Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 01:20:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: no poll currently
yes - 41 (69.5%)
no - 18 (30.5%)
Total Voters: 59

Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 ... 323 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][LEAF] LEAFCOIN - Android wallet launched  (Read 352573 times)
Last1212
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 05:21:51 AM
 #4701

Toward 0.00000013 BTC soon Smiley

It was predictable, too many people want to sell. When all sell wall coin will be distribute we have a chance to skyrocket.

Some donate will be good))))))
LTC: LLEhzonntRjo4pLqaw93ZQzw8Qdx3HQ2k7        DOGE: DCty26Yk5kbG2NfoknoyY3UajPzsmbhXP9
WDC: WYJW8RYrc3C8K7duaAWqs8YayMLLNEkWBC        CAT: 9nJcehD9dkcsrrVmJxnLJRFc61158nTvvP
1715390407
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715390407

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715390407
Reply with quote  #2

1715390407
Report to moderator
1715390407
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715390407

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715390407
Reply with quote  #2

1715390407
Report to moderator
1715390407
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715390407

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715390407
Reply with quote  #2

1715390407
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715390407
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715390407

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715390407
Reply with quote  #2

1715390407
Report to moderator
damnation
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=434996.0


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2014, 05:50:20 AM
 #4702

I, for one, am truly interested in looking at the result of KWG implementation.

As things stand right now... we will likely need to contact pumpers so that we could push the coin to find a new level.. approximately ever 3 block halvings or so...

But its still early in the game.. the community around LEAF is still in place and mcg your working hard behind the scenes is great for the coin... all told the future is still good..

♔ PrimeDice : The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
Noble:9ZQo8HaeCjporC7T4PFgVcqzXc5KLyGrnV
LOT: LzUoeyakB8DRoHgqMgHSWMzipW5Nr63zkg
BTC: 1EiY4FqGbbfL6VUhiVLe8Z5R7BVVyyLTmw
LTC: LaGJ2utSYG4bhQ882mJ8QkS1bq45p25vcD
C3ALL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:38:25 AM
 #4703

Toward 0.00000013 BTC soon Smiley
Multipools wouldn't mind at that price anyway.

Just stop doing deals with them, the coin will push through to kgm.  May take some time that's all.  Any people who are choosing to keep coins on multipool will then have an example of why their actions damage all coins.

They know that another 240 block wait still won't help, so are just black mailing you every 480 blocks.

What people should do is pull their buy orders and make the coin less profitable, or wait until the diff level jumps to 140 again, then push kimoto out as at that diff level it would take a few days at low hash to complete another 240 blocks.

C3ALL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:48:20 AM
 #4704

There are around 12 more blocks of 240 to get to the kgm fix.

6 of these will take around 40 minutes each because of the rapid increase in miners.  The other 6 may take 1 day each due to high diff.

Another solution may be to try doing deals with themining pools.

I can see that on updamoon and major miners there are some big hash rate miners jump in when diff drops low and dissapear when it goes up again.

If these pools looked for any users connecting to the pool with higher than X hash rate that have not been there for at least 6 hours, and disconnected them, then this would help toward keeping the hash increase at diff change down.

An announcement on the thread here and also in their pool may help.  Or just stop any new stratum connects at diff change.

Though that may upset miners so would be the pools choice.  Though these miners should appreciate why it is being done.

sakkosekk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:13:51 AM
 #4705

imho there are no deals with multipools.

they want the fees and they don't care about anything else.

look at all the fishermen: they are killing whales for a very good reason. Cheesy

thats not completely true... you can make deals with them.

hashcows ie was very cooperative.. they understand the deal with this coin.. and dropped off completely

middlecoin is the only one that is worrysome... but also the one with the largest hashrate.

real businessmen over there... pay up etc.

or fishermen...

middlecoin asked me too much per block to stay off completely... rather i would do a fork then

New respect for hashcows.
splawik21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005


DASH is the future of crypto payments!


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:24:32 AM
Last edit: February 08, 2014, 09:00:25 AM by splawik21
 #4706

There are around 12 more blocks of 240 to get to the kgm fix.

6 of these will take around 40 minutes each because of the rapid increase in miners.  The other 6 may take 1 day each due to high diff.

Another solution may be to try doing deals with themining pools.

I can see that on updamoon and major miners there are some big hash rate miners jump in when diff drops low and dissapear when it goes up again.

If these pools looked for any users connecting to the pool with higher than X hash rate that have not been there for at least 6 hours, and disconnected them, then this would help toward keeping the hash increase at diff change down.

An announcement on the thread here and also in their pool may help.  Or just stop any new stratum connects at diff change.

Though that may upset miners so would be the pools choice.  Though these miners should appreciate why it is being done.

