Uhhhh... ok there robert downy jr. calm down
stop patronizing everybody and being so fucking arrogant.. you probably spend 2 hours writing out your long winded posts only to have maybe one reader who even has the patience to read through all your condescending nonsensical garbage..
go away, seriously.. arrogant douchebag
It's a forum, not a chatroom. Objecting to the time required to read a multiparagraph post is textbook anti-intellectualism. While I may have lacked calmness, indeed, I cannot silently abide unveiled racism and xenophobic mockery. If you find nothing at all of merit in my posts, you may ignore them, though I prefer the lesser extreme where there is *some* discussion, as we are having right now. (I use ignore purely for outright trolls.)
I stopped reading at :
The 75% of all the mining activity it's here.
What does that means? Everybody told us that chinese invest invest invest.
Oh really!
And about the exchange volume , it has been already discussed and proven how it was manipulated.
Dear god. You snipped 1 sentence and still fucked it up.
Mining volume, you fucking idiot. I am now policing this thread just to assemble a list of users with which I vow never to do business. Trading with idiots always costs more than you expect in the end, either in time or some other fuckup.
Actually, Fenix, I believe you may be giving stompix too much credit. He could actually believe that China is somehow manipulating the network to reflect that they are solving 75% of all blocks.
You may be right:
No my dear idiot , I doubt anyone can do business with somebody with your temper.
Can you come with profs that 75% of the mining activity is in China?
That's the word the op used , that's the word I don't like next to that value.
Volume , length, value diameter .
But , I don't expect you to come up with this since I wasn't quoting you on that.
I'll deliver a mild jab at your grammar and syntax, because you seem to be a primary speaker of English and therefore lack an excuse other than a disdain for precision in communication, which says something. It is somewhat taxing to follow, spaces before commas etc.
But more importantly, what sort of "profs" have you that it isn't? I've seen no indication that somehow mining is being manipulated, and I'm not sure how it could be. Exchange volume, when done as off-chain transactions, is largely opaque.
I defended OP despite not being the one quoted because the thread had devolved into widespread attack on several strawmen cherry-picked from his post and exploited for language barrier issues. It is a shame I was incited to need to do so at all. I don't expect everyone to understand why I did; if they understood, I would not have had to do it.
Also , you fail to notice than when people say "and about " , they refer to another part of the discussion.
And I referred here to the faked , and proven faked volume of Chinese exchangers.
So , my conclusion , China matters as much as Bulgaria in the bitcoin system.
Come with numbers to contradict me.
And not with the reported volume of 22k BTC of an exchanger that only has 1000BTC on the order book.
I still cannot help but interpret this as a flawed understanding of the relationship between exchange volume and mining activity. I have no intention to demonstrate mining activity with exchange volume figures, because that doesn't make sense.
As it's been many hours and I have the warm-fuzzy of PMs from OP and other participants voicing appreciation for my defense of polite intercultural relations in Bitcoinland (as well as the warm-fuzzy of some fantastic eggnog) I'm feeling far less testy at present. So help me understand.
