Hey I found a vulnerability. If a cat is left near the pizza then a pie can't be spent/eaten anymore, unless the user is disgusting.
Reference:
That's a great point, BUT the fact still remains that there are more honest cats than dishonest cats. Plus, we may want to consider Proof of Pizza as a possible way to test sentient intelligence (if a cat can take it's own photo with a photo of the last pizza that was added to the pie, we should give it credit).
We can call those orphaned pizzas
We also must assume that anyone who is using the Proof-of-Pizza algo will be conscious enough to provide ample anti-cat measures. Such measures include field mice, mouse traps, and dogs.
"But dogs will eat your pizza even faster!" you say. Well, maybe maybe not. Dogs can be leashed and thus avoiding the age old delemia
This brings the buttered cat paradox to mind.
We need to seriously consider the innovative design behind PoP being the fact that it can be insta-mined and it *IS* the first known working method to feed a developer (proof of development PoD) and will keep their bellies full. It allows anyone to participate, and is ALREADY smart AND dumb phone compatible, anyone wiht a camera can do it or even anyone with the ability to draw a circle depicting their pizza (assuming they provide valid proof of purchase/proof of partaking in a meal), and actually I think we could even say XKCD could get in on the pizza hashing action with their creative depiction of their developers eating pizza.
But also,this brings up a more valid point. I need to finish that white paper. It's actually sitting half complete somewhere.
Hey I found a vulnerability. If a cat is left near the pizza then a pie can't be spent/eaten anymore, unless the user is disgusting.
Hm, true. But at least then you have a cat to butcher.
hahahahaa. this came to mind instantly