I have to admit that I like your ideas C3all

BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
mmihai1978
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:28:31 AM
 #4707

@mcg - will people lose coins in the fork? i hope not.

i have some (a lot) of leaf in my cryptsy account. I should not be worried, right?
WorldCoinIndex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 106


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2014, 08:40:22 AM
 #4708

Got u guys listed!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=384546.0

BTC:1JVzATpuSvyz889mquf6Y7atUnAYFFUGyg LTC:La7fvvNNN7tBAhD91Emu8Xo77uXE5wUYha
http://worldcoinindex.com/coinrequest
Crypto currency price index
sakkosekk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:40:42 AM
 #4709

@mcg - will people lose coins in the fork? i hope not.

i have some (a lot) of leaf in my cryptsy account. I should not be worried, right?

Everything done before a fork is valid work. If you continue to do work on the wrong fork after the "forking", those coins will not be of any use. Just make sure Cryptsy is on the right fork when you make the transfer.
ontopicplease
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 778
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:45:14 AM
 #4710

Is there any leaf deposit problem at cryptsy.com?

Think so, I had to wait 8 hours yesterday.
mmihai1978
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:01:14 AM
 #4711

there is no problem with cryptsy

there is a problem with the leaf network.

no blocks being found-> no confirmation of transactions.

slow blocks -> slow transactions.

this difficulty issue is very far reaching.

kgw is just so beautiful you will cry for joy when you see it in action.
mcg (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:08:24 AM
 #4712

There are around 12 more blocks of 240 to get to the kgm fix.

6 of these will take around 40 minutes each because of the rapid increase in miners.  The other 6 may take 1 day each due to high diff.

Another solution may be to try doing deals with themining pools.

I can see that on updamoon and major miners there are some big hash rate miners jump in when diff drops low and dissapear when it goes up again.

If these pools looked for any users connecting to the pool with higher than X hash rate that have not been there for at least 6 hours, and disconnected them, then this would help toward keeping the hash increase at diff change down.

An announcement on the thread here and also in their pool may help.  Or just stop any new stratum connects at diff change.

Though that may upset miners so would be the pools choice.  Though these miners should appreciate why it is being done.

just wanna react to this... the calcs are way off when i stop doing deals with middlecoin...

they just throw 22ghash at us... instead of 5. and that would be the end of it( . i pay 2 million for each 240 block to stay off ( out of my own pocket ).

i can sustain this 10 days... so i have 20 million ( i recently bought ).

when i dont pay up.. they point 22ghash at us and it would make round time so high that other miners will leave as well.

we saw it happen before... and we see it again... even with diff 100 ppl drop off. 22ghash -> diff over 150

there is no other way. except updating.... aar. and i are looking into a method to discard shares of miners ( pools ) having more then 50% of the network.

we will update you shortly

mmihai1978
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:11:55 AM
 #4713

aar. and i are looking into a method to discard shares of miners ( pools ) having more then 50% of the network.


i see a circular reference here (because network hash rate is a moving target), pls make sure you don't end up discarding all shares.
mcg (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:16:03 AM
 #4714

aar. and i are looking into a method to discard shares of miners ( pools ) having more then 50% of the network.


i see a circular reference here, pls make sure you don't end up discarding all shares.

yes, we just might do the kgw block update.

its safest, easiest and very fast to implement.

18323 might be the blocknumber of implementation

cheers
mmihai1978
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:18:09 AM
 #4715

hallelujah! \o/
mcg (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:20:46 AM
 #4716

hallelujah! \o/

that will give us 36-48 hours to update.

a fast update of users will be done using a update-giveaway

pools, exchanges will be contacted immediately after launch by private msg/email

cryptsy will respond very fast to this.

your irc name will include network proto version

so we can check if you updated or not based on your ip.

you need to run with irc = ON.
Euphonious
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:21:55 AM
 #4717

aar. and i are looking into a method to discard shares of miners ( pools ) having more then 50% of the network.


i see a circular reference here, pls make sure you don't end up discarding all shares.

yes, we just might do the kgw block update.

its safest, easiest and very fast to implement.

18323 might be the blocknumber of implementation

cheers

I think this is the best plan.
JimmiJam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:28:13 AM
 #4718

Hi
  Any sign of that OSX wallet gravity fix? Will that be it for wallet updates for a while or need we do something else soon too?

Thanks for all the hard work guys

JJ
mcg (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:31:27 AM
 #4719

Hi
  Any sign of that OSX wallet gravity fix? Will that be it for wallet updates for a while or need we do something else soon too?

Thanks for all the hard work guys

JJ

yes this time the osx wallet will come available with 12hours
NiceFace
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 09:33:48 AM
 #4720

@mcg - will people lose coins in the fork? i hope not.

i have some (a lot) of leaf in my cryptsy account. I should not be worried, right?

Everything done before a fork is valid work. If you continue to do work on the wrong fork after the "forking", those coins will not be of any use. Just make sure Cryptsy is on the right fork when you make the transfer.

What is it mean? This mean that I should keep my LeafCoin on Cryptsy till "fork"? Or LeafCoins are safe on my wallet?
Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 ... 323 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!