What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty

[JoeBriggs]

The best one is always the bounty, where the ICO is already successful and reached the Soft Cap, that's an insurance that you'll get your tokens, but it depends on the bounty manager too, I know many of them, from whom you never get tokens.

[Chronner]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

We need to first determine - which is the bounty company. If Twitter and FB, then you can go into everything. Except, of course, 100% of the skam is visible even with the naked eye

[CryptYeah]

Well, there is no one specific parameter, you need to evaluate both ann thread, and site, and the collected (and planned) amount, the number of posts in social networks, their informativeness, cooperation with other ICOs, finally the manager's reputation, real persons in the team and so Further......

[ovcijisir]

My criteria:

1. Team - experience and competences
2. Whitepaper - does it make sense?
3. Final product - is it useful, does it make someones life easier?

[tamango]

Actually the most important criteria I consider is to find a well known bounty manager with high reputation because if bounty manager is not ok even if the project will be succesful  there can be lots of problems with stakes count and distribution too...

[bttmember]

Yeah mostly big communities are due to airdrops and bounty campaigns so you are very right that big communities are not a solid criteria to pick and choose a project, if you are looking for a quality bounty campaign do everything that an investor will do before investing in the ico, so if  the project passes your quality checks and due diligence only then you should promote it.

[Pecunia non olet]

The bounty manager, I have participated in many Sandra´s campaign and I didnt have any problem with her campaign, so I am loyal to her cacampaigns.

[Yucco]

Unfortunately, what many consider to be the right criteria for the success of the project - does not always work. Whitepeper and the road map are important things, yes, but sometimes people who do not have a project do it. You need to have information about the team.

[anjiitem]

how many friends Facebook / followers on twitter has a small chance in the success of a bounty, of course the most important thing in the success of a bounty is a team of developers who are able to plan strategies so that bounty achieve success

[cryptosuotor]

First of all you need to do research on the bounty projects, Secondly you need to look at the team of the projects because the team alone plays a vital role in the project for it to be outstanding.

[hackzang12]

The bounty manager, I have participated in many Sandra´s campaign and I didnt have any problem with her campaign, so I am loyal to her cacampaigns.

Me as well they manage carefully the bounties they are promoting and their projects are pretty good. No such failure maybe some projects tends to be failed. I think good bounty will start from the developer and the team. Bounty manager will handle that if he/she has high reputation before and endorse by high ranking accounts.

[marcripto]

For many months I make a careful selection before participating in a bounty campaign. I check everything a bit, but the main things in my opinion are the whitepaper, which must be of very good quality, the team that must be formed by people with a good curriculum and professional advisor,s and a roadmap of the project that is credible

[yrrehc16]

First and foremost, if you want to join a very good bounty...
make sure that bounty has a very good ICO and TEAM...
bounty always depends on the Team that manages the ICO and how will their ICO project be.

[rodney0404]

I honestly collecting bounties based on bounty manager, total allocation of the campaign and the ICO ratings. But if you looking for a good bounty then look for the team's background, whitepaper, website, community and a working product.

[BitkoinJonny]

I've seen a lot of same topics. Why did you create it again? Try to use forume and find information what you need!

[solarion]

I honestly collecting bounties based on bounty manager, total allocation of the campaign and the ICO ratings. But if you looking for a good bounty then look for the team's background, whitepaper, website, community and a working product.

I hope recent days most of the bounty hunters understood the complete the ICO bounty how to pick from the forum. Please do not believe all the ICO rating sites because ICO projects are not meant all the time to make money if the team does not have real worth to invest.

White paper only thing to enough to understand the project. Then one of thing project road map is about for 2 years more means you need to invest on the project they take back ahead.

[rajdeep12]

There are so many ways to choose a good bounty  but the best criteria to judge a good bounty is as follows :
 1: To read all given instructions carefully in Bounty campaign.
 2: check their team, their connections ,their work and their experience.
 3: Identify the objective of the project.
 4: Whitepaper and an existing working are also helping in choosing a good ICO bounty

[Olgdanil]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

For me, the best criterion when choosing a campaign bounty is a good project. Earlier I tried to choose managers, but as time showed they do not greatly value their reputation.

[007_cryptoone]

If you have a lot of time and you want to spend it with benefit for yourself and other people, then I advise you to come here and learn about the prospective project. P2PS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3267287
https://www.p2psf.org

[GantVolnov]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

The most important criterion is certainly a worthy project. It is very important that there is at least an MVP and that the idea is not a copy of another existing project. The market is full of projects with the same ideas, of course competition is good, but after the ICO, most of them just disappear