Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:00:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96]
  Print  
Author Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys  (Read 74401 times)
NotATether
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1582
Merit: 6688


bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2024, 06:24:59 AM
 #1901

I remember I saw somewhere the benchmark table with the speeds for BitCrack with different nvidia cards (2080,3080,4080, .... ti versions, Tesla, etc). Can you please share it or write the current benchmarks (actual in 2024 with the most common hardware).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4453897.msg55552855#msg55552855

Unrelated, but I am just wondering have you ever found any keys from all those sub-ranges you were searching in for on Bitcrack for a long time, or did you not find anything?

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
1714201211
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714201211

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714201211
Reply with quote  #2

1714201211
Report to moderator
1714201211
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714201211

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714201211
Reply with quote  #2

1714201211
Report to moderator
1714201211
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714201211

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714201211
Reply with quote  #2

1714201211
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714201211
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714201211

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714201211
Reply with quote  #2

1714201211
Report to moderator
unamic
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 03, 2024, 01:35:31 PM
Last edit: February 03, 2024, 02:01:25 PM by unamic
 #1902

What is the best Settings for an RTX 3090?
I have this for now -b 128 -t 256 -p 1024 but is this the best setting?
qq569160818
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 05, 2024, 12:28:20 PM
 #1903

Can try different combinations multiple times, personal recommendation  256   512   1024  or   512    1024    2048?
rexxx97
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 06, 2024, 08:22:44 PM
 #1904

Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
raschwarz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 29, 2024, 01:19:18 PM
Last edit: February 29, 2024, 02:13:55 PM by raschwarz
 #1905

Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?

hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now

My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
SoftwaretbpresultWatts
cuBitCrack256256512~2975 MKey/s466
cuBitCrack2562561024~3040 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285121024~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack2562562048~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285122048~3165 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack1282564096~3130 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack2561284096~3090 MKey/s464

I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or  "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".

WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...


View Profile
February 29, 2024, 04:54:38 PM
 #1906

Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?

hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now

My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
SoftwaretbpresultWatts
cuBitCrack256256512~2975 MKey/s466
cuBitCrack2562561024~3040 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285121024~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack2562562048~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285122048~3165 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack1282564096~3130 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack2561284096~3090 MKey/s464

I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or  "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".



I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.

A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.

You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
raschwarz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 29, 2024, 07:59:52 PM
 #1907

Hello,
there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?

hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now

My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI)
SoftwaretbpresultWatts
cuBitCrack256256512~2975 MKey/s466
cuBitCrack2562561024~3040 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285121024~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack2562562048~3080 MKey/s467
cuBitCrack1285122048~3165 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack1282564096~3130 MKey/s464
cuBitCrack2561284096~3090 MKey/s464

I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or  "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".



I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.

A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.

You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.


Thanks for reply, you are right. I am not using it anymore, just made test before and want to share some results.
I went to kangaroos/bsgs where is so much space for improvements and max 4090 utilization :-)
Olek5k
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 10, 2024, 07:15:50 PM
 #1908

Hello, I also want to join the key finder (1000 BTC Bitcoin Challenge Transaction) but I don't know how to install BitCrack program (I have one rtx 2060 video card I want to try it), is it possible to have a detailed description or a video how to install this BitCrack program step by step and set it up correctly, I would like to try the selective method.
coolindark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 959
Merit: 1037



View Profile WWW
March 31, 2024, 12:05:35 AM
 #1909

Question:

Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:

00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000

ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
iceland2k14
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 52


View Profile
March 31, 2024, 04:29:33 AM
 #1910

Question:

Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:

00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option
coolindark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 959
Merit: 1037



View Profile WWW
March 31, 2024, 01:35:48 PM
 #1911

Question:

Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:

00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option

Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.

ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
iceland2k14
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 52


View Profile
March 31, 2024, 03:40:41 PM
 #1912

Question:

Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:

00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option

Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.

Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be....

start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000
end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000
stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000

I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride.
otterosch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2024, 07:28:59 PM
 #1913

I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.

A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.

You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.

Thank you, I wish I had known earlier Smiley
coolindark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 959
Merit: 1037



View Profile WWW
April 14, 2024, 08:42:15 AM
 #1914

Question:

Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:

00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option

Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.

Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be....

start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000
end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000
stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000

I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride.

Thank you  Smiley

ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!