Looking for the funniest trust feedback.

[xtraelv]

 

Both positive and negative - I'd like to compile a list of the funniest ones. I was looking a VODs feedback and found a few I found amusing ones.

Some scammers might not have morals but they do have a sense of humor.



He scams children for drug money too - kinda implies that the person who wrote that scams children for drug money.

[pugman]

The second made me laugh. I have seen  better funny feedbacks, all of them being butt-hurt. But still gave a good laugh. BRB, I have to look at TP's trust wall.  

Found some:




This guy tells the same thing over and over again in like 10 more ratings.

[xtraelv]

https://i.imgur.com/xMKoX4I.png
Hilariousandco the rapper


https://i.imgur.com/qEePt8z.png
The pharmacist is on drugs yet ecardking can't decide whether he sent BTC or is supposed to be receiving it...


https://i.imgur.com/wGSxHnU.png
Wasted sperm? Didn't Monty Python make a song about that ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk


https://i.imgur.com/ic3LHAA.png

[madnessteat]

[Jet Cash]

Well I posted that "Vod ate my hampster". Should I add that to his trust? If so. Is that positive or negative?

[xtraelv]

Well I posted that "Vod ate my hampster". Should I add that to his trust? If so. Is that positive or negative?

That just reminded me of:

Lauda is a WITCH, who cast an evil spell on me! BURN THE WITCH!

It did not go unnoticed that nullius completely disappeared soon after that accusation was made.

Which is a far more serious charge than Vod eating your familiar.


I think as a scambuster Vod rescued you from a terrible fate.


https://i.imgur.com/KEx1HmA.png

[Joel_Jantsen]

Not sure if this one counts as funny but definitely counts as retarded. I know he had mental issues and stuff but this feedback is way too off, I mean I have no idea what pills have he had been swallowing. (Just so you know, I haven't met this guy in real life)

[xtraelv]

Not sure if this one counts as funny but definitely counts as retarded. I know he had mental issues and stuff but this feedback is way too off, I mean I have no idea what pills have he had been swallowing. (Just so you know, I haven't met this guy in real life)

Vod tried to eat his hamster too ?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

<snip>

Yeah, that's what I hate about retaliatory feedback.  When you're not required to reference a transaction, you can just make shit up and to someone who doesn't care to look any deeper than what the feedback says, it would look like I scammed someone.  Used to drive me nuts, but I've gotten used to it.

There's one feedback I got from isoneguy, a feedback troll who's disappeared, that I find funny:  "engaged in activities that led to the injury of an animal".  That idiot left the same feedback for multiple people for whatever reason.

This is a good thread.  I've often searched eBay looking for funny feedbacks.  Some of them are hilarious.

Edit:  I just noticed Joel_Jantsen wrote about isoneguy's feedbacks.  Whoops!

Whilst on my hunt for a specific feedback comment I see that a few users have just spammed the feedback of certain users which separate ratings. I kind of wished there was a limitation on how many times you can give a person trust every 30 days or something.

I agree.  I'm used to all the retaliatory feedback now, but that doesn't mean it's an ideal system.  When you can leave any feedback you want for any user, it can and does get abused. 

My memory is a little shoddy from all the substances, but I think I recall a time when you could leave feedbacks on eBay for whoever you wanted, and you didn't need to do a documented deal with them, as is required today and has been for a long time.  The feedback system here does facilitate the community catching scammers and assorted lowlifes because of the lack of that requirement, but I've always felt it could use some adjustment.  Unfortunately I don't have a better idea, so I've mostly kept silent.

[Welsh]

Whilst on my hunt for a specific feedback comment I see that a few users have just spammed the feedback of certain users which separate ratings. I kind of wished there was a limitation on how many times you can give a person trust every 30 days or something.

[xtraelv]

Whilst on my hunt for a specific feedback comment I see that a few users have just spammed the feedback of certain users which separate ratings. I kind of wished there was a limitation on how many times you can give a person trust every 30 days or something.

I agree.  I'm used to all the retaliatory feedback now, but that doesn't mean it's an ideal system.  When you can leave any feedback you want for any user, it can and does get abused.  

My memory is a little shoddy from all the substances, but I think I recall a time when you could leave feedbacks on eBay for whoever you wanted, and you didn't need to do a documented deal with them, as is required today and has been for a long time.  The feedback system here does facilitate the community catching scammers and assorted lowlifes because of the lack of that requirement, but I've always felt it could use some adjustment.  Unfortunately I don't have a better idea, so I've mostly kept silent.

I suppose there is another way of looking at retaliatory feedback as well.

Others read your feedback and knowing that you are not a scammer they may tag the scammer as well.

I had to laugh at some of the retaliatory feedback - they link back to the thread where they are proven a scammer.



The "evidence" provided on this one is so silly that it made me laugh. Probably not the effect they were aiming for. Maybe I should add it to the thread for a bit of fake street credibility and notoriety.

[Flying Hellfish]

This was one of my fav's from back in the early days of ASIC miner development.



By the way OP you should do a post about all the ASIC mining companies that took in 10's maybe 100's of millions and never delivered or just folded.

A few that come to mind:

-BFL (reportedly took in 25 million themselves)
-Avalon's (first miner sent to a dev was making fucking insane money, like $2000 a day iirc
 while BFL dropped the ball or mined for themselves with customer equipment LOL)
-Basic (probably the first true ASIC scam, Tom took in a pile of btc and never even worked on
 designing or producing and ASIC LOL, after the BTC priced spiked huge he started paying back
 USD valued refunds, likely leaving him with a nice pile of coins for himself)
-KNC (and their datorhall LOL)
-Terraminer
-Hashfast (and their promise to return btc for btc if they didn't deliver on time, they didn't and they
 didn't refund btc for btc, also cypherdoc and his 3000 BTC payment!)
-ASICminer (freidcat that was interesting to watch as it developed).
-Bitmine (and his lambo)

The list goes on and on, I haven't even mentioned the integrator scams, fuck they were rampant for a few months!

[xtraelv]

This was one of my fav's from back in the early days of ASIC miner development.



By the way OP you should do a post about all the ASIC mining companies that took in 10's maybe 100's of millions and never delivered or just folded.

A few that come to mind:

-BFL (reportedly took in 25 million themselves)
-Avalon's (first miner sent to a dev was making fucking insane money, like $2000 a day iirc
 while BFL dropped the ball or mined for themselves with customer equipment LOL)
-Basic (probably the first true ASIC scam, Tom took in a pile of btc and never even worked on
 designing or producing and ASIC LOL, after the BTC priced spiked huge he started paying back
 USD valued refunds, likely leaving him with a nice pile of coins for himself)
-KNC (and their datorhall LOL)
-Terraminer
-Hashfast (and their promise to return btc for btc if they didn't deliver on time, they didn't and they
 didn't refund btc for btc, also cypherdoc and his 3000 BTC payment!)
-ASICminer (freidcat that was interesting to watch as it developed).
-Bitmine (and his lambo)

The list goes on and on, I haven't even mentioned the integrator scams, fuck they were rampant for a few months!

LOL thats a crazyrabbi alright !

That is a great idea ! None of the history threads I've done so far cover any of the mining companies that went broke or were outright scams. I nearly fell victim to some of them myself. History on Bitcointalk - Mining equipment scams, shams and failed deliveries. - I've started it but it will be a work in progress for some time.

yesminers nearly took my money years ago - fortunately I googled "yesminer scam" just before placing an order and bought antminers instead.