nunya_coin
|
|
January 17, 2014, 02:26:21 PM |
|
[quote author=MrDucats link=topic=419943.msg4562652#msg4562652 date=1389961254]
Please open network port 25856 on your router to connect.
Use the following configuration file:
[code]rpcuser=username rpcpassword=password rpcport=25858
More information will follow soon and we are ready to take your questions. [/quote] Couple things I noticed, compiling from source on linux. Had to chmod +x the /src/leveldb/build_detect_platform file to get it to compile. Also, it looks to my untrained eye like you are actually using port 25858 for both the PORT and default RPCPORT, ./init.cpp: " -port=<port> " + _("Listen for connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -bind=<addr> " + _("Bind to given address and always listen on it. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 1 when listening)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 0)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -rpcport=<port> " + _("Listen for JSON-RPC connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" +
[/code]
|
|
|
|
michaelsss
|
|
January 17, 2014, 02:36:50 PM |
|
lol
most of coin belongs to DEV
anybody got coin? check it.
and please check the source code , how many coin in first 200 block
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
January 17, 2014, 02:40:34 PM |
|
lol
most of coin belongs to DEV
anybody got coin? check it.
and please check the source code , how many coin in first 200 block
I got 1K from solo mining. But now diff is unreal for solo.
|
|
|
|
MrDucats (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:01:49 PM |
|
./init.cpp: " -port=<port> " + _("Listen for connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -bind=<addr> " + _("Bind to given address and always listen on it. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 1 when listening)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 0)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -rpcport=<port> " + _("Listen for JSON-RPC connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" +
Good catch. This was only cosmetic. As you can see in protocol.h the port being used is 25856 which has now been updated in init.cpp.
|
|
|
|
MrDucats (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:09:03 PM |
|
lol
most of coin belongs to DEV
anybody got coin? check it.
and please check the source code , how many coin in first 200 block
My laptop is not finding blocks with this difficulty either. We are aiming to get a pool started within 24 hours.
|
|
|
|
nunya_coin
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:10:40 PM |
|
./init.cpp: " -port=<port> " + _("Listen for connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -bind=<addr> " + _("Bind to given address and always listen on it. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 1 when listening)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 0)") + "\n" + ./init.cpp: " -rpcport=<port> " + _("Listen for JSON-RPC connections on <port> (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" +
Good catch. This was only cosmetic. As you can see in protocol.h the port being used is 25856 which has now been updated in init.cpp. I appreciate the reply, I'll change how I search for ports going forward!
|
|
|
|
cocoxxx
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:12:55 PM |
|
need pool, no pool is not fair with cpu
|
ShareCoin:SV4bDxoaex4DoBxCMfAMbHyxV8hhuSXLBa
|
|
|
busminer
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:13:56 PM |
|
no chance with my cpu ^( 64EZiTZCemZK9a67aM5ve5oDDNTQGcBE5t
|
|
|
|
Manwe
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:29:35 PM |
|
p2pool, please.
|
|
|
|
112tigra112
Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:40:47 PM |
|
In the treasury) 5yvaa9FSm6zWcnoaGQSLSZqnAzmcBZ6p6v
|
|
|
|
mm2543363580
|
|
January 17, 2014, 03:52:45 PM |
|
no chance with my cpu ^(
5stFnqVvWNBX7mKaEp214N3XLRXwFJRE8X
thx
|
|
|
|
katsoo
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 04:03:00 PM |
|
634D3YoNZeZK1ZPatr5etSgjh1zdxPKLn3
cpu is sputtering, and coughing I think...
|
|
|
|
NodeSeperator
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 04:07:20 PM |
|
{ "blocks" : 308, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 835.73765216, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
|
BTC: 12aXywzKHYxjJz2otZqfuYZVR4HfzZ3Hiz | LTC: LUKKyXML63AqyZPYjHxYAYFRSuqnB8D46o | NOBLE: 9eBcr5KDVhPLHtEitKxSxTmtLRGFsGoVEN | Digibyte: DBAp4ekcg43Hu6Pyn1AxDvxLETxhtf8u6s
|
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 04:09:46 PM |
|
So is this a quark clone? Won't bother with it if it is.
|
|
|
|
MrDucats (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 04:27:15 PM |
|
So is this a quark clone? Won't bother with it if it is.
