holy_ship
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 1
|
|
September 17, 2018, 04:52:06 AM |
|
I have try with my 1060 This result give the same speed of Vanitigen, but it not support multi GPU at now.
Default settings are not optimal. Play with -p -b -t settings And it doesn't check uncompressed until you say so. For gtx1070 I got 80MK instead of 40MK with vanitygen. But I dig for collisions also, not only 32BTC bounty. While searching for 32BTC bounty alone I get about 240MK on gtx1070 and that's impressive!
|
|
|
|
nc50lc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 6217
Self-proclaimed Genius
|
|
September 17, 2018, 05:29:51 AM |
|
Have a multi GPU version running 170mKeys/s on RX570 or 150mKeys/s on GTX 1060, a rig with 6 runs just above a billion/sec.
Your speed is double compare with mine.1060 3G win 7, 16G ram, core i5 ivy. He's using his own fork/version. Question is: if it is free, open-source or real, he didn't shared the link. -snip-
Is this the version that keychainX is talking about: Faster and Autonomous Large Bitcoin Collider upgrade? 'Coz I'm seeing the same users from that thread.
|
|
|
|
keychainX
Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 53
Telegram @keychainX
|
|
September 17, 2018, 07:34:06 AM |
|
Have a multi GPU version running 170mKeys/s on RX570 or 150mKeys/s on GTX 1060, a rig with 6 runs just above a billion/sec.
Your speed is double compare with mine.1060 3G win 7, 16G ram, core i5 ivy. [/quote] He's using his own fork/version. Question is: if it is free, open-source or real, he didn't shared the link. -snip-
Is this the version that keychainX is talking about: Faster and Autonomous Large Bitcoin Collider upgrade? 'Coz I'm seeing the same users from that thread. [/quote] No, I have a custom made version, you need to optimize the OpenCL drivers in order to get into that speed.
|
|
|
|
vel12
|
|
September 20, 2018, 09:20:53 AM Last edit: September 21, 2018, 03:27:43 AM by vel12 |
|
waiting version for AMD
|
|
|
|
DevilOper
Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 26
|
|
October 03, 2018, 10:26:55 AM |
|
you need to optimize the OpenCL drivers in order to get into that speed. What do you mean by 'optimize the OpenCL drivers'? What drivers? (Once upon a time I found the SDK 3.0 is an insane registry eater while previous version, don't remember exactly was it 2.9 or 3.0beta, was faster but buggy.)
|
|
|
|
successhalf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2018, 12:57:53 PM |
|
help me put a command input address.txt output result.txt
BitCrack64.exe input address output result.txt
|
|
|
|
|
successhalf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 06, 2018, 01:35:27 PM |
|
does not work with that command BitCrack64.exe -i address.txt -o result.txt help type command here
|
|
|
|
The Healer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2018, 02:45:16 PM |
|
I would like to add more than one BTC address as TARGET. How do I do that? I know it's one address per line, but in the same BAT file we use to run BitCrack64.exe -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 ? Or in another txt file? Thank you for any help
|
|
|
|
ianek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2018, 04:01:55 PM |
|
I would like to add more than one BTC address as TARGET. How do I do that? I know it's one address per line, but in the same BAT file we use to run BitCrack64.exe -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 ? Or in another txt file? Thank you for any help bitcrack64 -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 -c -i addr.txt -o out.txt -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 -r 100000000000
|
|
|
|
The Healer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2018, 04:59:10 PM |
|
Thank you for the answer. 1. I have to run the .bat file with something like this: bitcrack64 -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 -c -i addr.txt -o out.txt -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 -r 100000000000 2. But I need 1 file with this name "addr.txt" and another with "out.txt" in the same folder, right? 3. In the file "addr.txt" I need BTC addresses (1 per line), correct? 4. what do I need in the "out.txt" file?
