Chello
Member
 Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 21, 2014, 12:52:13 PM |
|
http://hvc.1gh.com/ says now: GPU mining:
cgminer for AMD/NVIDIA GPU (version 3.7.3 2014-03-20)
Is this a typo or its now possible to mine with one miner for both brands ? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 21, 2014, 12:54:35 PM |
|
http://hvc.1gh.com/ says now: GPU mining:
cgminer for AMD/NVIDIA GPU (version 3.7.3 2014-03-20)
Is this a typo or its now possible to mine with one miner for both brands ? cgminer runs well on most modern Nvidias, but performs a tad worse than ccminer. And, the current version is overfiltering shares when your hashrate is less than about 1.7Mhs (not all valid low-difficulty shares are submitted). |
|
|
|
|
dusan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2014, 04:47:28 PM |
|
i tried to mine HVC coin with cgminer on radeon HD 5760
with following problem can somebody help me please
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[16:57:39] Probing for an alive pool
[16:57:40] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
[16:58:25] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[16:58:25] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[16:58:25] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[16:58:25] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[16:58:25] Try restarting cgminer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 21, 2014, 04:48:26 PM |
|
i tried to mine HVC coin with cgminer on radeon HD 5760
with following problem can somebody help me please
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[16:57:39] Probing for an alive pool
[16:57:40] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
[16:58:25] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[16:58:25] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[16:58:25] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[16:58:25] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[16:58:25] Try restarting cgminer.
Sorry, it does not work on 5xxx, 6xxx cards yet. |
|
|
|
|
dusan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2014, 04:55:46 PM |
|
i tried to mine HVC coin with cgminer on radeon HD 5760
with following problem can somebody help me please
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Log date is now 2014-03-21
[16:57:37] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[16:57:39] Probing for an alive pool
[16:57:40] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
[16:58:25] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[16:58:25] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[16:58:25] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[16:58:25] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[16:58:25] Try restarting cgminer.
Sorry, it does not work on 5xxx, 6xxx cards yet. thank you for quick answer  |
|
|
|
|
|
BitMinerN8
|
|
March 21, 2014, 07:56:17 PM |
|
So on mining PTS, we're really going on > 3 days without solving a single block? Ouch.  |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 21, 2014, 07:59:29 PM |
|
So on mining PTS, we're really going on > 3 days without solving a single block? Ouch. At 90% of the network at certain famous pool this is not something unexpectable. Figure, until some evil hacker forks it, noone will bother. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitMinerN8
|
|
March 21, 2014, 08:19:32 PM |
|
So on mining PTS, we're really going on > 3 days without solving a single block? Ouch. At 90% of the network at certain famous pool this is not something unexpectable. Figure, until some evil hacker forks it, noone will bother. Is there a site with PTS hashrate distribution graph? |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 21, 2014, 08:20:29 PM |
|
So on mining PTS, we're really going on > 3 days without solving a single block? Ouch. At 90% of the network at certain famous pool this is not something unexpectable. Figure, until some evil hacker forks it, noone will bother. Is there a site with PTS hashrate distribution graph? I don't think so, just an estimate. |
|
|
|
|
bitmonster
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
@cryptominer
|
|
March 25, 2014, 04:44:40 PM |
|
Great job Reorder, a full 2 Mhash more on the same set-up...
Congrats & greetings
|
|
|
|
|
meyns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2014, 12:01:16 AM |
|
Can anyone explain this problem? [00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Probing for an alive pool
[00:56:44] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000244
[01:00:54] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[01:00:54] Setting GPUs to idle performance.
Running Ubuntu 12.04 on 4x HD7950, with latest source from https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_keccak. Using pool 1gh or even nonce-pool gives the same problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 26, 2014, 12:03:48 AM |
|
Can anyone explain this problem? [00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Probing for an alive pool
[00:56:44] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000244
[01:00:54] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[01:00:54] Setting GPUs to idle performance.
Running Ubuntu 12.04 on 4x HD7950, with latest source from https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_keccak. Using pool 1gh or even nonce-pool gives the same problem. Just give it a few more minutes: it is compiling the kernel. Apparently you have not only 7950s in the system? |
|
|
|
|
meyns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2014, 12:29:38 AM |
|
Can anyone explain this problem? [00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Probing for an alive pool
[00:56:44] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000244
[01:00:54] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[01:00:54] Setting GPUs to idle performance.
Running Ubuntu 12.04 on 4x HD7950, with latest source from https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_keccak. Using pool 1gh or even nonce-pool gives the same problem. Just give it a few more minutes: it is compiling the kernel. Apparently you have not only 7950s in the system? Only 4x 7950. There are no other gpu's, not even on board. After 10 minutes it isn't even started. |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 26, 2014, 12:37:00 AM |
|
Can anyone explain this problem? [00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Probing for an alive pool
[00:56:44] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000244
[01:00:54] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[01:00:54] Setting GPUs to idle performance.
