50Ksol/s 620W, Innosilicon announces World Best Equihash Miner A9 ZMaster

[Inno_ASIC]

50Ksol/s 620W, Innosilicon announces World Best Equihash Miner A9 ZMaster ready for shipment

Innosilicon, the worldwide leader in one stop shop of crypto currency mining ASICs, just unveiled another record breaking innovation in addition to its recent industry leading BTC T2 miners, the new Equihash miner, A9 ZMaster with 50ksol/s, 620W at the wall. A few times better than any  competition, it will for sure lead the foreseeable future market with unbeatable performance.

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster offers fantastic mining experience for all to protect the network against the potential 51% attack from the elusive GPUs and hash monopoly. This dedicated hardware has much lower operating cost, higher ROI and longevity than any alternatives. It has a small form factor, low noise, and extremely stable performance, designed to help network decentralization with renewed energy and loyalty. Innosilicon will also make its ASICs available for the mining community for miner DIY along with batch two sales to further ensure network decentralization.
 
A9 ZMaster is in stock and ready to ship right away based on payment order with limited quantity. The sales price is $9999 shipping from Hong Kong starting June 10th based on payment sequence. The 1st 300 batch one customers will receive free shipping and free PSU. Hosting service is optional. Batch one shipment will end on June 25th as long as stock lasts. Batch two shipment starts on August 15th with ASICs offering.

A9 Zmaster is the most profitable miner today. Be sure to be the 1st to own. We believe Batch One customers will enjoy great mining experience with little competition for a few months, as it will take a few months for anyone  to be able to produce another decent batch after this limited shipment anyway.

The demo video is as below，please enjoy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD_upaOLaH4

News from http://www.innosilicon.com/html/news/26.html

[1715459274]

1715459274

[1715459274]

1715459274

[1715459274]

1715459274

[1715459274]

1715459274

[1715459274]

1715459274

[1715459274]

1715459274

[sikke1]

Small 100pcs 1070TI nvidia farm with 600W for only 9999$. Batch1 at 15000KSol/s  is roughly 30% Nanopools ZEC Hashrate or 7% of Flypools ZEC hashrate.

[Inno_ASIC]

50Ksol/s 620W, the record breaking innovation #Zcash miner A9 ZMaster is ready for shipment! The 1st 300 batch one customers will receive free shipping and free PSU! 
Buy now from http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

[markiz73]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432819.0
the forum already has this topic, you do not need to produce duplicates

[not.you]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432819.0
the forum already has this topic, you do not need to produce duplicates

Yeah but technically this one is the official announcement from the manufacturer.

Also, the other thread mentioned an MOQ of 100, looks to me like the website allows you to buy a single unit.  That's an important thing to note.  If it ships in 2 days and does 50k sols and it isn't a fire hazard and doesn't break right away, oh and also doesn't need a near constant babysitting to keep working properly, then hell it might be worth it.

...to protect the network against the potential 51% attack from the elusive GPUs and hash monopoly.

What is that a confession?  Nobody believes "elusive GPUs" were behind the recent 51% attacks on equihash coins.  Meanwhile, oh look you have this massive asic miner all built and ready to go and nobody knew about it.

[Kahooli]

. The sales price is $9999 shipping from Hong Kong starting June 10th based on payment sequence. The 1st 300 batch one customers will receive free shipping and free PSU. Hosting service is optional. Batch one shipment will end on June 25th as long as stock lasts. Batch two shipment starts on August 15th with ASICs offering.
News from http://www.innosilicon.com/html/news/26.html

Can you please confirm MOQ (minimum order quantity) and just how many You will be shipping in Batch 1, and project to ship in batch 2?

[cod3gen]

Powerful miner.. To bad about the MOQ.

[martyroz]

A9 Zmaster is the most profitable miner today. Be sure to be the 1st to own. We believe Batch One customers will enjoy great mining experience with little competition for a few months, as it will take a few months for anyone  to be able to produce another decent batch after this limited shipment anyway.

Interesting.

[Pitmains]

Powerful miner.. To bad about the MOQ.

The previous post said the MOQ has changed.

[not.you]

Why are you people on about an MOQ?  The only mention of an MOQ with this miner was from a forum person in the other thread.  Innosilicon has said nothing about an MOQ and if you go to their website you can order the friggin thing right now with a quantity of 1, a fact I mentioned 5 posts up from this one.  

[farmerjake]

I wish inno would start releasing miners that are actual competition to bitmain. Yes this is more efficient sols/watt but a $10k usd price is silly. Zero chance at break even for anyone other than those with the cheapest $.02-$.04/kwh power.

[KaydenC]

I wish inno would start releasing miners that are actual competition to bitmain. Yes this is more efficient sols/watt but a $10k usd price is silly. Zero chance at break even for anyone other than those with the cheapest $.02-$.04/kwh power.

The only thing that matters is price/performance, efficiency and how quickly this thing will depreciate.

It's no difference, 10k sols at $2k, 50k sols at $10k or 100k sols at $20k.

High risk high reward. Alternatively you could wait. This miner should be available at $1.2k when it makes $5 a day in the future (like the A5 dashmaster).

[Inno_ASIC]

Powerful miner.. To bad about the MOQ.

Hello thank you for your comment. A9 is no MOQ, you can order what amount you want. Thank you~

[jmigdlc99]

Not a fan with how Innosilicon deals with customer service, as evident in their previous threads also posted on this forum

The $10,000 price tag on this ASIC is steep and anyone buying it would be taking a HUGE risk. If equihash forks, thats $10k down the drain because Innosilicon will not care about you. They've made that clear with their poor after sales service. Just google some reviews, Innosilicon is BAD for business.

[2stout]

True ROI should be interesting since difficulty increases are rarely projected and factored in by manufacturers.

[Longsnowsm]

I am having my doubts there will be an ROI in the future for any equihash miners... looks like a X11 repeat of flooded market and coins that look poised to fork.  These miners need to be fpga's going forward so that they stay relevant.

[Inno_ASIC]

A9 Zmaster 1st shippment under way, thank you customers! As a delightful surprise, anyone who bought A9 is entitled to a free T2 BTC or A4+ ltc or S11 sia or A5 x11 miners, you choose one model and let us know! Enjoy!

