how do you choose ICO ?

[poli.isk]

There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?

[Maestro75]

All that you listed is still what almost everybody posting here will tell you. Kind of you knew the answers already. Let me add, buying into ICO is like crossing the rail tracks with eyes closed. It is a very big risk. Even those with great team and white paper still end up fraudulent.

[Grim149x]

I kind of go into IcoBench and check the hot ICOs then go on a deeper research about those. There's a lot to check but it's better if you make your own judgement based on the information you gathered so you can do better over time.

[Pecinan]

first I see the rate iconya, whitepaper, website and also threadnya
and the most important thing is to know the team of the ico project

[payjoe93]

I suggest you to review ICO first. You can check ICO on reviewing site. On Icobench my first see is activity of ICO on Bitcointlk, social media, etc. Check telegram channel to. more member on telegram, is more chance success. Why activity is important ( in my opinion ), its because ICO is need investor to reach success for his project. So, more activity is more chance to get investor. Investing.com is good option to review ICO. On investing.com is not crypto only and have a big investing community . So, if ICO is listing on investing.com, i think that ICO have a chance to success.

Good Luck.

*Sorry my Bad English

[Anton1105]

You can never 100% avoid risks in investing. Scammers have always been and will be especially in the ICOs, because at the moment there is no full-fledged regulatory legislation.

[TobiasVR]

There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?

I always see how the development of ico for some time so we not only see from the team and the concept alone but also from the initial sales development set. if the initial sale is very good can be used as an option to follow and believed will be success.

[Trecs]

Everyone should have their own strategy in this regard. I first of all read the white paper and look at the team. After that I draw conclusions, it is necessary to me further to understand the project or not

[divowok]

There are a lot of factors that go into researching a valuable ICO. IMO you should be looking at the goal that they are trying to accomplish, the problem they are trying to solve, the steps they are taking and willing to take to solve the given problem, what kind of funds they're trying to raise for their project.
Example...if a startup project is trying to raise 400 million, you have to ask yourself, why on earth do they need that much money?

Take a look at a couple of projects, I think you'll find them interesting. Fr8 Network and/or Muirfield IP.

Fr8 is trying to remove intermediaries from the supply chain process, bringing revenue back to distributors and carriers.

Muirfield IP is a private equity fund based on the blockchain.

Still, DYOR.

[mummybtc]

It is researc, you need to scan the space for good projects, most people recently only go to ico-listing website and youtube videos which is good but looking at the way the space has changed, you need to get into project early, like private sale and presale

[Lighthouze]

I have a lot sources for ICO's and I choose based on reading the whitepaper, I do not have a lot of technical knowledge, but I try to understand the problem and solution the project is proffering. I check the team and reviews about the project by respected people in the industry.

[reptylia]

There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?

Do not forget about smart contracts and innovative platforms that offer the highest level of confidentiality. A bright representative of this category is the digital platform Wanchain, engaged in the development of smart contracts based on the digital economy, in place of the traditional banking sector.

[Dakshkapoor]

Just take some advices from the experiences players . What are their views and go thourgh the ICO's whitepaper thoroughly so that you
will get good knowledge of that ICO and also take go through the team of that ICO as its whole market is dependent on that team.

[huntingbtc5]

Easy way to choose good bounty is to check the top rating of ICO list in some sites like ICOdrops, ICObench, Coingecko etc. Otherwise you have to analyze the project, keep track on manager, follow social activities, check whitepaper etc.

[Chaki]

Number one I look is the campaign manager itself, since we have friends in here that make the list of good bounty manager then I compare them so sometimes you can across with a names in both post so I go with it since they also tell the style of the manager and its previous work, then I check the project white paper, its roadmap, token supply and distribution.

[BitcoinArsenal]

99% of all ICOs are money-losing businesses. The times are over when you could make easily money out of almost every ICO.
Just do some research and compare the buying price of recent ICOs with the current value and many have less than have the value.

[ryurifai]

there are some things to note if you want to invest in ico,

- Study the ICO’s whitepaper and evaluate the use cases: Before selecting an ICO to invest in, prospective investors should read the whitepaper and evaluate the projects’ feasibility and decide if the platform has present and future real-world use .
- Check the project’s MVP (minimum viable product)
- Study the company’s website and team: The website is a great place to ‘meet’ the team. Reading the bios of the core team can help an investor understand their value; the golden rule here is ‘A good team = good product’.
- Follow the team’s social media profiles: Typically, individuals passionate about a product or project will share their views on their own product, other projects and the industry.
- And Look Out for Project Announcements on Various Forums , ICO companies announce launches on alternate media channels, like cryptocurrency forums and Telegram, in addition to social media. There are several websites that list upcoming ICO’s and rate them.

[ragavancoin]

Before choosing any ico you have to check the ico road map and team of ico project and idea about the ico further plans and there are more ico reviewing site is there you can do some research about ico project in that website.

[berezov_petro]

There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?

You have all described it correctly and nobody is insured from a bad ICO. You need to be very attentive and pay attention to all the details. You need to do a lot of research before investing in a project.

[Cokodi]

I believe that certain factors must be taken into account when choosing a project. First of all, it is the amount of money that is going to be collected and the idea of the project.