[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[Terk]

Thanks, my address is 1FSLz8L6MHFgbQ4b5fWddN2QVtdLU1nBU3 and yeah like you said, the 2nd 2 transactions sho coins being recieved by you but then transfered out without my bitcoin qt wallet noticing? and would the fact that the address was in the "other addresses" collum instead of the "recieve" collum have anything to do with it? I heard that after the addresses change the old ones are still active

As seen here: https://blockchain.info/address/1FSLz8L6MHFgbQ4b5fWddN2QVtdLU1nBU3 you received a payment from the pool and half an hour later this transaction occurred: https://blockchain.info/tx/36cd7a89f41bda976da029eae482a320de72a3001b262fd8a55664c285e25e1f

Are you sure you didn't make any send transactions from your bitcoin wallet? When sending from bitcoin-qt you don't really control from which of your addresses bitcoin-qt sends bitcoins. My guess is that you paid somewhere 0.027 BTC which was funded by mixing together inputs from three of your addresses, including the one you've got your pool payment to.

[Trollope]

Thanks, my address is 1FSLz8L6MHFgbQ4b5fWddN2QVtdLU1nBU3 and yeah like you said, the 2nd 2 transactions sho coins being recieved by you but then transfered out without my bitcoin qt wallet noticing? and would the fact that the address was in the "other addresses" collum instead of the "recieve" collum have anything to do with it? I heard that after the addresses change the old ones are still active

As seen here: https://blockchain.info/address/1FSLz8L6MHFgbQ4b5fWddN2QVtdLU1nBU3 you received a payment from the pool and half an hour later this transaction occurred: https://blockchain.info/tx/36cd7a89f41bda976da029eae482a320de72a3001b262fd8a55664c285e25e1f

Are you sure you didn't make any send transactions from your bitcoin wallet? When sending from bitcoin-qt you don't really control from which of your addresses bitcoin-qt sends bitcoins. My guess is that you paid somewhere 0.027 BTC which was funded by mixing together inputs from three of your addresses, including the one you've got your pool payment to.

I am sure i have made no transactions, because i have only transferred out of my wallet once and that was a few weeks ago. So should i just change the bitcoin address that i get paid to?

[Terk]

I am sure i have made no transactions, because i have only transferred out of my wallet once and that was a few weeks ago. So should i just change the bitcoin address that i get paid to?

If you think your wallet might be compromised then you definitely should change your payout address, but it's best if it would be from a totally different wallet. I think you should also check why anyone might have access to your wallet and maybe seek help in the Technical Support subforum?

[sdhayes12345]

I have been mining for 6 hours with 3 miners, rejected + stales stabilized at about 5%.I think there are some time-frames that this appears to be higher or lower, but the overall reject rate, according to cgremote is that, which I think it is fine...Could be better but it is a good start

I didnt lower intensity because I am using r9 280x at I-13 but I added --scan-time 1 and --expiry 1

I feel that queue-0 helped my reject rate as well, but I didn't test this very long.  I'm happy with scan 1, exp 1, queue 0 and 3 percent rejects. 

[borris123]

I have been mining for 6 hours with 3 miners, rejected + stales stabilized at about 5%.I think there are some time-frames that this appears to be higher or lower, but the overall reject rate, according to cgremote is that, which I think it is fine...Could be better but it is a good start

I didnt lower intensity because I am using r9 280x at I-13 but I added --scan-time 1 and --expiry 1

I feel that queue-0 helped my reject rate as well, but I didn't test this very long.  I'm happy with scan 1, exp 1, queue 0 and 3 percent rejects. 

I got q 4. What does it actually do?

[hardergamer]

Hi i have been testing your pool for the last 5 hours, and im geting very low rejects, less than 2% 
but my ping is at 188ms im in the UK, if you get anuf intrest will you add a EU sever?
i keep testing for 48 hours and if the payouts look on track i add sum more hash.

ps i realy like the website 

[borris123]

Hi i have been testing your pool for the last 5 hours, and im geting very low rejects, less than 2% 
but my ping is at 188ms im in the UK, if you get anuf intrest will you add a EU sever?
i keep testing for 48 hours and if the payouts look on track i add sum more hash.

ps i realy like the website 

What your settings? I getting 4-5% ish aNow and would like it lower than that

[borris123]

Can you make the stats to show what your mining per hour on average on our stats? Think the stats need to be updated more often as well plz

[Terk]

Can you make the stats to show what your mining per hour on average on our stats?