[chris-swiss]

A9 Zmaster 1st shippment under way, thank you customers! As a delightful surprise, anyone who bought A9 is entitled to a free T2 BTC or A4+ ltc or S11 sia or A5 x11 miners, you choose one model and let us know! Enjoy!

All customer on your company have buy d9 , don't trust you for take z9 . If you looking for customer make ROI , you can be have a lot of order .
When you understand that you can't be sell a lot of your asic. Because people have buy d9
and pay 7500 dollars for asic can't make ROI with that price . So customer have money to buy this asic don't want make same as D9.

for me thanks to d9 because now i invest in GPU

[adaseb]

So I guess its thanks to these ASICs why I have had to switch over all my old lagacy Radeon 7950/7970/ R9 280X from Equihash to Cryptonite algo.

Basically in the past, CN was always paying like 30% less than ZEC. And ZEC usually used like 20-25% more power. Hence why I and many other people with these old ass cards kept on ZEC.

However due to these wonderful ASICs it doesn't make sense anymore to mine this algo because you get more with CN and it uses like 20-30% less power in doing so.

I am pretty sure the Nvidia people are feeling the same way.

[markiz73]

I'm sure that when by August-September the miners will get their asics and FPGA and launch them into work on these algorithms, there will be nothing to do with the 79xx and 280 series video cards.

[hawkfish007]

I am impressed, just got a shipping notification 2 days after I placed my A9 order and an email to choose 1 free T2/A4+/S11/A5 and PSU, but shipping was a bit steep at $400 for both. On the other hand still waiting on Bitmain for a Z9 update.

[Littledragons]

Its alright - they are all just mining on your Z9s right now - remember the article about them shipping miners with dust in them?
Yeahhhhh classic bitmain

[markiz73]

I am impressed, just got a shipping notification 2 days after I placed my A9 order and an email to choose 1 free T2/A4+/S11/A5 and PSU, but shipping was a bit steep at $400 for both. On the other hand still waiting on Bitmain for a Z9 update.

Are not you afraid to buy this asic? The Equihash algorithm can repeat the path of the X11 algorithm. Most people in a couple of months have received machines that work only to pay for electricity.

[Longsnowsm]

Its alright - they are all just mining on your Z9s right now - remember the article about them shipping miners with dust in them?
Yeahhhhh classic bitmain

LOL, they are just making sure that they work... They want all customers to have miners that have passed "extensive" burn in testing to ensure the quality of the product. 

[hawkfish007]

I am impressed, just got a shipping notification 2 days after I placed my A9 order and an email to choose 1 free T2/A4+/S11/A5 and PSU, but shipping was a bit steep at $400 for both. On the other hand still waiting on Bitmain for a Z9 update.

Are not you afraid to buy this asic? The Equihash algorithm can repeat the path of the X11 algorithm. Most people in a couple of months have received machines that work only to pay for electricity.

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

[i_like_bits]

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

Kinda weird but I also purchased 4 batch 1 z9's and 1 A9 ZMaster. Great minds must think alike (I hope)? I'm feeling more confident about my A9 purchase and less so about the batch 1 z9's. Bitmain got caught completely flatfooted by the A9 announcement. I think their strategy with only shipping 77 units was so they could get those early customers to hype it up via forums/youtube/blogs so more people buy into batch #2 thinking they're going to be earning as much as the first 77 customers.

Their strategy completely backfired. I think they're rethinking things right now, after all the complaints, and A9 announcement. It also doesn't help when a lot of those first 77 units got into coin devs hands.  I doubt they will give more coupons or double miners for batch #1 customers. I'm guessing firmware update or faster shipping schedule is their only viable option.

[hawkfish007]

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

Kinda weird but I also purchased 4 batch 1 z9's and 1 A9 ZMaster. Great minds must think alike (I hope)? I'm feeling more confident about my A9 purchase and less so about the batch 1 z9's. Bitmain got caught completely flatfooted by the A9 announcement. I think their strategy with only shipping 77 units was so they could get those early customers to hype it up via forums/youtube/blogs so more people buy into batch #2 thinking their going to be earning as much as the first 77 customers.

Their strategy completely backfired. I think they're rethinking things right now, after all the complaints, and A9 announcement. It also doesn't help when a lot of those first 77 units got into coin devs hands.  I doubt they will give more coupons or double miners for batch #1 customers. I'm guessing firmware update or faster shipping schedule is their only viable option.

That's actually weird, but I am glad. I am really disappointed with Bitmain. I was one of the first to order when there was no coupon use allowed but missed the first 77 shipment by 1.3 minutes. I asked if I could use $350 coupon post sale that is on my account, or if they could ship my Z9s early. Apparently Bitmain agreed to none and it seems like next shipment won't start until June 20. More power to A9 until then.

[shaninium]

You cant overclock a inno miner. Bitmain still has an advantage.

[mirny]

Yeah, we can expect another forks, then you bought a vaporware again.

[cryptodunno]

looks like equihash mining on GPU will be dead in few months 

[jmigdlc99]

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

Kinda weird but I also purchased 4 batch 1 z9's and 1 A9 ZMaster. Great minds must think alike (I hope)? I'm feeling more confident about my A9 purchase and less so about the batch 1 z9's. Bitmain got caught completely flatfooted by the A9 announcement. I think their strategy with only shipping 77 units was so they could get those early customers to hype it up via forums/youtube/blogs so more people buy into batch #2 thinking they're going to be earning as much as the first 77 customers.

Their strategy completely backfired. I think they're rethinking things right now, after all the complaints, and A9 announcement. It also doesn't help when a lot of those first 77 units got into coin devs hands.  I doubt they will give more coupons or double miners for batch #1 customers. I'm guessing firmware update or faster shipping schedule is their only viable option.

You're probably forgetting about the price difference. Not many people are willing to shell out $10k for a single A9 that could be rendered useless instantly if devs decide to fork. Many people will still pick the Z9 because at $1.8k it is a more acceptable risk. It is not as efficient than the A9 but it is still better than buying a GPU rig. It seems like it's for more casual miners.

Besides, buying any of these outside of batch 1 is already a bad idea. Innosilicon is probably selling it now because they've mined enough to know profitability will soon tank.

