks.

*Edited to clarify*

I tried with coinb.in wallet first but the thing is your wallet does not allow to set custom fees.It stated what is not sent will be used as transaction fees and i had to set custom fees so i created an unsigned tx with electrum wallet RBF enabled and then wrote the unsigned hash in coinb.in offline wallet and used my private key to sign it and it stated signed but showed the same unsigned tx in box.why coinb.in wallet does not allow custom fees?