|
|
|
|
ianek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2018, 10:39:01 PM |
|
Thank you for the answer. 1. I have to run the .bat file with something like this: bitcrack64 -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 -c -i addr.txt -o out.txt -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 -r 100000000000 2. But I need 1 file with this name "addr.txt" and another with "out.txt" in the same folder, right? 3. In the file "addr.txt" I need BTC addresses (1 per line), correct? 4. what do I need in the "out.txt" file? 1. Yes, create .bat with this line 1.1. switch -s address from which to start checking; switch -r is the number of addresses to check starting from the -s parameter. 2. In the addr.txt file you insert the addresses you want to find, and the program will create the out.txt file when it finds a match. 3. Yes. 4. The out.txt file will be created by the program when a match is found.
|
|
|
|
The Healer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2018, 10:56:45 AM Last edit: October 12, 2018, 01:04:34 PM by The Healer |
|
Again, thank you for your help. I can do it with 1 address like this: BitCrack.exe -s 6BBF8CCF80F8E184D1D300EF2CE45F7260E56766519C977831678F0000000000 1FshYsUh3mqgsG29XpZ23eLjWV8Ur3VwH But I can't make it work with several addresses in the txt file. When I run the bat file: bitcrack64 -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 -c -i addr.txt -o out.txt -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 -r 100000000000 it opens and almost instantly closes. I barely can see what does it say. But I recorded the screen, and it gives an error: invalid address , because it assumes the target as "-i" and not the address it self on each line. What do I need to change? Looks like some syntax mistake.
|
|
|
|
ianek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2018, 01:53:18 PM Last edit: October 13, 2018, 05:50:12 AM by ianek |
|
Again, thank you for your help. I can do it with 1 address like this: BitCrack.exe -s 6BBF8CCF80F8E184D1D300EF2CE45F7260E56766519C977831678F0000000000 1FshYsUh3mqgsG29XpZ23eLjWV8Ur3VwH But I can't make it work with several addresses in the txt file. When I run the bat file: bitcrack64 -b 32 -t 256 -p 16 -c -i addr.txt -o out.txt -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 -r 100000000000 it opens and almost instantly closes. I barely can see what does it say. But I recorded the screen, and it gives an error: invalid address , because it assumes the target as "-i" and not the address it self on each line. What do I need to change? Looks like some syntax mistake. What version of bitcrack do you have? Try to make a list of addresses in the program 'notepad'. For each line at the address without spaces, periods, commas, etc. There was also a problem with reading the address list, the re-creation in the 'notepad' helped.
|
|
|
|
|
by rallier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1334
just in case
|
|
October 15, 2018, 09:24:01 AM |
|
another crack tool. Keep up work. Bitcoin will be more safe with the hack
|
signature not found.
|
|
|
milewilda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3262
Merit: 1155
|
|
October 15, 2018, 09:06:19 PM |
|
another crack tool. Keep up work. Bitcoin will be more safe with the hack Im surprised that these kind of tools do exist nowadays and been actively lurking on here.Just wondering on how many they had bruteforced already?
|
|
|
|
almightyruler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
|
another crack tool. Keep up work. Bitcoin will be more safe with the hack Im surprised that these kind of tools do exist nowadays and been actively lurking on here.Just wondering on how many they had bruteforced already? People have probably been trying to crack keys from day 1. It's impractical to cover the entire search space - that's why crypto works - but if you have some (very) strong hints, it is possible to brute force only a small range and find some hits. As an example, there are several private keys used in the blockchain, hidden in plain sight, sitting at the very bottom of the private key range. The puzzle transactions referred to earlier in this thread also have private keys over a very limited (and known) range, so the chances of cracking them are much better. For a key that's generated truly randomly the chances of discovering it via brute force are essentially zero. You'd probably be better off trying to mine a new Bitcoin block.
|
|
|
|
arulbero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1917
Merit: 2074
|
|
October 20, 2018, 04:29:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
fucilator_3000
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 27
|
|
October 20, 2018, 04:32:32 PM |
|
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|