Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 07:25:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [2014-01-31] Forbes - Silk Road Vendor Filing Claim For Seized Bitcoins  (Read 2598 times)
btcmad1337 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 10:53:56 PM
 #1

http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2014/01/31/silk-road-vendor-filing-claim-for-seized-bitcoins-argues-he-sold-only-legal-items/

Quote
On Thursday, Ward began the process of retaining a lawyer to file a claim for what he says were 100 bitcoins–worth around $95,000 at current exchange rates–seized by the FBI in the takedown of the Silk Road online black market for drugs last October. Unlike most of Silk Road’s sellers, Ward says he earned his bitcoins through entirely legal means, offering the same merchandise that he advertises on the public Internet from his head shop Planet Pluto in Devon, England.

There were many legal sellers on Silk Road. I had money on deposit on SR at the time of the seizure for coin mixing purposes as the SR mixer was huge and provided a pretty good protection against taint analysis for the cost of transaction fees only. If my deposit was worth more I'd be doing the same thing.

Go PlutoPete! I'm so happy that it's him who decided to fight this. For those who don't know, PlutoPete was well known on SR he sold pipes, papers and bongs and had written before about how he registered his Silk Road business with tax authorities in the UK.

Also interesting:

Quote
All of that means the FBI, who were in communication with the NCA, should have considered Ward’s claim to some of the Silk Road bitcoins, according to Steven L. Kessler, an asset forfeiture lawyer who Ward is in the process of retaining. “The statute requires that if the government of the United States has knowledge of an individual with an asset subject to forfeiture, the owner has to get notice,” says Kessler.
1714937131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714937131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714937131
Reply with quote  #2

1714937131
Report to moderator
1714937131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714937131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714937131
Reply with quote  #2

1714937131
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714937131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714937131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714937131
Reply with quote  #2

1714937131
Report to moderator
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2014, 05:46:53 AM
 #2

If totalitarians somehow manage to fail at screwing PlutoPete via guilt by association, they will just "determine" that the only possible definition of a bong, is "illegal drug paraphernalia", even though you can put uncontrolled substances such as tobacco, cloves, or even non-drugs like Coca-Cola in them.

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
Denton
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 01, 2014, 10:16:50 AM
 #3

Good luck to him, i hope he succeeds!

hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
February 01, 2014, 03:26:20 PM
 #4

$95,000? That's a lot of bongs and papers  Grin. Good on him for taking this all the way. It'll be interesting to see the result. Has their been any update on DPRs seized coins?

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
danieldaniel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 01, 2014, 06:45:50 PM
 #5

http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2014/01/31/silk-road-vendor-filing-claim-for-seized-bitcoins-argues-he-sold-only-legal-items/

Quote
On Thursday, Ward began the process of retaining a lawyer to file a claim for what he says were 100 bitcoins–worth around $95,000 at current exchange rates–seized by the FBI in the takedown of the Silk Road online black market for drugs last October. Unlike most of Silk Road’s sellers, Ward says he earned his bitcoins through entirely legal means, offering the same merchandise that he advertises on the public Internet from his head shop Planet Pluto in Devon, England.

There were many legal sellers on Silk Road. I had money on deposit on SR at the time of the seizure for coin mixing purposes as the SR mixer was huge and provided a pretty good protection against taint analysis for the cost of transaction fees only. If my deposit was worth more I'd be doing the same thing.

Go PlutoPete! I'm so happy that it's him who decided to fight this. For those who don't know, PlutoPete was well known on SR he sold pipes, papers and bongs and had written before about how he registered his Silk Road business with tax authorities in the UK.

Also interesting:

Quote
All of that means the FBI, who were in communication with the NCA, should have considered Ward’s claim to some of the Silk Road bitcoins, according to Steven L. Kessler, an asset forfeiture lawyer who Ward is in the process of retaining. “The statute requires that if the government of the United States has knowledge of an individual with an asset subject to forfeiture, the owner has to get notice,” says Kessler.
This is going to be a fun argument to hear.  How many bongs did he sell to get $95k in revenue?

DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
February 01, 2014, 06:50:40 PM
 #6

For those confused by the $95K number.  Pull up a year long Bitcoin chart.  Lookup exchange rate at the time the silk road was closed.   Multiply that by 1000.  It isn't $95K.
danieldaniel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 01, 2014, 09:55:49 PM
 #7

For those confused by the $95K number.  Pull up a year long Bitcoin chart.  Lookup exchange rate at the time the silk road was closed.   Multiply that by 1000.  It isn't $95K.
Oh, yeah, that makes sense.  I wonder if he kept all of his revenue on SR or if he has a bigger stash offline.

hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 01:35:41 PM
 #8

For those confused by the $95K number.  Pull up a year long Bitcoin chart.  Lookup exchange rate at the time the silk road was closed.   Multiply that by 1000.  It isn't $95K.
Oh, yeah, that makes sense.  I wonder if he kept all of his revenue on SR or if he has a bigger stash offline.

He was pretty silly to keep all that online if he did.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
BTCisthefuture
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 02:41:36 PM
 #9

Sounds like he has somewhat of a valid argument,  but from what I understand selling things like bongs online to Americans is still illegal for the most part. Hence why you don't see many sites offering them to American customers.  So unless he has good records showing which sales went to which countries, good luck.

Hourly bitcoin faucet with a gambling twist !  http://freebitco.in/?r=106463
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195



View Profile
February 02, 2014, 04:04:37 PM
 #10

Sounds like he has somewhat of a valid argument,  but from what I understand selling things like bongs online to Americans is still illegal for the most part. Hence why you don't see many sites offering them to American customers.  So unless he has good records showing which sales went to which countries, good luck.

Selling bongs is illegal in the states? And I'm not sure if he shipped much stuff stateside.
Bitware
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 926
Merit: 1001


weaving spiders come not here


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:50:12 PM
Last edit: February 02, 2014, 07:06:05 PM by Bitware
 #11

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title21/html/USCODE-2010-title21-chap13-subchapI-partD-sec863.htm

Quote
21 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2010 Edition
Title 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS
CHAPTER 13 - DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL
SUBCHAPTER I - CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
Part D - Offenses and Penalties
Sec. 863 - Drug paraphernalia
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§863. Drug paraphernalia
(a) In general
It is unlawful for any person—
(1) to sell or offer for sale drug paraphernalia;
(2) to use the mails or any other facility of interstate commerce to transport drug paraphernalia; or
(3) to import or export drug paraphernalia.
(b) Penalties
Anyone convicted of an offense under subsection (a) of this section shall be imprisoned for not more than three years and fined under title 18.
(c) Seizure and forfeiture
Any drug paraphernalia involved in any violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture upon the conviction of a person for such violation. Any such paraphernalia shall be delivered to the Administrator of General Services, General Services Administration, who may order such paraphernalia destroyed or may authorize its use for law enforcement or educational purposes by Federal, State, or local authorities.
(d) “Drug paraphernalia” defined
The term “drug paraphernalia” means any equipment, product, or material of any kind which is primarily intended or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding, converting, concealing, producing, processing, preparing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, possession of which is unlawful under this subchapter. It includes items primarily intended or designed for use in ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana,1 cocaine, hashish, hashish oil, PCP, methamphetamine, or amphetamines into the human body, such as—
(1) metal, wooden, acrylic, glass, stone, plastic, or ceramic pipes with or without screens, permanent screens, hashish heads, or punctured metal bowls;
(2) water pipes;
(3) carburetion tubes and devices;
(4) smoking and carburetion masks;
(5) roach clips: meaning objects used to hold burning material, such as a marihuana cigarette, that has become too small or too short to be held in the hand;
(6) miniature spoons with level capacities of one-tenth cubic centimeter or less;
(7) chamber pipes;
(Cool carburetor pipes;
(9) electric pipes;
(10) air-driven pipes;
(11) chillums;
(12) bongs;
(13) ice pipes or chillers;
(14) wired cigarette papers; or
(15) cocaine freebase kits.
(e) Matters considered in determination of what constitutes drug paraphernalia
In determining whether an item constitutes drug paraphernalia, in addition to all other logically relevant factors, the following may be considered:
(1) instructions, oral or written, provided with the item concerning its use;
(2) descriptive materials accompanying the item which explain or depict its use;
(3) national and local advertising concerning its use;
(4) the manner in which the item is displayed for sale;
(5) whether the owner, or anyone in control of the item, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products;
(6) direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the item(s) to the total sales of the business enterprise;
(7) the existence and scope of legitimate uses of the item in the community; and
(Cool expert testimony concerning its use.
(f) Exemptions
This section shall not apply to—
(1) any person authorized by local, State, or Federal law to manufacture, possess, or distribute such items; or
(2) any item that, in the normal lawful course of business, is imported, exported, transported, or sold through the mail or by any other means, and traditionally intended for use with tobacco products, including any pipe, paper, or accessory.
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195