[jhartbarger]

I love how less than 300ppl have bought these so far they thought "Lets throw in one of our overpriced unsaleable unit for free" but charge them $400 to ship it.

[KaydenC]

You're probably forgetting about the price difference. Not many people are willing to shell out $10k for a single A9 that could be rendered useless instantly if devs decide to fork. Many people will still pick the Z9 because at $1.8k it is a more acceptable risk. It is not as efficient than the A9 but it is still better than buying a GPU rig. It seems like it's for more casual miners.

Besides, buying any of these outside of batch 1 is already a bad idea. Innosilicon is probably selling it now because they've mined enough to know profitability will soon tank.

Totally agree. Additionally, 10k for a single A9 is risker than $10k for 5x A9 minis each doing 10k sols because if it breaks the buyer is screwed.

[adaseb]

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

Kinda weird but I also purchased 4 batch 1 z9's and 1 A9 ZMaster. Great minds must think alike (I hope)? I'm feeling more confident about my A9 purchase and less so about the batch 1 z9's. Bitmain got caught completely flatfooted by the A9 announcement. I think their strategy with only shipping 77 units was so they could get those early customers to hype it up via forums/youtube/blogs so more people buy into batch #2 thinking they're going to be earning as much as the first 77 customers.

Their strategy completely backfired. I think they're rethinking things right now, after all the complaints, and A9 announcement. It also doesn't help when a lot of those first 77 units got into coin devs hands.  I doubt they will give more coupons or double miners for batch #1 customers. I'm guessing firmware update or faster shipping schedule is their only viable option.

You're probably forgetting about the price difference. Not many people are willing to shell out $10k for a single A9 that could be rendered useless instantly if devs decide to fork. Many people will still pick the Z9 because at $1.8k it is a more acceptable risk. It is not as efficient than the A9 but it is still better than buying a GPU rig. It seems like it's for more casual miners.

Besides, buying any of these outside of batch 1 is already a bad idea. Innosilicon is probably selling it now because they've mined enough to know profitability will soon tank.

I think Inno is basically hedging that fact. After Bitmain released their Equihash ASIC into the wild they knew that eventually some algos might fork.

Sure it would of been better just mining themselves but with a potential fork, they can sell some units and mine with other units.

Because after ZEC and BTG and other coins fork... who will buy their ASICS? Nobody.

[hawkfish007]

Did anyone receive a tracking number?

[lolchina]

I am actually excited. 1 A9 will free up my 70 1080 Tis so they can mine Lyra2 on NH and 4 batch 1 Z9s will free up my 1070 army for mining something more profitable. These Nvidias were bought last year and they have paid themselves off several times already.

Kinda weird but I also purchased 4 batch 1 z9's and 1 A9 ZMaster. Great minds must think alike (I hope)? I'm feeling more confident about my A9 purchase and less so about the batch 1 z9's. Bitmain got caught completely flatfooted by the A9 announcement. I think their strategy with only shipping 77 units was so they could get those early customers to hype it up via forums/youtube/blogs so more people buy into batch #2 thinking they're going to be earning as much as the first 77 customers.

Their strategy completely backfired. I think they're rethinking things right now, after all the complaints, and A9 announcement. It also doesn't help when a lot of those first 77 units got into coin devs hands.  I doubt they will give more coupons or double miners for batch #1 customers. I'm guessing firmware update or faster shipping schedule is their only viable option.

You're probably forgetting about the price difference. Not many people are willing to shell out $10k for a single A9 that could be rendered useless instantly if devs decide to fork. Many people will still pick the Z9 because at $1.8k it is a more acceptable risk. It is not as efficient than the A9 but it is still better than buying a GPU rig. It seems like it's for more casual miners.

Besides, buying any of these outside of batch 1 is already a bad idea. Innosilicon is probably selling it now because they've mined enough to know profitability will soon tank.

I think Inno is basically hedging that fact. After Bitmain released their Equihash ASIC into the wild they knew that eventually some algos might fork.

Sure it would of been better just mining themselves but with a potential fork, they can sell some units and mine with other units.

Because after ZEC and BTG and other coins fork... who will buy their ASICS? Nobody.

Or it was the other way arround because inno could have minned with them like bitmain is doing now with their z9(regular version not minis)without anyone knowing that but came out with x5 faster asics probably trying to milk them untill the most of coins fork.Bitmain have z9 regular version for sure even Jihan twetted once about them how they will be about x4 faster then minis,anyway glad that there is battle beetweem this 2 so there isnt centralisation

[yrk1957]

You can over-clock 3 Z9 minis to 50kh/s. So compared to 3x Z9 s batch 1 at $6000, this one at $10000 is heavily overpriced.

[i_like_bits]

You can over-clock 3 Z9 minis to 50kh/s. So compared to 3x Z9 s batch 1 at $6000, this one at $10000 is heavily overpriced.

At 1500+ watts, massive increase in db/heat, and a reduced lifespan, yes. The A9 is 650w + 3 week head start for the first, day 1 orders. This is coming from someone who has 4 z9 minis on the way. Also, it's very doubtful, but no one knows if they have contain enough memory for the upcoming 144 equihash parameter tweaks.

[yrk1957]

You can over-clock 3 Z9 minis to 50kh/s. So compared to 3x Z9 s batch 1 at $6000, this one at $10000 is heavily overpriced.

At 1500+ watts, massive increase in db/heat, and a reduced lifespan, yes. The A9 is 650w + 3 week head start for the first, day 1 orders. This is coming from someone who has 4 z9 minis on the way. Also, it's very doubtful, but no one knows if they have contain enough memory for the upcoming 144 equihash parameter tweaks.

Someone measured Z9 at about 380w at 15k, I did not, but mine runs at 54C, fan at 65%. So minimal heat or noise. And at current profit level power is pretty immaterial. It will become an issue much later in life, by then most coins may have already forked.

Edit: And there will be only a week's head start at max, I think, as Bitmain should be shipping rest very soon.

[i_like_bits]

Someone measured Z9 at about 380w at 15k, I did not, but mine runs at 54C, fan at 65%. So minimal heat or noise. And at current profit level power is pretty immaterial. It will become an issue much later in life, by then most coins may have already forked.

