Stringent laws!

[vova.andreyan.94]

To anything it will not, because basically the whole cryptocurrency is decentralized.

[musta5a]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

to me, it doesn't matter, because I will be using them anyway. If the laws are too inconvenient to comply with, I will simply dodge them and keep using crypto in an unregulated way

[heyou80]

Strict laws mark binding and legitimacy, while protecting the interests of both buyers and sellers, but do not affect the changes in the cryptocurrency market.

[matej451]

Stringent laws on stock exchange did not stop the bubble happened till 2008. If people see profit they will rush in.

If there are 5 friends that tell you invest here and you will have *5 tomorrow everyone rush in. If media (tv, radio, newspaper...) helps with that, it does not mater much is there rules or not.

when it comes to getting money there are no rules.

[LimePleasant]

Even if there are some rules, most projects develop despite their existence. What makes me more confident about the project is the team behind it and the idea in itself.

[freshbcash]

Clearly, the regulation of cryptocurrencies at the legislative level to increase people's loyalty to the crypto market. Will buy more.

[BTC_ADA]

I think that strict laws will only impose a fairly significant tax on the crypto currency and will be a plus to the state Treasury and nothing more.

[melamiras]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

You need the right laws, just as you need the right text size in your post. Into the topic: There is going to be many different legislations as there are many tax havens.

[Utyg]

the law is designed to enslave one class to another. The upper class writes its own laws. Laws for themselves. From this it follows that if the state learns to regulate the cryptocurrency. Lost the whole essence of the scripts

[cryptosyss]

No, I don't think so. Strict laws for us-it is generally unrealistic. And laws often contradict each other, so it is difficult to come up with such a reliable legislative framework.

[ivanleon]

Laws must be thought out, not just prohibitive. Bad and stupid laws can only slow down progress, and too strict is not needed. Legislators should develop them better.

[cryptobiolog]

Perhaps, a strict legal framework will increase the reliability of the crypto currency, but then its meaning will disappear. It will be controlled and will become another tool of the state.

[ProstoCrypta]

No, I think it would just be a nuisance. Laws should help people, not the other way around. With the cryptocurrency of the same.

[earn20]

It may be so. But if they show up as now laws about bitcoin is not - if there is something they are still under development.

[big_bankir]

Yes and no. Undoubtedly, the introduction of strict laws will create a shell of confidence in this area, reduce the number of fraudulent organizations, but such a free and successful for ordinary citizens, this area will no longer be.

[kent47400]

It must be done because all of it is for the convenience of the owner of the token.
For example in my country if the ICO is held the government does not interfere if there is a loss or profit that is generated but the Government gives a legal umbrella if the ICO is fraud.

[Hammonds]

If a strict law might provide the best for the token.
Suppose an ICO is legally licensed from the financial community or from the government, so the ICO is good for admission.