View Profile
February 02, 2014, 09:05:07 PM
 #12

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title21/html/USCODE-2010-title21-chap13-subchapI-partD-sec863.htm

Quote
21 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2010 Edition
Title 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS
CHAPTER 13 - DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL
SUBCHAPTER I - CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
Part D - Offenses and Penalties
Sec. 863 - Drug paraphernalia
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§863. Drug paraphernalia
(a) In general
It is unlawful for any person—
(1) to sell or offer for sale drug paraphernalia;
(2) to use the mails or any other facility of interstate commerce to transport drug paraphernalia; or
(3) to import or export drug paraphernalia.
(b) Penalties
Anyone convicted of an offense under subsection (a) of this section shall be imprisoned for not more than three years and fined under title 18.
(c) Seizure and forfeiture
Any drug paraphernalia involved in any violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture upon the conviction of a person for such violation. Any such paraphernalia shall be delivered to the Administrator of General Services, General Services Administration, who may order such paraphernalia destroyed or may authorize its use for law enforcement or educational purposes by Federal, State, or local authorities.
(d) “Drug paraphernalia” defined
The term “drug paraphernalia” means any equipment, product, or material of any kind which is primarily intended or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding, converting, concealing, producing, processing, preparing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, possession of which is unlawful under this subchapter. It includes items primarily intended or designed for use in ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana,1 cocaine, hashish, hashish oil, PCP, methamphetamine, or amphetamines into the human body, such as—
(1) metal, wooden, acrylic, glass, stone, plastic, or ceramic pipes with or without screens, permanent screens, hashish heads, or punctured metal bowls;
(2) water pipes;
(3) carburetion tubes and devices;
(4) smoking and carburetion masks;
(5) roach clips: meaning objects used to hold burning material, such as a marihuana cigarette, that has become too small or too short to be held in the hand;
(6) miniature spoons with level capacities of one-tenth cubic centimeter or less;
(7) chamber pipes;
(Cool carburetor pipes;
(9) electric pipes;
(10) air-driven pipes;
(11) chillums;
(12) bongs;
(13) ice pipes or chillers;
(14) wired cigarette papers; or
(15) cocaine freebase kits.
(e) Matters considered in determination of what constitutes drug paraphernalia
In determining whether an item constitutes drug paraphernalia, in addition to all other logically relevant factors, the following may be considered:
(1) instructions, oral or written, provided with the item concerning its use;
(2) descriptive materials accompanying the item which explain or depict its use;
(3) national and local advertising concerning its use;
(4) the manner in which the item is displayed for sale;
(5) whether the owner, or anyone in control of the item, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products;
(6) direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the item(s) to the total sales of the business enterprise;
(7) the existence and scope of legitimate uses of the item in the community; and
(Cool expert testimony concerning its use.
(f) Exemptions
This section shall not apply to—
(1) any person authorized by local, State, or Federal law to manufacture, possess, or distribute such items; or
(2) any item that, in the normal lawful course of business, is imported, exported, transported, or sold through the mail or by any other means, and traditionally intended for use with tobacco products, including any pipe, paper, or accessory.

Laws are bizarre sometimes. Isn't weed legal in many states now, but drug paraphernalia isn't?
OnkelPaul
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1039
Merit: 1003



View Profile
February 02, 2014, 09:08:26 PM
 #13

Laws are bizarre sometimes.

this.