Edit: And there will be only a week's head start at max, I think, as Bitmain should be shipping rest very soon.

I have a hard time believing that a 50+% stable overclock results in only 380w @ the wall. That can't be good for the failure rate. You can't overlock inno miners, but they do release firmware updates.  The A9 website says ±6%. The Z9 minis variance was ±5 when announced. What's to say that the A9 doesn't have a lot more to give if Inno allows it?

The absolute soonest bitmain could start shipping these miners is on the 18th. The first few days of shipments would likely be the day 1-3 customers anyways. Realistically people who didn't order in the first few days won't see their miners for 2 weeks at the earliest. 3 weeks is a lot more likely. Their official shipping schedule is from june 20-30th. I'm guessing 1000 units a day which would confirm the rumors of a 10k units in batch 1.

[yrk1957]

Someone measured Z9 at about 380w at 15k, I did not, but mine runs at 54C, fan at 65%. So minimal heat or noise. And at current profit level power is pretty immaterial. It will become an issue much later in life, by then most coins may have already forked.

Edit: And there will be only a week's head start at max, I think, as Bitmain should be shipping rest very soon.

I have a hard time believing that a 50+% stable overclock results in only 380w @ the wall. That can't be good for the failure rate. You can't overlock inno miners, but they do release firmware updates.  The A9 website says ±6%. The Z9 minis variance was ±5 when announced. What's to say that the A9 doesn't have a lot more to give if Inno allows it?

The absolute soonest bitmain could start shipping these miners is on the 18th. The first few days of shipments would likely be the day 1-3 customers anyways. Realistically people who didn't order in the first few days won't see their miners for 2 weeks at the earliest. 3 weeks is a lot more likely. Their official shipping schedule is from june 20-30th. I'm guessing 1000 units a day which would confirm the rumors of a 10k units in batch 1.

I just checked, someone in Z9 thread measured it at 385w at 15k. And I have zero HW errors at 15-16k.

Now Bitmain's is promising a big update by 15th on Z9. My guess is that will ship everything in batch 1 by 20th, max. I think there is a reason why they pushed out few Z9s very early in late May, they were trying to get ahead of Inno A9 (publicly unknown at that point). And in the same light, my guess is everything gets out by 20th.

Leaving this aside, anyone with 5 batch 1 Z9s will hash at 75k at the same price point as A9, that's 50% more. Even a week or two advantage is not enough. I do agree that this argument is a bit mute as while ordering Z9 no one knew about A9, so its all hindsight in a way. But the this does not discount Inno's high pricing on A9 and tactics which they employed on D9s, pretty much a disaster for owners.

Edit: And don't discount a bigger Z9, not mini, being announced soon, hashing at 60k at $4000. Inno has only a month max to sell as many A9s it want at current price. Next revision will be to $3500 as soon as a bigger Z9 is announced.

[SlushPool official]

Hello, Slush Pool here.

Has anyone tried this beast on our pool? We would really appreciate some feedback.

Either here or through our support system: https://support.slushpool.com/conversation/new

Thank you!

[i_like_bits]

Hello, Slush Pool here.

Has anyone tried this beast on our pool? We would really appreciate some feedback.

Either here or through our support system: https://support.slushpool.com/conversation/new

Thank you!

Will gladly test my unit when it arrives on monday. Only willing to dedicate ~20 min or so if the rejection rate is too high however. Will provide the logs though.

[SlushPool official]

Hello, Slush Pool here.

Has anyone tried this beast on our pool? We would really appreciate some feedback.

Either here or through our support system: https://support.slushpool.com/conversation/new

Thank you!

Will gladly test my unit when it arrives on monday. Only willing to dedicate ~20 min or so if the rejection rate is too high however. Will provide the logs though.

Sure! That should be enough.

[Littledragons]

Damn the numbers on this will surely change - ATM a 50k at 620watts is around 100 bucks a day.
This is the beginning of a big ol asic dash.... again

[markiz73]

Damn the numbers on this will surely change - ATM a 50k at 620watts is around 100 bucks a day.
This is the beginning of a big ol asic dash.... again

How long will this profit last? The algorithm X11 was the same. At first there were huge profits, then the asics began to work on paying for electricity.

[aussie-revhead]

How many here coughed up the usd9999 for one of these?

I have a few Antminers, nothing special, and none of them have paid off their purchase price yet (and probably never will unless one of the random coins gains value massively).

 

[linepaDRxbv2015]

Wow!Many thanks.I found it pretty impressive!Will explore further.

[backback]

What is the offcial site?? There are 2 saying official seller :facepalm:

[Inno_ASIC]

What is the offcial site?? There are 2 saying official seller :facepalm:

Hello thank you for your interest.

Innosilicon official website is http://www.innosilicon.com/html/product/index.html

Please be careful to check our website and confirm with #Innosilicon official sources before you pay.

Thank you.

[parentibule]

A9 ZMaster after 12 hours:
32605.85 Sol/s
Accepted rate: 73.5% (on NiceHash and nanopool).
PSU fan at 100% all the time making more noise than an airplane (PSU which is totally cold).

With my rigs, accepted rate: 96%.

[Inno_ASIC]

Innosilicon A9 Zmaster Last Promotion
 
The World Most Powerful & Profitable Miner - A9 Zmaster
 
Limited Stock, Last Offer
22rd Jun-28th Jun.
No better Promotion ever, Price go back right after!
 
Buy One and Get One Free!
(also applying to all regular customers who paid before)
 
One A9 shipping right away for instant gain, another free A9 shipping before 5th July.
What are you waiting for? Do not miss out the best mining period with little competition.

Buy now from http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

[marcdal]

'' No better Promotion ever, Price go back right after! ''


Sure i believe you ...

[yrk1957]

A9 ZMaster after 12 hours:
32605.85 Sol/s
Accepted rate: 73.5% (on NiceHash and nanopool).
PSU fan at 100% all the time making more noise than an airplane (PSU which is totally cold).

With my rigs, accepted rate: 96%.

High failure rate on major pools. The Bitmian Z9 over-clocks in a breeze and this one can’t even do it’s rated hashes. No wonder they need a major giveaway promotion.

