[Spammer Blacklist] The Shitlist

[Satofan44]

I keep losing this thread and I found it interesting when I first encountered it in the trust ratings of some users. I believe it would be worthwhile to revive a project like this even if OP is absent. Some senior members could coordinate with the main campaign managers and a new list will be updated.

As long as most managers adhere to the list, it would be very effective. Without the support of managers it is pretty useless though. If managers ignore such neutral feedback or even negative feedback, and DT members won't hold the managers to any kind of serious standards then it is futile.

[yahoo62278]

I keep losing this thread and I found it interesting when I first encountered it in the trust ratings of some users. I believe it would be worthwhile to revive a project like this even if OP is absent. Some senior members could coordinate with the main campaign managers and a new list will be updated.

As long as most managers adhere to the list, it would be very effective. Without the support of managers it is pretty useless though. If managers ignore such neutral feedback or even negative feedback, and DT members won't hold the managers to any kind of serious standards then it is futile.

If users have a tag from Actmyname for spammer list I have refrained from hiring them for the most part. Every now and then a user does show some serious improvement but it's very rare.

You have to keep in mind though that there are alot of managers lately and most of them care about their pockets, not the forum.

[Satofan44]

I keep losing this thread and I found it interesting when I first encountered it in the trust ratings of some users. I believe it would be worthwhile to revive a project like this even if OP is absent. Some senior members could coordinate with the main campaign managers and a new list will be updated.

As long as most managers adhere to the list, it would be very effective. Without the support of managers it is pretty useless though. If managers ignore such neutral feedback or even negative feedback, and DT members won't hold the managers to any kind of serious standards then it is futile.

If users have a tag from Actmyname for spammer list I have refrained from hiring them for the most part. Every now and then a user does show some serious improvement but it's very rare.

Nice work. It is very rare to see significant improvements I agree, whether it is from this list or some neutral tag from other DT member. The only reason why I check the trust ratings is usually because they shitpost.

You have to keep in mind though that there are alot of managers lately and most of them care about their pockets, not the forum.

Well I guess there is some benefit in to be had from evaluating which managers would happily support such an initiative and which wouldn't or which would completely ignore it. To me that would indicate that they do just a bit more than managing.   There is absolutely not a single good reason for someone not to want to support such a list as long as it is properly created and curated by some senior members.

[Zoomic]

I keep losing this thread and I found it interesting when I first encountered it in the trust ratings of some users. I believe it would be worthwhile to revive a project like this even if OP is absent. Some senior members could coordinate with the main campaign managers and a new list will be updated.

As long as most managers adhere to the list, it would be very effective. Without the support of managers it is pretty useless though. If managers ignore such neutral feedback or even negative feedback, and DT members won't hold the managers to any kind of serious standards then it is futile.

If users have a tag from Actmyname for spammer list I have refrained from hiring them for the most part. Every now and then a user does show some serious improvement but it's very rare.

You have to keep in mind though that there are alot of managers lately and most of them care about their pockets, not the forum.

When I was new in the forum, newbies feared actmyname's spammers neutral tag because it was as powerful as a red tag.
Infact, some managers stated it on their campaign rules, that you shouldn't apply if you have a neutral tag from actmyname.
What has changed? Have managers started accepting them?

If there's an honest improvement or repentance from the spammers end, they indeed deserve a second chance. But how will it happen?

[SatoPrincess]

When I was new in the forum, newbies feared actmyname's spammers neutral tag because it was as powerful as a red tag.
Infact, some managers stated it on their campaign rules, that you shouldn't apply if you have a neutral tag from actmyname.
What has changed? Have managers started accepting them?

If there's an honest improvement or repentance from the spammers end, they indeed deserve a second chance. But how will it happen?

You can go to the services board and you will see what’s changed. I don’t blame the managers though because there is an increasing number of available slots on campaigns and it seems there isn’t enough quality posters to meet the increasing demand. I can’t count how many alts have been caught cheating signature campaign this past month.

[mark89012]

You can go to the services board and you will see what’s changed. I don’t blame the managers though because there is an increasing number of available slots on campaigns and it seems there isn’t enough quality posters to meet the increasing demand. I can’t count how many alts have been caught cheating signature campaign this past month.

That’s one reason, but the main thing is some of the users listed there probably improved their posting already. That tag is more than 5 years old if I’m not mistaken, and the DT who tagged them isn’t even active anymore, last login was over a year ago. So there’s no update on the tag at all.

[SuperBitMan]

You can go to the services board and you will see what’s changed. I don’t blame the managers though because there is an increasing number of available slots on campaigns and it seems there isn’t enough quality posters to meet the increasing demand. I can’t count how many alts have been caught cheating signature campaign this past month.

That’s one reason, but the main thing is some of the users listed there probably improved their posting already. That tag is more than 5 years old if I’m not mistaken, and the DT who tagged them isn’t even active anymore, last login was over a year ago. So there’s no update on the tag at all.

Yeah I think so too, some of the users has improved in their writing, I know some people in this forum when they started they were so poor in writing however, now they have improved greatly and that is how things work a lot of time in this forum because here is a learning ground, some people that are now very good in writing now were never good at the beginning, so if anyone had improved in his or her writing skills I think such a person should be given a chance.
I think if the OP was active he would have removed some negative feedback from some set of users because of their improvement.

[nutildah]

I think if the OP was active he would have removed some negative feedback from some set of users because of their improvement.

actmyname didn't leave negative feedback for shitposting, he left neutral feedback for that. It just stings as much as a negative because many people still find his trust to be meaningful. It was actually a selfless deed of good he did by leaving those couple hundred neutrals as its encouraged who knows how many thousand more accounts to try to be better posters.

I find most shitposters don't improve with time because they run multiple accounts and are in a hurry to crank out as many posts as possible. This is how it becomes possible to have thousands of posts with little corresponding merit.

OP hasn't been active for quite some time. If one of your accounts was impacted by his feedback, you can always make a case for why it should be ignored because you've improved.