NotATether
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1582
Merit: 6688
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
January 25, 2024, 06:24:59 AM |
|
Unrelated, but I am just wondering have you ever found any keys from all those sub-ranges you were searching in for on Bitcrack for a long time, or did you not find anything?
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
unamic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 2
|
|
February 03, 2024, 01:35:31 PM Last edit: February 03, 2024, 02:01:25 PM by unamic |
|
What is the best Settings for an RTX 3090? I have this for now -b 128 -t 256 -p 1024 but is this the best setting?
|
|
|
|
qq569160818
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 05, 2024, 12:28:20 PM |
|
Can try different combinations multiple times, personal recommendation 256 512 1024 or 512 1024 2048?
|
|
|
|
rexxx97
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2024, 08:22:44 PM |
|
Hello, there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
|
|
|
|
raschwarz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 29, 2024, 01:19:18 PM Last edit: February 29, 2024, 02:13:55 PM by raschwarz |
|
Hello, there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI) Software | t | b | p | result | Watts | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch".
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
February 29, 2024, 04:54:38 PM |
|
Hello, there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI) Software | t | b | p | result | Watts | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch". I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever. A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s. You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
|
|
|
|
raschwarz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 29, 2024, 07:59:52 PM |
|
Hello, there is a benchmark database of nvidia rtx 30s and 40s?
hi, I am also looking for such table, but no luck till now My results with Ubuntu 22.04, nVidia 545.x.x drivers and CUDA v12.3 on i5 CPU, 96 GB DDR5 RAM, single RTX 4090 (water cooled, from MSI) Software | t | b | p | result | Watts | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 512 | ~2975 MKey/s | 466 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 1024 | ~3040 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 1024 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 256 | 2048 | ~3080 MKey/s | 467 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 512 | 2048 | ~3165 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 128 | 256 | 4096 | ~3130 MKey/s | 464 | cuBitCrack | 256 | 128 | 4096 | ~3090 MKey/s | 464 |
I don't know if it can be better. I played with param values longer time, but many time I was stopped by "[Info] Error: out of memory" or "[Info] Error: too many resources requested for launch". I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever. A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s. You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO. Thanks for reply, you are right. I am not using it anymore, just made test before and want to share some results. I went to kangaroos/bsgs where is so much space for improvements and max 4090 utilization :-)
|
|
|
|
Olek5k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2024, 07:15:50 PM |
|
Hello, I also want to join the key finder (1000 BTC Bitcoin Challenge Transaction) but I don't know how to install BitCrack program (I have one rtx 2060 video card I want to try it), is it possible to have a detailed description or a video how to install this BitCrack program step by step and set it up correctly, I would like to try the selective method.
|
|
|
|
coolindark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 959
Merit: 1037
|
|
March 31, 2024, 12:05:35 AM |
|
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
|
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
|
|
|
iceland2k14
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 52
|
|
March 31, 2024, 04:29:33 AM |
|
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option
|
|
|
|
coolindark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 959
Merit: 1037
|
|
March 31, 2024, 01:35:48 PM |
|
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me.
|
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
|
|
|
iceland2k14
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 52
|
|
March 31, 2024, 03:40:41 PM |
|
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me. Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be.... start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000 end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000 stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000 I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride.
|
|
|
|
otterosch
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2024, 07:28:59 PM |
|
I would suggest to stop using bitcrack until it is updated, if ever.
A 4090 using the vanitysearch with bitcrack option, gets 5000 MKey/s, and using KeyHuntCuda, a 4090 gets over 6000 MKey/s.
You are wasting MKey/s by still trying to use bitcrack, IMO.
Thank you, I wish I had known earlier
|
|
|
|
coolindark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 959
Merit: 1037
|
|
April 14, 2024, 08:42:15 AM |
|
Question:
Is it possible to make search specific spaces in the priv-key? Like shown below in X:
00000000000000000000000000000XXXXXXXX000000000000000000000000000
Yes this is done by using -stride option Yes, i got it but could not figure out how can i correctly mark the start-end points. Can you give me the stride setting for this example? This will help me. Your sample is 64 length so i assumed it is hex privatekey format. On this basis the start, end and stride for the key search will be.... start = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000 end = 0xFFFFFFFF000000000000000000000000000 stride = 0x1000000000000000000000000000 I think you will modify it accordingly to fill your 0 values in start and end..but no need to change anything in stride. Thank you
|
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ ʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔʕ•̫͡•ʕ*̫͡*ʕ•͓͡•ʔ-̫͡-ʕ•̫͡•ʔ*̫͡*ʔ-̫͡-ʔ
|
|
|
|