[shaninium]

There still selling you something that costs them prob less than 500$ to make, they can sell a lot cheaper than 5k a miner. I wonder why they are so desperate all of a sudden, maybe an ibelink equilhash or a larger z9 soon. The z9 overclock ability doesnt help them either.

[jhartbarger]

I am not regretting my Z9 Mini purchase, mine runs at 750mhz with ZERO HW errors and chip temps are 65 across the board, if only someone would do a custom firmware and unlock the higher frequencies and voltages, ADD a rear FAN and this could turn this into a monster....

My X3 that I did the same thing to would run at 330kH and stay at 65 across the board.

So I paid $100 1kH which is what Innosilicon is charging and you have to spend 10k

[nadeaup]

Bought an A9.. still waiting for my “free” miner. Trying to buy a 2nd A9 with June discount.. Innosilicon is so difficult to do business with. They really need to update the website and have a real shopping cart process etc..

[serhanni]

Will we see forks on equihash based coins because of this machines?

[cod3gen]

Will we see forks on equihash based coins because of this machines?

Yepp, some have already forked, and some are right around the corner.

[hawkfish007]

Bought an A9.. still waiting for my “free” miner. Trying to buy a 2nd A9 with June discount.. Innosilicon is so difficult to do business with. They really need to update the website and have a real shopping cart process etc..

Received a shipping notification from DHL a minute ago that my free ($400) S11 and psu will be delivered tomorrow.

[KaydenC]

I am not regretting my Z9 Mini purchase, mine runs at 750mhz with ZERO HW errors and chip temps are 65 across the board, if only someone would do a custom firmware and unlock the higher frequencies and voltages, ADD a rear FAN and this could turn this into a monster....

My X3 that I did the same thing to would run at 330kH and stay at 65 across the board.

So I paid $100 1kH which is what Innosilicon is charging and you have to spend 10k

I got the z9 mini too, but innosilicon clearly has the better deal if we look at fiat.

$10k for 2 units or 100k sols (more like 120k, as they can do 60k each from screenshots). The Z9 mini is $2k for 16.5k sols, or $10k for 82.5k sols with poorer efficiency. But my Z9 is paid with btc at $9.3k, so that feels good.

[cod3gen]

Guide to setup profit switching in Awesome Miner for A9`s.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4547429

[nadeaup]

Did anyone figure out the id/pw to ssh into the Innosilicon A9?

[Inno_ASIC]

Last promotion day reminder!

Dear customers,

A gentle reminder this is the last day for limited A9 Zmaster buy one get one free Promotion. Do not miss the promotional gift (free A9 gift sent out before July 5th). Price will go back right up in 24 hours. Seize the best opportunity to enjoy best period of mining zcash with little competition. http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

[SeriousOne]

Did anyone figure out the id/pw to ssh into the Innosilicon A9?

Just use some IP Scanner, or look in to the admin panel of your router.
There you will see the IP of your A9, just put that in to the adressbar of your browser.

Then it pops up login panel, there you just put:
Username: Admin
Password: Admin

Then you are in the Panel, there you have to chose your pool and you are up and running!

[vincl]

Did anyone figure out the id/pw to ssh into the Innosilicon A9?

Just use some IP Scanner, or look in to the admin panel of your router.
There you will see the IP of your A9, just put that in to the adressbar of your browser.

Then it pops up login panel, there you just put:
Username: Admin
Password: Admin

Then you are in the Panel, there you have to chose your pool and you are up and running!

he asked for SSH access, not webinterface

[cod3gen]

he asked for SSH access, not webinterface

Have you tried root / innot1t2 ?

[cod3gen]

Have any one here tried theyre A9 on Powermining.pw pool? Interested in knowing if you are experiencing any rejected shares and if you are getting your advertised hashrate.

[swogerino]

A lot of home miners I see have switched from Zcash to something else, I also have done this. There is a bad history of ASICS of very few of them managing to ROI, and this is priced very high for a speculative market like the crypto is.

What is expected longevity that you will be in profit with this device ? What if Zec developers decide to fork and to make this a total worthless investment right after 1 or 2 months from the day the person receives it ? To many questions surrounding ASICS miners and sorry but to many idiots buying them too and trying to go for a centralisation, as that is what ASICS miner do centralisation for a relatively small amount of time. I would never buy one.

[gauldicus]

Anyone that buys this wants their head testing, innosillicon are laughing all the way to the bank, this wont even break even with free electricity

[MagicSmoker]

I got the z9 mini too, but innosilicon clearly has the better deal if we look at fiat.

$10k for 2 units or 100k sols (more like 120k, as they can do 60k each from screenshots). The Z9 mini is $2k for 16.5k sols, or $10k for 82.5k sols with poorer efficiency. But my Z9 is paid with btc at $9.3k, so that feels good.

A lot of people are reporting rather high reject rates on the A9 - to the tune of around 30% - and since you don't get paid for bad shares, the A9 isn't quite as powerful as it claims.

Basically, it looks like the price/hash is roughly the same for both of them.

[yrk1957]

I got the z9 mini too, but innosilicon clearly has the better deal if we look at fiat.

$10k for 2 units or 100k sols (more like 120k, as they can do 60k each from screenshots). The Z9 mini is $2k for 16.5k sols, or $10k for 82.5k sols with poorer efficiency. But my Z9 is paid with btc at $9.3k, so that feels good.

A lot of people are reporting rather high reject rates on the A9 - to the tune of around 30% - and since you don't get paid for bad shares, the A9 isn't quite as powerful as it claims.

Basically, it looks like the price/hash is roughly the same for both of them.

Hence the buy one get one free promotion. And seems people have got the message and are staying away.

Next stop, my guess, buy one get two free...

[serhanni]

I got the z9 mini too, but innosilicon clearly has the better deal if we look at fiat.

$10k for 2 units or 100k sols (more like 120k, as they can do 60k each from screenshots). The Z9 mini is $2k for 16.5k sols, or $10k for 82.5k sols with poorer efficiency. But my Z9 is paid with btc at $9.3k, so that feels good.

A lot of people are reporting rather high reject rates on the A9 - to the tune of around 30% - and since you don't get paid for bad shares, the A9 isn't quite as powerful as it claims.