The algoritme is equal to Quark but coin distribution is totally different and more like Peercoin.
|
|
|
|
bergdino
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:13:20 PM |
|
{ "blocks" : 336, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 2366.15324099, "errors" : "", "generate" : true, "genproclimit" : 3, "hashespersec" : 49199, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
|
virtualdn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1093
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:30:18 PM |
|
cpu coins become useless. such difficulty in a few hours is outrageous.
|
1 BTC = 1 BTC
|
|
|
0btc
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:41:19 PM |
|
I've tried to adapt Neisklar's https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin to Ducats using this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=214512.0;all and come up with the following patch: http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch .. A couple of things I'm sure are off. At the very least the SUBSIDY_FUNC is entirely wrong. I tried to verify functionality by running in testnet mode, but the Ducats testnet didn't seem to exist (or I messed up). Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100% . It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool ! And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following: git clone https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin cd p2pool-quarkcoin wget http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch patch -p1 < p2p.quarktoducats.patch
|
|
|
|
coolisbad
|
|
January 17, 2014, 08:09:44 PM |
|
I've tried to adapt Neisklar's https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin to Ducats using this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=214512.0;all and come up with the following patch: http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch .. A couple of things I'm sure are off. At the very least the SUBSIDY_FUNC is entirely wrong. I tried to verify functionality by running in testnet mode, but the Ducats testnet didn't seem to exist (or I messed up). Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100% . It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool ! And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following: git clone https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin cd p2pool-quarkcoin wget http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch patch -p1 < p2p.quarktoducats.patch
I'm testing your pool. I'm running the optimized cpu quark miner with the command: minerd.exe -a quark --url stratum+tcp://0x0a.nl:35858 -u 631obYuQUiU5pVrrMM8RFt2MbRaRn52F9n -p x I'm getting some yay's. Now lets run for 10-15 minutes to see if it pays. [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://0x0a.nl:35858 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] 6 miner threads started, using 'quark' algorithm. [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:03:39] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 4: 696536 hashes, 114.00 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 5: 739053 hashes, 119.07 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 3: 744899 hashes, 120.99 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 1: 744744 hashes, 121.73 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 0: 709755 hashes, 114.35 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 590.15 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 4: 7806 hashes, 121.95 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 2: 746594 hashes, 120.31 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 3: 2039318 hashes, 117.96 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 4: 2135245 hashes, 123.05 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 0: 2000537 hashes, 115.28 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 1: 2089044 hashes, 120.38 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 3: 7911 hashes, 121.69 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 719.77 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 2: 2098518 hashes, 120.94 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 5: 2125358 hashes, 122.47 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 3: 247556 hashes, 113.75 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 5: 265222 hashes, 121.98 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 2: 263142 hashes, 120.97 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 0: 265677 hashes, 122.02 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 1: 262832 hashes, 120.72 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 4: 268708 hashes, 123.41 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 2: 4565563 hashes, 119.00 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 3: 4595685 hashes, 119.59 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 5: 4557893 hashes, 118.61 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 0: 4674615 hashes, 121.65 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 722.97 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 2: 7817 hashes, 122.13 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 4: 4654783 hashes, 121.14 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 1: 4334985 hashes, 112.82 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 4: 2990085 hashes, 118.66 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:05:09] Stratum detected new block [2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 5: 2968015 hashes, 117.48 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 3: 2980882 hashes, 117.99 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 2: 2949748 hashes, 116.76 khash/s [2014-01-17 22:05:09] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 705.35 khash/s (yay!!!)
|
|
|
|
0btc
|
|
January 17, 2014, 08:14:20 PM |
|
I'm testing your pool. .. I'm getting some yay's. I'll run for 10-15 minutes to see if it pays. I'll let you know if it pays Ha, welcome ! Sadly though, payments will only happen when the p2pool network finds a block, and right now, my server is the only p2pool node in existence for this network (unless someone else has patched p2pool as described above and used the same IDENTIFIER and PREFIX hex values) - and of that only p2pool node, we two are the only miners. That means that the two of us only get paid out when either of us finds a block.. If other people start joining the p2pool network, blocks will get found much faster, as will the payouts. (A block found while you have an active share = instant payout) - which is the strength of p2pool. Until then, nothing much happens! Thanks for testing though
|
|
|
|
|