Onkel Paul

btcmad1337 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 11:23:05 PM
Last edit: February 02, 2014, 11:51:36 PM by btcmad1337
 #14

This is where it gets interesting. This man was in the UK and his dominant market was the EU.

As far as I know the sale of drug paraphenalia is not prohibited in the UK I'm no lawyer however and his business was registered and fully tax-compliant.

Why would US law apply to this?
Why would the US have grounds to seize assets from a legal UK business just because said business is illegal in the US?

(hypothetically) If the reason for the seizure is that its illegal for a non-us citizen to export these products to the US - even though it's perfectly legal to "export" drugs to the US from certain countries, it is however illegal for the other party to "import" them - then shouldn't the burden of proof be put on the US authorities to prove that all of the $95k were proceeds from exporting goods to the US? I don't think they have the right to just seize the whole lot. Thats like the US seizing my bank accounts and house for exporting a $0.50 packet of rolling papers to the US, they should have to account for the amount that were illegal proceeds.

About the $95k figure, PlutoPete was a mega-seller - in the top 100 on SR by sales volume and he was a seller on SR for many years. The funds were also worth 9x less at the time of seizure as mentioned.
Bitware
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 926
Merit: 1001


weaving spiders come not here


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 11:59:20 PM
 #15

This is where it gets interesting. This man was in the UK and his dominant market was the EU.

As far as I know the sale of drug paraphenalia is not prohibited in the UK I'm no lawyer however and his business was registered and fully tax-compliant.

Why would US law apply to this?
Why would the US have grounds to seize assets from a legal UK business just because said business is illegal in the US?

(hypothetically) If the reason for the seizure is that its illegal for a non-us citizen to export these products to the US - even though it's perfectly legal to "export" drugs to the US from certain countries, it is however illegal for the other party to "import" them - then shouldn't the burden of proof be put on the US authorities to prove that all of the $95k were proceeds from exporting goods to the US? I don't think they have the right to just seize the whole lot. Thats like the US seizing my bank accounts and house for exporting a $0.50 packet of rolling papers to the US, they should have to account for the amount that were illegal proceeds.

About the $95k figure, PlutoPete was a mega-seller - in the top 100 on SR by sales volume and he was a seller on SR for many years. The funds were also worth 9x less at the time of seizure as mentioned.

Fruit of the poison tree. Silk Road was unlawful from the get-go. The vendor was a part of the mechanism that allowed Silk Road to commit crime and profit. Does not help that vendor sold drug novelty and usage items to users in a drug market where there is a high likelihood they would use them with the other drugs they purchased there. The jump is a baby step.

What they want does not pass the normal rational person test.
btcmad1337 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 12:14:20 AM
 #16

The vendor was a part of the mechanism that allowed Silk Road to commit crime and profit.

A very interesting argument but one could argue that a lot of other people/things were part of the mechanism that allowed SR to commit crime and make profit.

Why don't they go after the hosting company, what about the people who wrote the operating system and web server software that allowed them to distribute the website?
What about the hardware manufacturers such as Apple who's devices allowed users to make the purchases? If it wasn't for those people SR would not have been able to commit crime or make profit.

Does not help that vendor sold drug novelty and usage items to users in a drug market where there is a high likelihood they would use them with the other drugs they purchased there.

I'm not sure it's illegal to sell something that has a high probability to be used illegally. By that logic the US should make guns illegal because they have a high probability to be used to commit murder. Considering research shows that approximately 50% of internet traffic is pirated material they should also ban the internet.

And is it the vendors job to ensure that the business he is working with is not allowing criminal activity?

For example, eBay. What if eBay allowed drugs to be sold tomorrow? Is it my job as a vendor on eBay to ensure that they are not allowing illegal transactions to happen? So my money from legal sales could be seized if eBay were allowing drug sales?

eBay allow the sale of drug paraphenalia btw. Atleast on ebay.co.uk
Kenshin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 12:15:46 AM
 #17

I hope he win too.  Smiley
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2014, 12:17:12 AM
 #18

This is where it gets interesting. This man was in the UK and his dominant market was the EU.