Basically, it looks like the price/hash is roughly the same for both of them.

Hence the buy one get one free promotion. And seems people have got the message and are staying away.

Next stop, my guess, buy one get two free...

Yeah, like baikal's promotion after monero announced the fork for fighting asics. Baikal said "buy one get 5 for free"

[SeriousOne]

We got 3 pieces now, and they worked all well.

But now after transport&network change one won't work anymore, it is looping at "tunning".
Sometime later it just restart also.

Here are some logs:

Code:

Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Linux version 4.14.0-xilinx (yex@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version 6.4.0 (Buildroot 2018.02.1)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jun 9 09:42:21 CST 2018
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU: ARMv7 Processor [413fc090] revision 0 (ARMv7), cr=18c5387d
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: OF: fdt: Machine model: xlnx,zynq-7000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: cma: Reserved 16 MiB at 0x0f000000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 65536
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c0a3b940, node_mem_map cedf0000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Normal zone: 512 pages used for memmap
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Normal zone: 0 pages reserved
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Normal zone: 65536 pages, LIFO batch:15
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: random: fast init done
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: percpu: Embedded 16 pages/cpu @cedc7000 s35276 r8192 d22068 u65536
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pcpu-alloc: s35276 r8192 d22068 u65536 alloc=16*4096
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 [0] 1
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 65024
n 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Kernel command line: console=ttyPS0,115200 noinitrd root=ubi0:rootfs ro ubi.mtd=8 earlyprintk rootfstype=ubifs rootwait
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Memory: 233156K/262144K available (6144K kernel code, 241K rwdata, 1612K rodata, 1024K init, 156K bss, 12604K reserved, 16384K cma-reserved, 0K highmem)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Virtual kernel memory layout:
vector : 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 4 kB)
fixmap : 0xffc00000 - 0xfff00000 (3072 kB)
vmalloc : 0xd0800000 - 0xff800000 ( 752 MB)
lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xd0000000 ( 256 MB)
pkmap : 0xbfe00000 - 0xc0000000 ( 2 MB)
modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xbfe00000 ( 14 MB)
.text : 0xc0008000 - 0xc0700000 (7136 kB)
.init : 0xc0900000 - 0xc0a00000 (1024 kB)
.data : 0xc0a00000 - 0xc0a3c540 ( 242 kB)
.bss : 0xc0a3c540 - 0xc0a63804 ( 157 kB)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Preemptible hierarchical RCU implementation.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=4 to nr_cpu_ids=2.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Tasks RCU enabled.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RCU: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=16, nr_cpu_ids=2
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NR_IRQS: 16, nr_irqs: 16, preallocated irqs: 16
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: efuse mapped to d0800000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: slcr mapped to d0802000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C: platform modifies aux control register: 0x72360000 -> 0x72760000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C: DT/platform modifies aux control register: 0x72360000 -> 0x72760000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 erratum 769419 enabled
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 enabling early BRESP for Cortex-A9
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 full line of zeros enabled for Cortex-A9
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 ID prefetch enabled, offset 1 lines
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 dynamic clock gating enabled, standby mode enabled
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310 cache controller enabled, 8 ways, 512 kB
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: L2C-310: CACHE_ID 0x410000c8, AUX_CTRL 0x76760001
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: zynq_clock_init: clkc starts at d0802100
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Zynq clock init
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: sched_clock: 64 bits at 333MHz, resolution 3ns, wraps every 4398046511103ns
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: clocksource: arm_global_timer: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x4ce07af025, max_idle_ns: 440795209040 ns
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Switching to timer-based delay loop, resolution 3ns
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: clocksource: ttc_clocksource: mask: 0xffff max_cycles: 0xffff, max_idle_ns: 537538477 ns
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: timer #0 at d080a000, irq=17
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x30
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 666.66 BogoMIPS (lpj=333333)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Setting up static identity map for 0x100000 - 0x100060
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU1: thread -1, cpu 1, socket 0, mpidr 80000001
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: smp: Brought up 1 node, 2 CPUs
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (1333.33 BogoMIPS).
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: devtmpfs: initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant 9 rev 4
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 1911260446275000 ns
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: futex hash table entries: 512 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pinctrl core: initialized pinctrl subsystem
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 16
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: DMA: preallocated 256 KiB pool for atomic coherent allocations
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: cpuidle: using governor menu
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: hw-breakpoint: found 5 (+1 reserved) breakpoint and 1 watchpoint registers.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: hw-breakpoint: maximum watchpoint size is 4 bytes.
oMiner kernel: zynq-ocm f800c000.ocmc: ZYNQ OCM pool: 256 KiB @ 0xd0840000
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: zynq-pinctrl 700.pinctrl: zynq pinctrl initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: e0000000.serial: ttyPS1 at MMIO 0xe0000000 (irq = 26, base_baud = 6249999) is a xuartps
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: e0001000.serial: ttyPS0 at MMIO 0xe0001000 (irq = 27, base_baud = 6249999) is a xuartps
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: console [ttyPS0] enabled
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: vgaarb: loaded
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: SCSI subsystem initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbcore: registered new device driver usb
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: media: Linux media interface: v0.10
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Linux video capture interface: v2.00
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pps_core: LinuxPPS API ver. 1 registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: pps_core: Software ver. 5.3.6 - Copyright 2005-2007 Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>
ered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: FPGA manager framework
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: fpga-region fpga-full: FPGA Region probed
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Initialized.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: clocksource: Switched to clocksource arm_global_timer
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 2
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: TCP established hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: TCP bind hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UDP hash table entries: 256 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UDP-Lite hash table entries: 256 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 1
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RPC: Registered udp transport module.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: PCI: CLS 0 bytes, default 64
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: hw perfevents: no interrupt-affinity property for /pmu@f8891000, guessing.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: hw perfevents: enabled with armv7_cortex_a9 PMU driver, 7 counters available
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: workingset: timestamp_bits=30 max_order=16 bucket_order=0
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: jffs2: version 2.2. (NAND) (SUMMARY) © 2001-2006 Red Hat, Inc.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: io scheduler noop registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: io scheduler deadline registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: io scheduler cfq registered (default)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: io scheduler mq-deadline registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: io scheduler kyber registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: dma-pl330 f8003000.dmac: Loaded driver for PL330 DMAC-241330
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: dma-pl330 f8003000.dmac: DBUFF-128x8bytes Num_Chans-8 Num_Peri-4 Num_Events-16
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: brd: module loaded
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: loop: module loaded
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: libphy: Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: CAN device driver interface
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: libphy: MACB_mii_bus: probed
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: macb e000b000.ethernet eth0: Cadence GEM rev 0x00020118 at 0xe000b000 irq 29 (a0:b0:45:02:b5:fb)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: RTL8211E Gigabit Ethernet e000b000.ethernet-ffffffff:00: attached PHY driver [RTL8211E Gigabit Ethernet] (mii_bus:phy_addr=e000b000.ethernet-ffffffff:00, irq=POLL)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 3.2.6-k
