🤔🤔🤔

[cjmoles]

What are you on about? there is no mention of theymos here

of course theymos is not paying any attention to these cases because they are small, he would only take action if he thinks that he is in danger of being held liable by the court of law, until then don't wait for him to do anything. really sad

you don't usually see them tagging real scammers rather they are tagging whomever they want.

The latter is true. I do tag who I want. If I didn't want to tag account traders then I wouldn't. The former is false. I do tag scammers. If you didn't cherry-pick data then you would see those cases.

actmyname actually paid Blazed to get on his trust list.

The reason I got onto DT is something that I did for myself. I didn't even expect anyone to care about it.

actmyname just recently started to tag more and more people for whatever they have done in the past to make it look like he is actively tagging scammers but that was just a stupid move to do.

If you take the sample space for the age of the scam, then you'll see that it's quite evident that you would find older scams as opposed to newer scams. This is, however, assuming that your comment is correct. A lot of the feedback that I've been sending is in response to new threads that out shady activity whereas the bulk of my feedback was in February, which is a bit after my inclusion to DT.

You give serial scammers green trust AND you mark their detractors with red trust ---> that's trust abuse and that makes you complicit and it makes anybody up the line who vouches for you complicit too.  It's just a matter of time until a very clear picture is presented with the right blockchain analytic software suite before you guys realize your mistakes.  And just because you guys think that you're "pseudonyms" make you anonymous  ---> it doesn't mean you're protected from liability, and it goes all the way up the line.

[1714168932]

1714168932

[1714168932]

1714168932

[digaran]

Bump, actmyname is unbanned now, you could continue discussing how untrustworthy he/she is.

[cjmoles]

@digaran  I agree with you in everything you wrote 100%

 
Yes, this person @actmyname I think is sick and deceitful to give people a red trust for no valid reason this sick child has given me a red trust on a topic since 2015 which he attached in the reference i do not own the site within the topic i did not steal anyone and i have moved the topics of that site to Archival  and I am how to be with me 100 BTC and workes in translation and other campaigns, God knows that I am innocent of all these false claims and this red trust i'm not worthy of them. I advise this person to go to see a doctor and not to blackmail people and spread hatred because religion is love.  

@suchmoon  I think this person is also a friend of this patient-> @actmyname who orders him to give people red trust for no reason and he is like a obedient dog who does not disobey his master.

There's a whole ring of them working together....they help each other pull of their scams by manipulating the reputation system....they've been building their networks for a few years....pulling off scams together as a team like this ---> building up trust then exiting and this endorsing a fake cloud mine scam and this creating fake ICO's . All involving the same group of scammers who've been receiving green trust from actmyname (and his co-conspirators) while they give red trust to whoever tries to expose their scams ---> there's a team of these thieves working together, manipulating the trust system to pull of their thefts with efficiency. 

[minifrij]

There's a whole ring of them working together....they help each other pull of their scams by manipulating the reputation system....they've been building their networks for a few years....pulling off scams together as a team like this ---> building up trust then exiting and this endorsing a fake cloud mine scam and this creating fake ICO's . All involving the same group of scammers who've been receiving green trust from actmyname (and his co-conspirators) while they give red trust to whoever tries to expose their scams ---> there's a team of these thieves working together, manipulating the trust system to pull of their thefts with efficiency. 

[cjmoles]

There's a whole ring of them working together....they help each other pull of their scams by manipulating the reputation system....they've been building their networks for a few years....pulling off scams together as a team like this ---> building up trust then exiting and this endorsing a fake cloud mine scam and this creating fake ICO's . All involving the same group of scammers who've been receiving green trust from actmyname (and his co-conspirators) while they give red trust to whoever tries to expose their scams ---> there's a team of these thieves working together, manipulating the trust system to pull of their thefts with efficiency. 

You may think it's a joke, but all the pump and dump scams, exit scams, identity theft rings and deceptive manipulations occurring in plain sight on this forum with the encouragement of the default trust members could actually lead to some serious RICO/International Wirefraud/Conspiracy indictments for those who are involved. It's just a matter of time before it catches up with them ---> I'm just saying: I'm not the only who's been ripped off by these guys.  And I wouldn't doubt that whoever owns this site has been cooperating with Interpol/the CIA/the FBI/the SEC/and FinCEN because it's pretty serious stuff yet it's very obviously being ignored, in fact encouraged, for some odd reason.