Running Ubuntu 12.04 on 4x HD7950, with latest source from https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_keccak. Using pool 1gh or even nonce-pool gives the same problem. Just give it a few more minutes: it is compiling the kernel. Apparently you have not only 7950s in the system? Only 4x 7950. There are no other gpu's, not even on board. After 10 minutes it isn't even started. In this case it probably hangs starting the compiled kernel on one of cards. The likely cause for that is hardware, but just to be sure please try deleting *.bin files in cgminer directory and starting over. Another possible reason could be a misbehaving compiler, the miner was only tested with Catalyst versions 13.11 beta and newer. |
|
|
|
|
meyns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2014, 12:54:12 AM |
|
Can anyone explain this problem? [00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Log date is now 2014-03-26
[00:56:43] Started cgminer 3.7.3
[00:56:43] Probing for an alive pool
[00:56:44] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000244
[01:00:54] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[01:00:54] Setting GPUs to idle performance.
Running Ubuntu 12.04 on 4x HD7950, with latest source from https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_keccak. Using pool 1gh or even nonce-pool gives the same problem. Just give it a few more minutes: it is compiling the kernel. Apparently you have not only 7950s in the system? Only 4x 7950. There are no other gpu's, not even on board. After 10 minutes it isn't even started. In this case it probably hangs starting the compiled kernel on one of cards. The likely cause for that is hardware, but just to be sure please try deleting *.bin files in cgminer directory and starting over. Another possible reason could be a misbehaving compiler, the miner was only tested with Catalyst versions 13.11 beta and newer. I can't find any .bin files in the directory. I'm running catalyst 13.12 stable. I'm running 2 gpus on the motherboard and 2 with a usb riser. Disconnecting the 2 usb risers I'm able to start mining HVC through 1GH. With the 2 usb risers I'm unable. Scrypt goes fine btw. |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
March 26, 2014, 09:15:07 PM |
|
I get much higher hash rate (about 10%) across all my GPU mining rigs when mining HVC on zhpool with a higher diff of 0.2+ compared to 1GH.
Is there a possibility to have a higher diff port for the GPU miners on 1GH also?
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 26, 2014, 09:25:15 PM |
|
I get much higher hash rate (about 10%) across all my GPU mining rigs when mining HVC on zhpool with a higher diff of 0.2+ compared to 1GH.
Is there a possibility to have a higher diff port for the GPU miners on 1GH also?
What is a typical hashrate of one of your rigs where you have the difference? We'd rather adjust vardiff properly than set up multiple ports as this confuses users unnecessarily. |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
March 26, 2014, 09:37:57 PM |
|
I get much higher hash rate (about 10%) across all my GPU mining rigs when mining HVC on zhpool with a higher diff of 0.2+ compared to 1GH.
Is there a possibility to have a higher diff port for the GPU miners on 1GH also?
What is a typical hashrate of one of your rigs where you have the difference? We'd rather adjust vardiff properly than set up multiple ports as this confuses users unnecessarily. It could be vardiff but starting at 0.2 as I did see it change to 0.4 also. (Not 100% sure) Here are my results using your latest 3.25 cgminer and waiting at least 30mins to stabilize: 7850 @ 1GH = 5.38 MH/s 7850 @ ZHP = 6.30 MH/s 280x @ 1GH = 10.50 MH/s 280x @ ZHP = 11.49 MH/s I have 4 rigs and they all got a noticeable boost. Others are noticing similar: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122 |
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 26, 2014, 11:21:50 PM |
|
I get much higher hash rate (about 10%) across all my GPU mining rigs when mining HVC on zhpool with a higher diff of 0.2+ compared to 1GH.
Is there a possibility to have a higher diff port for the GPU miners on 1GH also?
What is a typical hashrate of one of your rigs where you have the difference? We'd rather adjust vardiff properly than set up multiple ports as this confuses users unnecessarily. It could be vardiff but starting at 0.2 as I did see it change to 0.4 also. (Not 100% sure) Here are my results using your latest 3.25 cgminer and waiting at least 30mins to stabilize: 7850 @ 1GH = 5.38 MH/s 7850 @ ZHP = 6.30 MH/s 280x @ 1GH = 10.50 MH/s 280x @ ZHP = 11.49 MH/s I have 4 rigs and they all got a noticeable boost. Others are noticing similar: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122I have now adjusted vardiff to push up more agressively than down, that should help with this. |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
March 27, 2014, 04:09:19 AM |
|
I get much higher hash rate (about 10%) across all my GPU mining rigs when mining HVC on zhpool with a higher diff of 0.2+ compared to 1GH.
Is there a possibility to have a higher diff port for the GPU miners on 1GH also?
What is a typical hashrate of one of your rigs where you have the difference? We'd rather adjust vardiff properly than set up multiple ports as this confuses users unnecessarily. It could be vardiff but starting at 0.2 as I did see it change to 0.4 also. (Not 100% sure) Here are my results using your latest 3.25 cgminer and waiting at least 30mins to stabilize: 7850 @ 1GH = 5.38 MH/s 7850 @ ZHP = 6.30 MH/s 280x @ 1GH = 10.50 MH/s 280x @ ZHP = 11.49 MH/s I have 4 rigs and they all got a noticeable boost. Others are noticing similar: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122I have now adjusted vardiff to push up more agressively than down, that should help with this. Thank you! I will try this tonight and will let you know. |
|
|
|
|