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: i2c /dev entries driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: cdns-i2c e0004000.i2c: 100 kHz mmio e0004000 irq 23
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR NEC protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR RC5(x/sz) protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR RC6 protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR JVC protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR Sony protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR SANYO protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR Sharp protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR MCE Keyboard/mouse protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: IR XMP protocol handler initialized
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: cdns-wdt f8005000.watchdog: Xilinx Watchdog Timer at d0946000 with timeout 10s
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: EDAC MC: ECC not enabled
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Xilinx Zynq CpuIdle Driver started
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: sdhci-pltfm: SDHCI platform and OF driver helper
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: mmc0: SDHCI controller on e0100000.sdhci [e0100000.sdhci] using ADMA
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ledtrig-cpu: registered to indicate activity on CPUs
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: usbhid: USB HID core driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: nand: WARNING: pl35x-nand: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to the one required by the NAND chip
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 11 ofpart partitions found on MTD device pl35x-nand
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Creating 11 MTD partitions on "pl35x-nand":
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000000000-0x000000400000 : "bootloader"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000400000-0x000000480000 : "env"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000480000-0x000000500000 : "dtb-main"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000500000-0x000000580000 : "dtb-alt"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000580000-0x000000980000 : "fpga-main"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000980000-0x000000d80000 : "fpga-alt"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000000d80000-0x000001280000 : "kernel-main"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000001280000-0x000001780000 : "kernel-alt"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x000001780000-0x0000074c0000 : "rootfs-main"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x0000074c0000-0x00000d200000 : "rootfs-alt"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: 0x00000d200000-0x00000dc00000 : "config"
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: fpga_manager fpga0: Xilinx Zynq FPGA Manager registered
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 10
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Segment Routing with IPv6
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: sit: IPv6, IPv4 and MPLS over IPv4 tunneling driver
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 17
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: can: controller area network core (rev 20170425 abi 9)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 29
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: can: raw protocol (rev 20170425)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: can: broadcast manager protocol (rev 20170425 t)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: can: netlink gateway (rev 20170425) max_hops=1
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: attaching mtd8
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: scanning is finished
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: attached mtd8 (name "rootfs-main", size 93 MiB)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: PEB size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB), LEB size: 126976 bytes
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048/2048, sub-page size 2048
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: VID header offset: 2048 (aligned 2048), data offset: 4096
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: good PEBs: 746, bad PEBs: 0, corrupted PEBs: 0
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: user volume: 1, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 128
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: max/mean erase counter: 1/0, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 1752358700
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: available PEBs: 0, total reserved PEBs: 746, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 40
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ubi0: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 729
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: hctosys: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: of_cfs_init
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: of_cfs_init: OK
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: ALSA device list:
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: No soundcards found.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UBIFS (ubi0:0): UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 0, name "rootfs", R/O mode
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UBIFS (ubi0:0): LEB size: 126976 bytes (124 KiB), min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048 bytes/2048 bytes
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UBIFS (ubi0:0): FS size: 87740416 bytes (83 MiB, 691 LEBs), journal size 9023488 bytes (8 MiB, 72 LEBs)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UBIFS (ubi0:0): reserved for root: 0 bytes (0 KiB)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: UBIFS (ubi0:0): media format: w4/r0 (latest is w5/r0), UUID 5A1BAB54-0036-4152-B314-61D156E3B135, small LPT model
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: VFS: Mounted root (ubifs filesystem) readonly on device 0:12.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: devtmpfs: mounted
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 1024K
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: System time before build time, advancing clock.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: systemd 237 running in system mode. (-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -IMA -APPARMOR -SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP -LIBCRYPTSETUP -GCRYPT -GNUTLS -ACL -XZ +LZ4 -SECCOMP +BLKID -ELFUTILS +KMOD -IDN2 -IDN -PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Detected architecture arm.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Set hostname to <InnoMiner>.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Initializing machine ID from random generator.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Installed transient /etc/machine-id file.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: File /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:35 configures an IP firewall (IPAddressDeny=any), but the local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Proceeding WITHOUT firewalling in effect! (This warning is only shown for the first loaded unit using IP firewalling.)
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Created slice System Slice.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Listening on udev Kernel Socket.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Listening on /dev/initctl Compatibility Named Pipe.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-journald[747]: Journal started
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-journald[747]: Runtime journal (/run/log/journal/9163954dcfdc48bd91b3c0124f184884) is 640.0K, max 5.0M, 4.3M free.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-sysctl[740]: Couldn't write '16' to 'kernel/sysrq', ignoring: No such file or directory
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-sysctl[740]: Couldn't write 'fq_codel' to 'net/core/default_qdisc', ignoring: No such file or directory
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Flush Journal to Persistent Storage...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started udev Kernel Device Manager.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started Rebuild Journal Catalog.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started udev Coldplug all Devices.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-journald[747]: Runtime journal (/run/log/journal/9163954dcfdc48bd91b3c0124f184884) is 640.0K, max 5.0M, 4.3M free.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Update is Completed...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started Flush Journal to Persistent Storage.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started Update is Completed.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Create Volatile Files and Directories...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-tmpfiles[1251]: [/etc/tmpfiles.d/var-factory.conf:7] Duplicate line for path "/var/lib/systemd", ignoring.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-tmpfiles[1251]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/var.conf:14] Duplicate line for path "/var/log", ignoring.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-tmpfiles[1251]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/var.conf:21] Duplicate line for path "/var/lib", ignoring.
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd-networkd[1249]: Enumeration completed
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Found device /dev/ttyPS0.
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-udevd[980]: link_config: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-networkd[1249]: sit0: Link is not managed by us
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-networkd[1249]: lo: Link is not managed by us
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-networkd[1249]: eth0: IPv6 successfully enabled
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-udevd[1257]: link_config: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
Jan 28 15:58:19 InnoMiner systemd-udevd[1253]: link_config: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
Jan 28 15:58:20 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Started Create Volatile Files and Directories.
Jan 28 15:58:20 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Network Name Resolution...
Jan 28 15:58:20 InnoMiner systemd[1]: Starting Network Time Synchronization...

