Participating in bounties with low allocations

[summerbloom]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Honestly in my experience,it's dose'nt matter if budget allocation are minimal 1%or less than one hundred us dollars atlest it's legitimate and  make sure that will pay immediately once ICO project will be end ,, and not scam, cause some bounty campaign  despite have a big   budget allocation for bounty hunter, but at the end, it will be
scam or otherwise it will be manipulated of some greedy person involved behind of this project,,or will not be  honest according to their pledge after ICO will be end,,,on other
hand ,experiencee of this situation is not only you,cause even  other people can do the desame.

[senopratama]

the small allocation if participants little certainly not be a problem. but I think just a little bit like that. However, that has often left a bit allocation and choose a larger allocation. of course, it hopes part received will also be big and that's been the goal of many people.

[Hanazawa]

There are two types of bounty humters, the first bounty hunter absolutely wants to earn money they are doing all their best to earn money because it is a human needs. They participating in some bounty campaigns even it was have a low boumty pool allocation because all of them money is important.

The other one! there are bounty hunters that not only money arw they want, they want to earn and at the same time they want also tp learn no matter what was the allocation of a particular bounty campaigns allocated. They wants both of earning and learning because thy know that not only money is important in our life but also learning is a best weapon to survive in this world.

[kakade]

When finidng the bounties with the low allocations, actually we have realized them at first. On the bounty thread, commmonly there have been stated that the allocation will be this amount. We must learn how to calculate the real money that probably you get from the allocation. We must also consider how many participants joining that bounty. Small allocation for small bounty participants may be also worthed. If it is small, it is better to search for the other bounty.

[Bitze]

of course it's always tempting to look for high wins.
but little of a good project is still better than many coins from a project that has no future 

[m. yasir]

If your 1% allocation can be $ 100 or $ 50 it is still okay and imagine if you only get 7 coins for $ 1 then you can only $ 7. Within a month you participate as good as any price if you can just a little. no more than $ 50 then I say you fail in choosing bounty. It is quite disappointing but it does exist. Think of it as part of our process of choosing bounty.

[electronicash]

there are worth and some aren't. if you can't stand it, you should be sticking to signature campaign that pays BTC.

i remember there were people complaining about how much token they get from the Chronobank TIME bounty which they have participated for months yet the token they got was less than 10 token. the price of the token is worth more than $8 each though but still most of them complain and not just that. claiming the token has made them complain more because the team needs an eth address that's new and never been used.

[EfterlysT]

I think it worth participating in them, simply because you are almost not doing anything, spending around 20 mins a day, which is not a big deal.

[maiden]

It is not bad to join bounty campaign with low allocations at least it is legit and only have a limit in participants.

agree, there are some campaign that has  high allocation but at the end, they didn’t meet their expectations so at the end, they will scam many participants as well as the investors.

[0t3p0t]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Well for me, this is the matter of choosing the right one for us. Sometimes, bounty hunters prefer to choose high allocation rates. I myself depends on how good or solid the projects is but we cannot avoid getting lost  from failed projects that we think they will promise huge return or profit. Of course we need to make sure that our efforts as a bounty hunter woudn't be wasted so we need to make our own due diligence regarding choosing the best one.

[TraiKH]

Why you need to worry about it when you do the work and join the bounty is free. Plus, you have the right to choose the right campaign for you. I see some stretch bounty campaigns with shares for bonuses are very low. And in fact, these campaigns are not the least. I do not worry about it if it's a potential project or a really serious, legitimate project that focuses on the development of the project.

[Coin-1]

The stake 1-2% of all sold tokens is a normal allocation for the bounty of a reliable project. Also you need to give a heed to the quantity of a stakes within the bounty allocation. Some managers give a low chunk of all bounty budget for certain campaigns (social networks, etc). It depends only on their own decision. If you don't agree with the size of rewards, just do not participate in this bounty campaigns.

[chocolaty]

As much as possible, choose a campaign with a huge allocation for bounty campaign and less participants. You won't get big earnings if you settle on a low-budget bounty campaign especially now that not all of them set limit for participants. Some even reach 300 to 400 and that will give you a very small value in return.

[ethergod]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

first of all let's be honest with ourselves when we say how much work bounty is. It's not. I'm also joining bounty campaigns now and then, but it takes me max 10 minutes each day to get the work done. If you worked for fiat that much, how much would you get paid?

It depends. If you write articles or make videos, it can take a long time to produce quality work. Also, it takes a while to write quality posts if you are in a signature campaign.

[maaldaz]

Joining a low allocation project sometimes making us doubtful about the end of the project.
But form a small bounty allocation could give us a big reward when the project success, and the participant of the bounty are small. It's good for us.

[fortelen]

1% is actually normal. There are still some bounties that only give 1% of their token supply to be the rewards for all participants. However, it will depend on our way to join and the total supply of the tokens. If the total supply is big, 1% will be legit, too. However, it is true that not all bounties are legit. We cannot predict which one will be legit after the end of the ICO. For, the unpredictable participants may register in the last remaining days.

[L00n3y]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Lets say the project you participated in will run for two months for $100. Time you spent daily for your daily task is 10 minutes thus you will spent about 10 hrs to complete your daily task (10 x 2 months or 60 days is 10 hrs). $100 for 10 hrs of task is i think a reasonable amount.

[papagapa]

Strongly depends on you, whether if you are okay with that price and with your accounts, or whatever you use to be a participant for such bounty.

[WAKKOCAI]

Much depends on the rank in the subscription campaigns. In general, I think that it is worth looking for a bounty with a pool of at least 2 percent. Somebody say there are sometimes 3 percents, but I have not seen such campaigns..

[safem]

As a matter of fact, I think this issue of participating in bounty programs for months and afterwards be given little tokens is becoming more rampant. I was a victim of that too sometime ago that after the end of the bounty campaign, the tokens I was given did not even worth 30$. In my own opinion I think such project names should be noted and people should be discouraged from participating in it in the future.