Long story short, I joined Konios Signature bounty just because most of the campaigns don't allow negative trust whereas Konios did. I earned my stakes and now they rejected me for no reason but their newly made up rule?
Says "Good" even after seeing my negative trust on my profile:
https://prnt.sc/k320upRequests my BTC adress and then rejects me
http://archive.is/wUkQL#selection-1423.0-1408.4New rule makes up during the campaign(?) and my reaction afterwards
https://prnt.sc/k32apr >
https://prnt.sc/k321a3I was tagged long before the campaign, they should have been aware of that
https://prnt.sc/k321oySays "do whatever you want to" even though I am right on scam accusation -- which shows high levels of unprofessionalism
https://prnt.sc/k321y0I am rejected despite those 100 stakes
https://prnt.sc/k3225qProof that there is no rule regarding negative trust
http://archive.is/dFsjc#selection-703.0-713.58I love how he says "I will not accept you in any campaign
" like I am interested in fucking scammers bounties now
http://prntscr.com/k390fpThis faggot (saif) tells me to read the rules and blocks me after
https://prnt.sc/k38yl0Sheet (in case they remove my stakes)
https://prnt.sc/k31rolhttp://archive.is/maZFt As it is clear, no mistake made from my side in this process, I have followed the specified rules and I have earned it. And as I said in the chat with Wapinter, even if they had forgotten to add the rule, it was their responsibility to check the accounts and notify participants about the situation. Haven't they ever checked my profile for the signature and avatar for the time being? I don't think so.
The lesson that needs to be derived from this case is, briefly: You should not participate in a campaign which does not consist of professionals, nor does its job properly, and is managed by Wapinter Scamming Bounty Management.Accounts involved:
WapinterMajharul SaiifCan't blame
koniosofficial but let's see.