Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 09:33:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: adg  (Read 10403 times)
Anonymous
Guest

adg
July 18, 2010, 12:20:04 AM
Last edit: September 11, 2011, 05:19:57 PM by davidonpda
 #1

adgf
1715247198
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715247198

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715247198
Reply with quote  #2

1715247198
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Anonymous
Guest

July 18, 2010, 01:48:21 AM
 #2

Say, the last 6 hours? They seem few and far between, maybe just a couple per hour? Confirmations are taking a long time. Did the super node take his computers offline?

http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php

That says the last block was found over 50 minutes ago.

Maybe he pushed the difficulty level so high it will take a bit for the remaining nodes to generate?Apparently his supernode was doing the majority of the generating at one point.I would be interested if he posts on the forum or someone gets in contact with him how his experiment went?

 Cheesy
mtgox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 102


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2010, 01:50:42 AM
 #3

How often does the difficulty get adjusted?

Quantumplation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 18, 2010, 03:23:03 AM
 #4

The difficulty gets reevaluated and adjusted every 2016 blocks.

NOTE: This account was compromised from 2017 to 2021.  I'm in the process of deleting posts not made by me.
MacRohard
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 18, 2010, 03:24:28 AM
 #5

I created a realtime graph of the current block generation speed here;

http://titania.smutfairy.com/~rm/time.gif

mtgox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 102


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2010, 03:12:06 PM
 #6

MacRohard: Cool graph. It would be nice if it should time on the x axis and number of blocks on the y

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 6723


View Profile
July 18, 2010, 11:35:27 PM
 #7

Nice graph!  A moving average to smooth it out would be nice.

http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php says 212 blocks in the last 24 hours, or 8.8 per hour.
lachesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 104


View Profile
July 19, 2010, 12:28:24 AM
 #8

Satoshi, why does difficulty adjust so rarely? It would seem to me that it would be better to adjust once every 50 blocks or so.

Bitcoin Calculator | Scallion | GPG Key | WoT Rating | 1QGacAtYA7E8V3BAiM7sgvLg7PZHk5WnYc
MacRohard
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 19, 2010, 03:13:04 PM
 #9

@satoshi, I've change it to plot the last 127 blocks and also it gives you the average of those 127.

ByteCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 416
Merit: 277


View Profile
July 19, 2010, 04:07:23 PM
 #10

Thanks for the statistics.

Transactions in block 68477 took under 3 minutes to get confirmed but transactions in block 68780 took over two hours!

The fact that a merchant can't tell a customer accurately how long they have to wait to get their goods will be a major barrier to adoption of the current scheme.

I think this is the most persuasive reason for changing to a fixed block generation scheme as outlined in

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425.0

ByteCoin
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2010, 10:20:52 PM
 #11

It's not that big of a deal really. When you buy something it often ships the next day. For trading on the exchanges the coins have already cleared so that isn't a problem either. I guess it could be annoying if you had to wait to get a software code or something instead of it being instant.

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
mizerydearia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 507



View Profile
July 20, 2010, 09:11:49 PM
 #12

I updated http://nullvoid.org/bitcoin/statistix.php

I determined that using timestamps generated from computer upon noticing a new block as discovered was unreliable: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464.0

Statistics now use data directly from the database file block0001.dat

The code for statistix.php is documented at http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402.msg3395#msg3395

Interestingly, I notice that some blocks discovered have a negative time to discovery.

example:
Code:
 -116 seconds to find block 67591
Some Mouse
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 20, 2010, 09:39:21 PM
 #13

-186 seconds to find block 69275

heh.
mizerydearia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 507



View Profile
July 21, 2010, 12:43:28 AM
 #14

So maybe even the internal timestamps aren't reliable?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!