[4x4et]

Bump, actmyname is unbanned now, you could continue discussing how untrustworthy he/she is.

How come trusted member gets banned, and then unbanned, and still remains trusted member lol

Josh, stop deleting, this is pretty much on-topic.

Btw is it cold in that hellhole called Moose Factory?

[actmyname]

Josh, stop deleting, this is pretty much on-topic.

If you've been posting off-topic replies then it is not me who is deleting them. Rather, you would probably want to look toward the moderators.

And this thread also isn't self-moderated, never mind started by my account.

[MainIbem]

In case anybody that is interested has somehow missed the rest of the related discussion the thread can be found here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.msg37414857#msg37414857 . Essentially it reads as your typical Meta thread complaining about DT ratings that they disagree with.

Just because a negative rating is left, and you disagree with it, that does not constitute abuse. You continually are attempting to skew Marketplace Trust ratings in exchange for money.

You nailed it.
There seem to be a complete miss understanding of the activities of the various regulatory units of this forum. The DT know that any action he takes is subject to review, so he cannot just sanction without a reason. It is not just possible. that would amount to hatred, and I am sure no DT will do that.

[WerSalit]

at the moment, many users are interested in :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=965234



reference link : https://i.imgur.com/nvYeFbV.png    what does it mean, actmyname? wrong link?

This account was blackmailed, extorted merit, and was promised a negative trust in case of failure.
few hours later You tagged account without proof. or maybe wrong link?
when I came to you, I didn't get any reply or attention.


Look at this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4862145.0

P.S. I know that plagiarism has been found on the account, but it does not apply to this case. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg45972526#msg45972526

[actmyname]

at the moment, many users are interested in :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=965234

I don't see any relation to dumbtool45 in that topic you linked. As for your PM, it must have been buried.
It's not uncommon for legions of messages to swarm my inbox.I do see now that he's sent outgoing negative trust to people for backing out of merit purchases. (I mean, really?)

If you want me to edit the trust comment then I can with an updated reference but I don't see the need.

[marlboroza]

~
reference link : https://i.imgur.com/nvYeFbV.png    what does it mean, actmyname? wrong link?

Perhaps this is correct link http://archive.is/iiqKX#selection-1727.0-1727.25      
LEGENDARY ! HERO MEMBER ! SR. MEMBER ! FULL MEMBER ! - DISCOUNT 30%

3 Full member bought! tks

Instead doing research on why actmyname linked that reference, please read positive rating given to mentioned account, check posts in that timestamp and compare results  

Edited

[WerSalit]

at the moment, many users are interested in :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=965234

I don't see any relation to dumbtool45 in that topic you linked. As for your PM, it must have been buried.
It's not uncommon for legions of messages to swarm my inbox.I do see now that he's sent outgoing negative trust to people for backing out of merit purchases. (I mean, really?)

If you want me to edit the trust comment then I can with an updated reference but I don't see the need.

Yes, i want to know.Why? This account will soon be banned for plagiarism. But this is not important in this case.
He sold 1 merit, and he was started to blackmail, extort 20 merits, threatening with a negative trust in case of refusal. He refused and 2 hours later received a negative trust from you. "Account trading " without any proof?

Now you can give a negative feedback regarding the merits of this account and the account of the extortionist, having as evidence his own recognition in the abuse of merit
But you dont do it now when it's visible. But apparently by the appeal / complaint of a person, you quickly react by lowering the trust, even without applying proof.

[marlboroza]

"Account trading " without any proof?

Didn't I post proof above your post?

[WerSalit]

~
reference link : https://i.imgur.com/nvYeFbV.png    what does it mean, actmyname? wrong link?

