Bitcoin Forum
January 24, 2017, 07:43:17 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: adg  (Read 2525 times)
Anonymous
Guest

adg
July 18, 2010, 12:20:04 AM
 #1

adgf
1485286997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1485286997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1485286997
Reply with quote  #2

1485286997
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1485286997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1485286997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1485286997
Reply with quote  #2

1485286997
Report to moderator
Anonymous
Guest

July 18, 2010, 01:48:21 AM
 #2

Say, the last 6 hours? They seem few and far between, maybe just a couple per hour? Confirmations are taking a long time. Did the super node take his computers offline?

http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php

That says the last block was found over 50 minutes ago.

Maybe he pushed the difficulty level so high it will take a bit for the remaining nodes to generate?Apparently his supernode was doing the majority of the generating at one point.I would be interested if he posts on the forum or someone gets in contact with him how his experiment went?

 Cheesy
mtgox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2010, 01:50:42 AM
 #3

How often does the difficulty get adjusted?

Quantumplation
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
July 18, 2010, 03:23:03 AM
 #4

The difficulty gets reevaluated and adjusted every 2016 blocks.

Against my better judgement... 1ADjszXMSRuAUjyy3ShFRy54SyRVrNDgDc
MacRohard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103


View Profile
July 18, 2010, 03:24:28 AM
 #5

I created a realtime graph of the current block generation speed here;

http://titania.smutfairy.com/~rm/time.gif
mtgox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2010, 03:12:06 PM
 #6

MacRohard: Cool graph. It would be nice if it should time on the x axis and number of blocks on the y

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
July 18, 2010, 11:35:27 PM
 #7

Nice graph!  A moving average to smooth it out would be nice.

http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php says 212 blocks in the last 24 hours, or 8.8 per hour.
lachesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
July 19, 2010, 12:28:24 AM
 #8

Satoshi, why does difficulty adjust so rarely? It would seem to me that it would be better to adjust once every 50 blocks or so.

Bitcoin Calculator | Scallion | GPG Key | WoT Rating | 1QGacAtYA7E8V3BAiM7sgvLg7PZHk5WnYc
MacRohard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103


View Profile
July 19, 2010, 03:13:04 PM
 #9

@satoshi, I've change it to plot the last 127 blocks and also it gives you the average of those 127.
ByteCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 416


View Profile
July 19, 2010, 04:07:23 PM
 #10

Thanks for the statistics.

Transactions in block 68477 took under 3 minutes to get confirmed but transactions in block 68780 took over two hours!

The fact that a merchant can't tell a customer accurately how long they have to wait to get their goods will be a major barrier to adoption of the current scheme.

I think this is the most persuasive reason for changing to a fixed block generation scheme as outlined in

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425.0

ByteCoin
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2010, 10:20:52 PM
 #11

It's not that big of a deal really. When you buy something it often ships the next day. For trading on the exchanges the coins have already cleared so that isn't a problem either. I guess it could be annoying if you had to wait to get a software code or something instead of it being instant.

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
mizerydearia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
July 20, 2010, 09:11:49 PM
 #12

I updated http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php

I determined that using timestamps generated from computer upon noticing a new block as discovered was unreliable: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464.0

Statistics now use data directly from the database file block0001.dat

The code for statistix.php is documented at http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402.msg3395#msg3395

Interestingly, I notice that some blocks discovered have a negative time to discovery.

example:
Code:
-116 seconds to find block 67591
Some Mouse
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47


View Profile
July 20, 2010, 09:39:21 PM
 #13

-186 seconds to find block 69275

heh.
mizerydearia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
July 21, 2010, 12:43:28 AM
 #14

So maybe even the internal timestamps aren't reliable?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!