Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 12:01:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] 1GH.COM - HVC / MAX / MMC / PTS / VIA Anonymous Pool ★  (Read 75104 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
arfcz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 02:55:06 PM
 #561

Any optimizations on settings? I tried some and im getting this:

270(non x) 1000MHz/850MHz/1.075V 3.665M each
280x 1080MHz/1000MHz/1.112V 6.039M each

Thanks
jack80
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 03:04:47 PM
 #562

With my Nvidia 750ti 2gb i have 4500 kh/s thank a Christian and your cudaminer . ( With 2 Nvidia 750ti have 9000 kh/s ) .






██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄███████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀▀████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████





INTRODUCING WAVES
ULTIMATE ASSET/CUSTOM TOKEN BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM







reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 03:07:15 PM
 #563

Any optimizations on settings? I tried some and im getting this:

270(non x) 1000MHz/850MHz/1.075V 3.665M each
280x 1080MHz/1000MHz/1.112V 6.039M each

Thanks
You could try tuning xintensity (it is a fork of Karloth's cgminer)
mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 03:27:14 PM
 #564

Any optimizations on settings? I tried some and im getting this:

270(non x) 1000MHz/850MHz/1.075V 3.665M each
280x 1080MHz/1000MHz/1.112V 6.039M each

Thanks

I have managed 4.05Mh/s for 270 1100/1000Mhz but only 5.5Mh/s for 280x 1080/1000Mhz. All at I 7.

What is your setting for 280x ?
Chello
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:05:49 PM
 #565

I run my MSI 270 (non x) with 1180/1050 at stock voltage and have 4,29M with i4, the 280x with 1060/1050 run with 5,44M and i have there also i4.

My 750ti with +135/400 run with 4200k in ccminer.
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:07:49 PM
 #566

For finetuning, you may have better luck with xintensity setting than with intensity. Looks like values just above 100 work well.
blacklig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:18:53 PM
 #567

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

How are you settings for 280X or 7950 or 270 though?
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:21:34 PM
 #568

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.
blacklig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:48:24 PM
 #569

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:50:14 PM
 #570

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy
Yes, but switching work between them is slower than just leaving the logic alone.
mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:51:25 PM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 05:05:05 PM by mfqrs3
 #571

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy

Yes that would be great, or more optimised cgminer. Amd cards are lacking behind nV, and that we don't see very often.
blacklig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:51:28 PM
 #572

I run my MSI 270 (non x) with 1180/1050 at stock voltage and have 4,29M with i4, the 280x with 1060/1050 run with 5,44M and i have there also i4.

My 750ti with +135/400 run with 4200k in ccminer.

does this algo incorparate CPU as well?
Have some older 4 cores athlon, all of them are at 25% load.. and 2x280X and each doing 5.9 MHs at 1100/1000 with I 10, but I dont have no idea what should be optimum settings as I just discovered this coin to be gupu mineable and looks interesting...
blacklig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:52:02 PM
 #573

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy

Yes that would be great, or more optimised cgminer. Amd cards are lacking behind Nv, and that we don't see very often.

at Max launch there was also one day nvidia dominance Cheesy
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:55:38 PM
 #574

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy

Yes that would be great, or more optimised cgminer. Amd cards are lacking behind Nv, and that we don't see very often.
More optimizations to cgminer are to come indeed. However, do you have numbers of AMD being behind Nvidia? As far as I know, 290/290X are not matched by top Nvidias on the moment.
blacklig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 04:57:08 PM
 #575

Is this another super eco algorithm? Its cold in here once I switched even from skein Cheesy

The algorithm is intentionally designed to make some GPU threads idle while other are working, indeed.

is it possible to put all GPU threads into work?  Cheesy

Yes that would be great, or more optimised cgminer. Amd cards are lacking behind Nv, and that we don't see very often.
More optimizations to cgminer are to come indeed. However, do you have numbers of AMD being behind Nvidia? As far as I know, 290/290X are not matched by top Nvidias on the moment.

but super efficient 750Ti performs even better than 270 which are more expensive and twice as hungry, yet in AMD standards they are pretty efficient too...
Chello
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 05:00:18 PM
 #576

I run my MSI 270 (non x) with 1180/1050 at stock voltage and have 4,29M with i4, the 280x with 1060/1050 run with 5,44M and i have there also i4.

My 750ti with +135/400 run with 4200k in ccminer.

does this algo incorparate CPU as well?
Is your wallet open ? If so than its possible that this mine too Smiley
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 05:01:57 PM
 #577



but super efficient 750Ti performs even better than 270 which are more expensive and twice as hungry, yet in AMD standards they are pretty efficient too...

750Ti is the new generation card, while 270 is an overclocked 3-year-old 7850. However, AMD can do better, I am still on it.
MOCKBA
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 06:14:14 PM
 #578

Ok im try on ATI 5770 and dont work .


Im use --heavy --vote 512 -o stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333 -u WALLET -p x .

The miner is beta and WIP, it does not work on anything but GCN cards yet, give it up.

I've compiled on Mac (6770HD) with the same result. Sad

Also I cannot seem to get even --skein working. Always getting "Pool 0 JSON stratum auth failed: (unknown reason)". Any ideas why?
The released version on hvc.1gh.com hopefully supports VLIW cards (at least compiler does not crash anymore). Please upgrade.

For skein, you were probably using the wrong pool, I have tested that it works on skc.coinmine.pl

Tried new release on Mac again and it crashes OSX 10.9.2... I do see OSX compiling .cl and then it goes boom. Just FYI.
chango
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 09:24:32 PM
 #579

Hi there I am getting this error with the new release on the 5850:

Code:
Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [22:20:17] Error compiling program for search.

Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!

 [22:20:17] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
 [22:20:17] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.

I am using catalyst 14.2. in Ubuntu 12.04.

Regards.


reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 09:27:09 PM
 #580

Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com , massive hashrate improvement, please upgrade!

Unfortunately, VLIW cards still won't work.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!