Perhaps this is correct link http://archive.is/iiqKX#selection-1727.0-1727.25      
LEGENDARY ! HERO MEMBER ! SR. MEMBER ! FULL MEMBER ! - DISCOUNT 30%

3 Full member bought! tks

Instead doing research on why actmyname linked that reference, please read positive rating given to mentioned account, check posts in that timestamp and compare results  

Edited

Thanks for the link, marlboroza. Yes, now I see that this account has declared the purchase/sale of forum accounts.
But I understand that you just helped to find the proof, he had no proof at the time of the feedback, and therefore inserted an empty picture.
Reread, and you will understand what I'm talking about.
Everything happened as promised by the blackmailer to the seller of the merits of..

that's actually the blackmailer himself, is recognized in the purchase, the silent blackmail, of course :

Я cтaлa cвидeтeлeм o пpoдaжe cмepитa. Я кyпилa smerit y этoгo aккayнтa зa вoceмь дoллapoв. Я знaю пpoдaвaть Smerit зaпpeщeнo пpaвилaми фopyмa. Этoт чeлoвeк https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=965234 пpoдaeт иx в тeлeгpaмм кaнaлax. Cкpиншoты c дoкaзaтeльcтвaми
1 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/3e2e0e0023424362.html
2 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/cc8782f323424363.html
3 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/6896f45d23424368.html
4 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/91dad8d223424369.html
Я xoчy пoльзoвaтьcя чecтным фopyмoм нo тaкиe пpoдaвцы eгo пopтят. Извинитe ecли я дocтaвил вaм нeyдoбcтвa нo я cчитaю cвoим дoлгoм пocтaвить вac в извecтнocть. Xoтeлa нaпиcaть вaм личнoe cooбщeниe, нo нe cмoглa, пишeтcя тoлькo paз в чac.

I'm not defending a merit seller, it's weird to see a blackmailer become a winner.

[marlboroza]

Thanks for the link, marlboroza. Yes, now I see that this account has declared the purchase/sale of forum accounts.
But I understand that you just helped to find the proof, he had no proof at the time of the feedback, and therefore inserted an empty picture.

There is no proof they didn't have proof. I linked wrong reference many times, however, I changed them to correct one, I suggest actmyname to do the same

that's actually the blackmailer himself, is recognized in the purchase, the silent blackmail, of course :

Я cтaлa cвидeтeлeм o пpoдaжe cмepитa. Я кyпилa smerit y этoгo aккayнтa зa вoceмь дoллapoв. Я знaю пpoдaвaть Smerit зaпpeщeнo пpaвилaми фopyмa. Этoт чeлoвeк https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=965234 пpoдaeт иx в тeлeгpaмм кaнaлax. Cкpиншoты c дoкaзaтeльcтвaми
1 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/3e2e0e0023424362.html
2 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/cc8782f323424363.html
3 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/6896f45d23424368.html
4 - http://vfl.ru/fotos/91dad8d223424369.html
Я xoчy пoльзoвaтьcя чecтным фopyмoм нo тaкиe пpoдaвцы eгo пopтят. Извинитe ecли я дocтaвил вaм нeyдoбcтвa нo я cчитaю cвoим дoлгoм пocтaвить вac в извecтнocть. Xoтeлa нaпиcaть вaм личнoe cooбщeниe, нo нe cмoглa, пишeтcя тoлькo paз в чac.

I'm not defending a merit seller, it's weird to see a blackmailer become a winner.

My Russian is not so good, but from this I understand they bought merit for 8$. I didn't check pictures, but if you want to discuss about them open new topic in reputation, this isn't correct thread.

[suchmoon]

that's actually the blackmailer himself, is recognized in the purchase, the silent blackmail, of course :

Who's blackmailing whom? It looks like the merit seller / account trader got tagged red. What are you trying to say?

[marlboroza]

that's actually the blackmailer himself, is recognized in the purchase, the silent blackmail, of course :

Who's blackmailing whom? It looks like the merit seller / account trader got tagged red. What are you trying to say?

From what I understood is that account Mr.Rbx bought merit from account dumbtool45 and they tried to blackmail them. I won't break my head too much over it, as both accounts are tagged.

So, correction to my last post, you don't really have to open new topic. I still don't see what this has to do with actmyname.

[actmyname]

I believe that I should chime for a bit.

1) There appears to be some false presumption that I have tagged the user without proof. The image shows their trust page. The image shows their outgoing trust feedback. There are comments in that feedback which talk of account trading with a known account trader.

2) From what I gather, WerSalit may be under the assumption that I had tagged dumbtool45 because of Mr.Rbx's "blackmail". This is not the case. Someone was giving a report about dumbtool45 selling merit however I couldn't make sense of the evidence presented. Hence the alternative feedback. Though at this point they've ousted themselves as a merit seller as well.

[WerSalit]

~

Thank you. That's all I wanted to understand.