So what is the benefit of it in their part? They can't control the market even they proclaim they are the one who created this art,
I believe what is the reason why they decided to publish that they are the one behind Satoshi? or they are trying to fish the real persons/s behind it?
Wants to charge 2% royalties for transactions over $800
He is asking for "voluntary" royalties.
Because I suspect that as soon as he demands money they can potentially charge him with fraud.
The creative commons would override his copyright registration if he tried to enforce it.
Trademarking Bitcoin Cash would effectively not affect Bitcoin but would affect Bitcoin Cash or Bcash as some people prefer to call it.
I own all the private keys, blockchains, alt coins and bitcoins under copyright law.
To obtain a FREE user license and an updated copy of this notice please contact Ronald Keala Kua Maria only at my contact information below or with the Guestbook and Feedback page on this website.
Basic Income plan all users may be required to pay 2% royalties on transactions over $800 USD and or any and all transactions after eight daily transactions to provide $800 a month Basic Income to all users subject to Copyright law and this Basic Income Plan. Licensees may register their keys in a privatekeybank.com and or publickeybank.com account. Non-Licensees may be subject to a ledgerblockout.com account until royalties are paid.
All royalties will be paid into an annuity ainnuity.com which will invest in participating businesses and payout a monthly annuity payment to all qualified users.
IMPORTANT: ALL USERS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PLACE A LINK OF THIS NOTICE ON ALL RELATED WEBSITES AND TRANSACTIONS USING MY COPYRIGHTED TECHNOLOGY.
LEGAL NOTICE: THIS ENTIRE PROGRAM AND FREE LICENSE IS 100% VOLUNTARY. PARTICIPANTS WILL BE PUBLICLY VERIFIABLE AT VOLANTIR.COM TO SIGNAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TRANSACTIONS WITH NON-PARTICIPANTS NOT CONTRIBUTING TO THIS BASIC INCOME PLAN.
Ronald also lays claims on:
text, computer program, artwork
The real Satoshi would know that someone else designed the artwork and that the code was a collaborative effort with other developers.
Ronald claims:
I did not publish any part of my TXu002037698 work prior to 08/17/2016.
On or about 09/20/2005 my home (address below) was raided by Federal and State authorities joint task force and my computers, laptops, files, inventions, copyrights, etc. were seized.
The real Satoshi did publish it all before 2016 and a raid in 2005 wouldn't affect his ability to prove it.
In October 2008, Satoshi published a paper on the cryptography mailing list at metzdowd.com describing the bitcoin digital currency.
Satoshi released the Version 0.1 of bitcoin software on Sourceforge on 9 January 2009. Even prior to the release there were others involved in the development of the code. After the release the code was also maintained by others based on it being open source.
If it were a credible claim (which it is not) then Ronald defrauded everyone who worked on it for free.
In my opinion his claims are so blatantly false and so unlike Satoshi. He is denigrating and maligning the character of Satoshi.
Qualities that I believe describes the real Satoshi would be: Calm, honest, humble, intelligent, dedicated, private and altruistic.
Also Satoshi registered his birthdate as: April 5, 1975
LOL @
intactico@gmail.com as I doubt Satoshi would ever use gmail.
