What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty

[asus09]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

I think that is a risk, as well as investing. that's why every ico project has a considerable level of risk compared to investing in an altcoin that has entered the exchange. so, the conclusion
every ico campaign that you will follow must be studied first like when you want to try investing

[olsyd]

I think there are two criterias that point that bounty is good - reached soft cap and working minimum viable product

[Lilmon]

 I basically look into the crypto arena based on the quality of the project they have and the product they intend to offer the market, without a quality product, the project is as good as failed as this is the sole marketing source. Then look at the development team of the project, a competent development team experienced enough to come up with a good project suitable of the market is also a key factor

[CoinCollect]

The most important thing to look at when choosing an ICO is the team and the project. If the project is promising and there is probably already a finished product, then it remains only to see what the development team is working on it. It is worth investing in such ICO, although it is still necessary to invest in them only in the long term, for at least 2 years.

[Btcjoglyn]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

Definitely Yes,we should check all social media for the ICO project to join. It is one of the assurance that the ICO is not scam and have a good platforms. The community members always follow if the ICO is clearly stated in their website. This is an important keys on how to join a successful investment.

[maitexisi]

The white paper is undoubtedly an important document we can judge the project, and it is also worth evaluating the website and the team, which is also an important part of the success of the project. Of course, popularity is also an important factor for the success of this project.

[Rengga Jati]

The best criteria to judge that the bounty is good or not can be seen from:
a. The bounty manager (see the rank and trac record)
b. Token allocation and percentage for each campaign
c. The ICO to be promoted has reached the softcap
d. It promotes the ICO with the ready products

[Levious]

I think it's the most intuitive way to see if a community of projects is huge. For the choice of bounty, because you don't have the time to browse every bounty website or read the white paper for each project, but the community number of members is what you can see at a glance.

[ShamoKe]

My principle is to see the feasibility of the project, and the power behind the project. I am referring to the partner. A good project will have many big companies to support them. Such a project will make you make a lot of money.

[modmalaney]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

bounty hunter team certainly not paying attention to the wrong things. with an experienced team, it will make a project can walk well and smoothly. even the usual project alone will be wonderful when handled by a team of top-quality indeed. However, it is also a whitepaper content from a concept in critical limits stretcher by the team and this will complement each other.

[fitraridwan]

in my opinion, a good bounty to follow is a bounty that has a large big allocation because with that the bounty hunters will get the satisfactory results. other than that a good bounty is a bounty that has tokens or coins with high prices. usually, a lot of projects have coins and the price when sold the price is below in ico

[jwelkem]

We have to base in their undertaking like in the event that they can go extremely prominent here in crypto so case of it currently are trade.io and eo.trade obviously even they not advance here in gathering I figure they will swing great to a well known exchanging site in light of their stage and a considerable measure of genuine users,traders and speculators will utilize this something else we can depend to the designer like on the off chance that they officially here in crypto and know as a useful for crypto or they effectively mainstream here obviously in the event that he/she run a crusade here in crypto obviously that is useful for each users,traders and financial specialists

[kalstarzz]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

when I join a gift, the criteria that I put forward the most is a project that really runs in the world. for example bank-based projects etc.

[Hanazawa]

For my few knowledge about bounty projects the best criteria to judge a particular bounty are those person behind the project. For me not all large number of community on a some projects is only basis to determine if it has a poor chances you to become successful. Because sometimes the more developers the great project is always there and aslo having a real platforms and whitepapers with a purpose is one of the good basis of bounty project.

[cryptowolfsu]

The most important for me is the idea and the vision  behind the project, for what a problem is it a solution for.
After that looking at the team is it experienced enough to fulfil the goals of the project. After that looking to the
social and marketing aspects.

[Crypto_circuit]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

It goes just beyond that, even if a project have large community which is mostly inflated by airdrop participants. They project might still fail.
You need to do some research about the authenticity of the project and then go ahead to do some basic plus and minus (research) to know how much the team allocate for the bounty campaign.

some of this campaign even if they are real, allocate pennies for their campaign and you wouldn't want to work for the long period of time only to receive penny at the end of the period.

[mandeepcrypto]

If you want to judge the good bounty first check the idea secondly check the resume of team member,white paper and road map of the bounty. These things help you to select good bounty.

[gabbie2010]

While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.

Having checked on some of those criteria mentioned above some bounties still turned scam despite having a sound technical whitepaper, did you consider ICOs not reaching Soft Cap? due to already established project similar to the one you are involved.

[Totodecaan120]

I analyze many things before participating in a bounty campaign. In my opinion, it is not very important that at the beginning the project does not have a large community of members that follow it, the most important things are having a valuable project having a team made up of high-level professionals that will be able to develop the project.

[Markscott86]

most important criteria I consider is to find a well known bounty manager with high reputation because if bounty manager is not ok even if the project will be succesful  there can be lots of problems with stakes count.