Not sure I understand.

Think the stats need to be updated more often as well plz

This is on my todo list. Stay tuned.

if you get anuf intrest will you add a EU sever?

Definitely. But I need to solve some technical issues first and the pool needs to grow big enough in terms of hashpower.

[borris123]

Can you make the stats to show what your mining per hour on average on our stats?

Not sure I understand.

Think the stats need to be updated more often as well plz

This is on my todo list. Stay tuned.

if you get anuf intrest will you add a EU sever?

Definitely. But I need to solve some technical issues first and the pool needs to grow big enough in terms of hashpower.

To show how many bit coins we are earning per hour. It only showing hash rates ATM and the figures shown are for a day.

[Slow1]

I tried different settings etc, still running about 10% rejects.  Guess I'm just not set up right for this pool... daily value is less than when I was mining Doge alone so I'm going back to that for a while.   I will keep checking and re-try in a bit, perhaps after the reject issue is figured out.  I hate losing 10% of my capacity like this.

If anyone has additional suggestions I'm game, but I can't really take the time to disconnect/reconnect a bunch of times in order to resolve this.

[Suppo]

too much rejects... back to middlecoin

[shango]

Sounds good!
We have about 10mh/s and we would love to move to a place with smaller fees.
However we are in EU so US server will most likely have too many rejects.
So we'd wait for and EU server.
Meanwhile we have opened a thread to our board and will be discussing our tests with CleverMining there : http://cointradertalk.org//index.php/topic,40.0.html

[Rocco1180]

I have been mining for 6 hours with 3 miners, rejected + stales stabilized at about 5%.I think there are some time-frames that this appears to be higher or lower, but the overall reject rate, according to cgremote is that, which I think it is fine...Could be better but it is a good start

I didnt lower intensity because I am using r9 280x at I-13 but I added --scan-time 1 and --expiry 1

I feel that queue-0 helped my reject rate as well, but I didn't test this very long.  I'm happy with scan 1, exp 1, queue 0 and 3 percent rejects. 

I tryed scan 1, exp 1 and queue 0 with a rig of 5xr9 290 and had a lot more rejects... round about 17%

Going back to 60, 120 and 1

[sgsdebruijn]

I have been mining for 6 hours with 3 miners, rejected + stales stabilized at about 5%.I think there are some time-frames that this appears to be higher or lower, but the overall reject rate, according to cgremote is that, which I think it is fine...Could be better but it is a good start

I didnt lower intensity because I am using r9 280x at I-13 but I added --scan-time 1 and --expiry 1

I feel that queue-0 helped my reject rate as well, but I didn't test this very long.  I'm happy with scan 1, exp 1, queue 0 and 3 percent rejects. 

I tryed scan 1, exp 1 and queue 0 with a rig of 5xr9 290 and had a lot more rejects... round about 17%
Going back to 60, 120 and 1

With the above settings the stales come in

[Rocco1180]

I have been mining for 6 hours with 3 miners, rejected + stales stabilized at about 5%.I think there are some time-frames that this appears to be higher or lower, but the overall reject rate, according to cgremote is that, which I think it is fine...Could be better but it is a good start

I didnt lower intensity because I am using r9 280x at I-13 but I added --scan-time 1 and --expiry 1

I feel that queue-0 helped my reject rate as well, but I didn't test this very long.  I'm happy with scan 1, exp 1, queue 0 and 3 percent rejects. 

I tryed scan 1, exp 1 and queue 0 with a rig of 5xr9 290 and had a lot more rejects... round about 17%
Going back to 60, 120 and 1

With the above settings the stales come in

where are you from? I'm from Germany and for the time I'm not satisfied with the rejects. http://www.clevermining.com/users/115k6SCfEeYEbWQkdcMCTmqddiZ1dPZKTp

14,4% 

3% sounds like a dream.

Will mining at Clevermining over the weekend and hope they can fix the problem. Maybe Fee's can be lowered until the problem is fixed.

[borris123]

Rejects gone up to 8 again :/ can't think of anything else to try my side to lower them. If I lower intensity anymore it will drop hash to much and won't be worth it.

[erre]

Disconnecting again..

[borris123]

I noticed while watching the mining some of the rejects are duplicate shares. What does this mean?

[sgsdebruijn]

I am from near Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

Cgwatcher reports 2.26% rejects 0,21% stale
Cgminer 186362 accepted and 3380 rejected

"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "5",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",