As far as I know the sale of drug paraphenalia is not prohibited in the UK I'm no lawyer however and his business was registered and fully tax-compliant.

Why would US law apply to this?
Why would the US have grounds to seize assets from a legal UK business just because said business is illegal in the US?

(hypothetically) If the reason for the seizure is that its illegal for a non-us citizen to export these products to the US - even though it's perfectly legal to "export" drugs to the US from certain countries, it is however illegal for the other party to "import" them - then shouldn't the burden of proof be put on the US authorities to prove that all of the $95k were proceeds from exporting goods to the US? I don't think they have the right to just seize the whole lot. Thats like the US seizing my bank accounts and house for exporting a $0.50 packet of rolling papers to the US, they should have to account for the amount that were illegal proceeds.

About the $95k figure, PlutoPete was a mega-seller - in the top 100 on SR by sales volume and he was a seller on SR for many years. The funds were also worth 9x less at the time of seizure as mentioned.

Fruit of the poison tree. Silk Road was unlawful from the get-go. The vendor was a part of the mechanism that allowed Silk Road to commit crime and profit. Does not help that vendor sold drug novelty and usage items to users in a drug market where there is a high likelihood they would use them with the other drugs they purchased there. The jump is a baby step.

What they want does not pass the normal rational person test.

I do not think it means what you think it means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

As long as Silk Road allowed 100% legal worldwide items, any lawful seller is only guilty by association, which is an indefensible totalitarian term. How long until every lawful seller on craigslist needs to fear prosecution for guilt by association, then?

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
jl2012
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1093


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 04:37:56 PM
 #19

Shouldn't they claim it BEFORE the forfeiture order is made? They have more than 2 months to make the claim. The court made the forfeiture order because no one claimed the bitcoin. Isn't it too late now?

p.s. DPR's personal coins are not (yet) forfeited because he made a claim

Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
Bitware
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 926
Merit: 1001


weaving spiders come not here


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 10:33:01 PM
 #20

This is where it gets interesting. This man was in the UK and his dominant market was the EU.

As far as I know the sale of drug paraphenalia is not prohibited in the UK I'm no lawyer however and his business was registered and fully tax-compliant.

Why would US law apply to this?
Why would the US have grounds to seize assets from a legal UK business just because said business is illegal in the US?

(hypothetically) If the reason for the seizure is that its illegal for a non-us citizen to export these products to the US - even though it's perfectly legal to "export" drugs to the US from certain countries, it is however illegal for the other party to "import" them - then shouldn't the burden of proof be put on the US authorities to prove that all of the $95k were proceeds from exporting goods to the US? I don't think they have the right to just seize the whole lot. Thats like the US seizing my bank accounts and house for exporting a $0.50 packet of rolling papers to the US, they should have to account for the amount that were illegal proceeds.

About the $95k figure, PlutoPete was a mega-seller - in the top 100 on SR by sales volume and he was a seller on SR for many years. The funds were also worth 9x less at the time of seizure as mentioned.

Fruit of the poison tree. Silk Road was unlawful from the get-go. The vendor was a part of the mechanism that allowed Silk Road to commit crime and profit. Does not help that vendor sold drug novelty and usage items to users in a drug market where there is a high likelihood they would use them with the other drugs they purchased there. The jump is a baby step.

What they want does not pass the normal rational person test.

I do not think it means what you think it means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

As long as Silk Road allowed 100% legal worldwide items, any lawful seller is only guilty by association, which is an indefensible totalitarian term. How long until every lawful seller on craigslist needs to fear prosecution for guilt by association, then?

Thanks for the correction on the poison tree. I meant to show a solid connection and mutually beneficial business relationship between vendor and Silk Road.

It's much more than guilt by association. It's connected businesses working at an illegal marketplace who could not exist without mutual benefit for illegal profit. Said profits from all vendors were used to support every facet of this illegal marketplace from inception to seizure. Every Bitcoin connected is unlawful proceeds.

Craigslist is legal. Silk Road was not. I stand by my opinions on how the government will act in defense of this claim.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!