delete

[Cosbycoin]

Where's CH?  Wasn't he just talkin smack?

Oh I think I see him

I wouldn't be surprised if he releases SC 2.0 in like a year after BCX forgets about all of this.

[kano]

So the SolidCoin network is going down because the person who started it up says so.

HAHAHAHAHHA

Geez people must be fools - why not just ignore him and keep running your current network?

Or even, run the current network with the new client - oops sorry can't do that coz he doesn't want you to and has hard coded stuff into the new client to stop you from doing that - and for NO OTHER REASON.
There are no grounds to do that.

There is no reason to actually delete the block-chain other than the fact that he wants lots of solid coins.

(he obviously didn't think of this until he saw the GG block-chain)

[Cosbycoin]

So the SolidCoin network is going down because the person who started it up says so.

HAHAHAHAHHA

Geez people must be fools - why not just ignore him and keep running your current network?

I agree. Why stop just because one person says so. Sounds like centralization as opposed to decentralization.

[johnj]

I think I know where he went.

To go check if he is still able to prop up the price

[Binford 6100]

(microwaving popcorn)

 

hell yeah!

[Lolcust]

Do I read it right that Coin Protecshun Fund will be formed by taking some of the coins miners generate and sending them to a third party "as protecshun paymnt" ?

[kano]

LOL WHAT!

Didn't notice this before (not even sure why I bothered to look just now but anyway)

CoinHunter's sig

"SolidCoin - The Faster and more stable alternative to Bitcoin
SolidCoin is ready for the Bitcoin Collapse"

Oh that's funny - nice joke there
So stable it's going down already ... to start again.
I'd almost call that a ... collapse

[Lolcust]

Should I put "geist geld ready for solidcoin collapse" in my sig, lol ?

[Binford 6100]

Should I put "geist geld ready for solidcoin collapse" in my sig, lol ?

please, do so.
the more forks are "ready for the bitcoin collapse" the better
security by redundancy

[Lolcust]

Should I put "geist geld ready for solidcoin collapse" in my sig, lol ?

please, do so.
the more forks are "ready for the bitcoin collapse" the better
security by redundancy

Oh, I can't attest as to Geist's readiness for Bitcoin collapse (due to Bitcoin "collapse" being largely a hypothetical catastrophe of epic proportions), but it is sure as hell ready for (another) SolidCoin collapse.

[Lupus_Yonderboy]

[Lolcust]

As I have not received any comment as to (quite sincere) question about implementation of "Protekshun phund", I shall repeat it.

Do I read it right that Coin Protecshun Fund will be formed by taking some of the coins miners generate and sending them to a third party "as protecshun paymnt" ?

[simonk83]

I will vouch for his firepower. I watched him take down the GG network and throw blocks around like it was popcorn. Made difficulty go down to 0.06 for over an hour...he is serious.

Even if he has a lot of mining power (Unlikely as it is) it's irrelevant to new SC. He cannot do anything, wouldn't matter if he had 99% of mining power.

Believe the known liar as much as you want, he's clueless.

Says the guy who's fucked up a whole bunch of iterations of his "awesome" coin and now has to start from scratch.   

Seriously, you're embarrassing yourself.   Stick to your own forum where people are at least stupid enough to believe you.

Who cares anymore.

[Lolcust]

I am very interested as to the racket algorithm known as "protecshun fund" that is claimed to become part of new solidcoin.

I, too, want to mine coinsiz with other people's electricity

[BCEmporium]

Hold a second! WTF is that "SC 2.0"?!
Start over?!

Solidcoin goes straight to my shitlist! Could be interesting but its developers are totally postal, erratic and pathetic.

[Lolcust]

I don't mind the restart that much per se (and the compensation proposal is technically plausible, one has to admit), but taking a % of newly mined stuff into some fund (even assuming it will be used to do useful stuff) rubs me very wrong way (after all, it was the miner's time and electricity, no? )

[mikethebodacious]

Love your sig Lolcust.  All Bitcoin forks are a scam, I'm sure Satoshi has a lot of BTC but at least it's decentralized unlike all these new cryptocurrencies.  Bitcoin has a lot going for it still, even if it were to collapse it would take a few years imo unless market manipulators are as viscious as most posters here make them out to be.

[Binford 6100]

which part of the mafia style protection 'voluntary' funding did you not understand?
: )))

[shads]

I don't mind the restart that much per se (and the compensation proposal is technically plausible, one has to admit), but taking a % of newly mined stuff into some fund (even assuming it will be used to do useful stuff) rubs me very wrong way (after all, it was the miner's time and electricity, no? )

What wrong with that?  It's just taxation... Oh hang on, that means there's a solidcoin government

President Solid?

[Lolcust]

Love your sig Lolcust.  All Bitcoin forks are a scam, I'm sure Satoshi has a lot of BTC but at least it's decentralized unlike all these new cryptocurrencies.  Bitcoin has a lot going for it still, even if it were to collapse it would take a few years imo unless market manipulators are as viscious as most posters here make them out to be.

Personally, I have nothing against Solidcoin (and nothing against the reset except the "protecshun fund" which sounds  as close to a honest to Cthulhu racket as a digital currency can get)

I do have something against that "ready for Bitcoin collapse" article, though.

P.S.:

I also have something against fork-hate

Ya know, at least Namecoin is a very useful and innovative fork (I do  hope for  Geist to get as useful as innovative as it can, after all, it has already taught the knowledgeable folks around here some interesting things, and I hope it will go on doing so...that, and fuel my UniLaundry   )