[SeriousOne]

Here more, it hangs usually at connecting to the pools.

https://pastebin.com/22RAKeQW

[MagicSmoker]

We got 3 pieces now, and they worked all well.

But now after transport&network change one won't work anymore, it is looping at "tunning".
Sometime later it just restart also.

Here are some logs:

Code:

...
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: nand: WARNING: pl35x-nand: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to the one required by the NAND chip
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01
Jan 28 15:58:18 InnoMiner kernel: Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01
...

I don't know the first thing about these miners, but these lines stuck out to me. Maybe check the startup logs from your working units to see if they report something similar.

[wKiV7378U]

Here more, it hangs usually at connecting to the pools.

https://pastebin.com/22RAKeQW

any updates on this issue and the ssh login stuff?

purchased one today and am trying to get all my ducks in a row

[SeriousOne]

Here more, it hangs usually at connecting to the pools.

https://pastebin.com/22RAKeQW

any updates on this issue and the ssh login stuff?

purchased one today and am trying to get all my ducks in a row

Yeah, we figured it out, it is some problem with 100fdx duplex.
I got really strange symptoms. It should be caused by the "stupid" switch.
So one friend took the fault device to his place, there it is plugged right away to the modem.
Since then it runs like 100% without nearly 0 rejection.

So if you use a switch you need one where you can switch manually 100fdx duplex.

Or you can try to force it with a twisted cable, this worked, but after i took the router of it didn't helped anymore even when i put the router back.

[cod3gen]

Here more, it hangs usually at connecting to the pools.

https://pastebin.com/22RAKeQW

any updates on this issue and the ssh login stuff?

purchased one today and am trying to get all my ducks in a row

Perhaps you should join Powermining.pw Pool where SeriousOne got all his help... ;-)

Join us on Discord; https://discord.gg/epFf8bF

[SeriousOne]

Yeah the discord chat of powermining.pw brought me most far by now. - https://discord.gg/epFf8bF
Thanks guys!

But it still accrues, the one got "fixed" by taking it out and plug it single in to a modem somewhere else.

Now it seems like a second one got "infected".

So i will watch out for a Switch witch can force 100fdx, is my last hope by now.


EDIT: Ok updating netowork settings kinda helped now for now, by pressing just update.

[2Miners]

2Miners pools support the A9 ZMaster miner. We have SOLO and PPLNS pools for different Equihash coins.
Please use the high share difficulty ports only.

ZEC
SOLO: solo-zec.2miners.com:1111
PPLNS: zec.2miners.com:1111

ZCL
SOLO: solo-zcl.2miners.com:6161
PPLNS: zcl.2miners.com:2121

ZEN
SOLO: solo-zen.2miners.com:7171
PPLNS: zen.2miners.com:3131

HUSH
SOLO: solo-hush.2miners.com:7272
PPLNS: hush.2miners.com:7373

BTCP
SOLO: solo-btcp.2miners.com:1313
PPLNS: btcp.2miners.com:1212

[SlushPool official]

Hello guys, just wanna let you know that we investigated it and the A9 ZMaster works flawlessly on Slush Pool.

Check out the Getting started guide for Zcash if you want to join our pool. Please contact our support team in case you encounter any issue.

[boo50]

Welcome to NIBIRUPOOL
we've a lot of equihash coins for your asics

BCI -->   bci.nibirupool.com:9449
ZEN -->   zen.nibirupool.com:4444
ZCL -->   zcl.nibirupool.com:9059
VIS -->   vis.nibirupool.com:9939
ACH -->   ach.nibirupool.com:9999
VOT -->   vot.nibirupool.com:9019
BTCP -->   btcp.nibirupool.com:9229
ZEL -->   zel.nibirupool.com:9999

High performance stratums on a reliable dedicated servers with solid network connection and great DDOS protection.

[Inno_ASIC]

The world most profitable Zcash miner-Innosilicon A9 ZECMaster is open for order now. Limited stock. First come first served!

Buy now from http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

[Inno_ASIC]

Very nice miner, I have  Roiordered one, I hope to have a fast ROI, for order another one... obky one quesition, it is overcloccable?? There is an official guide? Thanks

Dear customer, thank you for your feedback. Any problem for technical problem you can send email or add Skype miner_support@innosilicon.com.cn We will try our best to help you asap. Thank you.

[Bighero76]

anyone ever purchase the miner of alibaba? wondering why it shows slightly lower there than thru innocilicon??? fakes??

[Inno_ASIC]

Mining low cost bitcoins with certainty! One of our credible mining farm partners with low electricity cost is now looking for  sizable investment to co-invest in mining using Inno T2T/T3 miners to form a winning combination. The plan will ensure profitability with ROI protection. Feel free to contact us via email (miner_a5@innosilicon.com.cn) if interested.

[vincl]

@Inno_ASIC
when do you lower the price of A9 since bitmain dramatically reduced price of Z9?

[Inno_ASIC]

@Inno_ASIC
when do you lower the price of A9 since bitmain dramatically reduced price of Z9?

Dear customer,

Thank you for your interest in Innosilicon.

About A9, you can focus on our website: http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

Thank you.

[vincl]

@Inno_ASIC
when do you lower the price of A9 since bitmain dramatically reduced price of Z9?

Dear customer,

Thank you for your interest in Innosilicon.

About A9, you can focus on our website: http://www.innosilicon.com/html/a9-miner/index.html

Thank you.

this was not the answer i expected. did you even read my message?