Women have to take the lead!

[oda.krell]

(1) The following statement is true:

Women ≠ Men

(2) The following statements are false:

Men > Women
Women > Men

(3) Anyone who refutes (1) and/or (2) is a fucking retard.  

Can you name one invention of significant value created by a woman?
I can name many useful inventions by men, simply looking around my house.

Do you know any woman who has the physical strength to move her own furniture?

I'll start. Let me know when you want me to stop

co-discoverer of DNA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin

First compiler (you fucking clown wouldn't be able to be on this forum, if it weren't for her)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_compiler_construction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

Early radioactivity research, also: 2 (TWO) motherfucking Nobel prizes, one in physics, one in chemistry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie

Noether's theorem. Don't even bother trying to understand it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

But, hey, you asked "find me something in my house". Well then, the automated dishwasher maybe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishwasher#History
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephine_Cochrane


I know your response already: "But but but in PERCENTAGE women had much less impact/total Nobel prizes/etc". Well, yes, dear clown. Of course they did... Until <100 years ago, they weren't allowed to get university level degrees in most countries. We'll have this discussion again in 50 to 60 years, when a few more generations of women in the developed world had unconditional access to higher education. Not that it matters to you, of course: retard stays retard, no matter what dangles (or doesn't dangle) between your legs.

[Vexatious]

(1) The following statement is true:

Women ≠ Men

(2) The following statements are false:

Men > Women
Women > Men

(3) Anyone who refutes (1) and/or (2) is a fucking retard.  

Can you name one invention of significant value created by a woman?
I can name many useful inventions by men, simply looking around my house.

Do you know any woman who has the physical strength to move her own furniture?

I'll start. Let me know when you want me to stop

co-discoverer of DNA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin

First compiler (you fucking clown wouldn't be able to be on this forum, if it weren't for her)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_compiler_construction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

Early radioactivity research, also: 2 (TWO) motherfucking Nobel prizes, one in physics, one in chemistry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie

Noether's theorem. Don't even bother trying to understand it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

But, hey, you asked "find me something in my house". Well then, the automated dishwasher maybe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishwasher#History
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephine_Cochrane


I know your response already: "But but but in PERCENTAGE women had much less impact/total Nobel prizes/etc". Well, yes, dear clown. Of course they did... Until <100 years ago, they weren't allowed to get university level degrees in most countries. We'll have this discussion again in 50 to 60 years, when a few more generations of women in the developed world had unconditional access to higher education. Not that it matters to you, of course: retard stays retard, no matter what dangles (or doesn't dangle) between your legs.

^this

[BADecker]

...

I know your response already: "But but but in PERCENTAGE women had much less impact/total Nobel prizes/etc". Well, yes, dear clown. Of course they did... Until <100 years ago, they weren't allowed to get university level degrees in most countries. We'll have this discussion again in 50 to 60 years, when a few more generations of women in the developed world had unconditional access to higher education. Not that it matters to you, of course: retard stays retard, no matter what dangles (or doesn't dangle) between your legs.

But why weren't women allowed? And who didn't allow them? Is there something in nature that keeps women down? Or is it the physical strength of the men? Perhaps it is women, themselves.

Here's the point about this issue. Women only want, by nature, things like "impact/total Nobel prizes/etc" as a secondary thing. Why? Because women have something built into them that makes them disregard all else. That thing is machinery to make babies.

ALL (100%) of the women want children. Some want more security, first. But if the security were there, women wouldn't care much about the Internet or Bitcoin. All they would care about is having children. Again, why? Because they have the machinery built right into them, and it drives them in a powerful way.

Men have some small percent of such machinery. But it is way smaller in men than it is in women. Because of this, men aren't going to be distracted by it as much. Men will be able to focus on pure innovation much more easily. The practicality that women have exists because they are (deep down, in a basic way) securing what it takes to have and raise children safely and securely. Security usually doesn't involve innovation. It involves correct use of what exists already.

[BittBurger]

I don't know if this was already posted, but there seems to be an unofficial Bitcoin page for women on Facebook:

Women in Bitcoin:
https://www.facebook.com/womeninbitcoin

Seems fairly chill there, but I see a photo of a recent meetup with Andreas Antonopoulos attending so that was pretty cool.

There are also 3 female friends of mine among the 100 current likes. 

-B-

[7Priest7]

Bleeding once a month and being physically weak.

No thanks.

Intellectually woman can be on a equal level.
Intelligence is only one of many factors to weigh.

[oda.krell]

Bleeding once a month and being physically weak.

No thanks.

Intellectually woman can be on a equal level.
Intelligence is only one of many factors to weigh.

Okay, so the physical side... I'm not sure exactly how bad the monthly bleeding is compared to male pattern baldness, the need to drag a sharp blade across your face every day before you even had a coffee, and dying on average 5 to 10 years earlier than women, but yeah... there's no point arguing about physical strength. We're stronger, on average. Wheeeee!

(actually, being strong is kind of awesome. sorry ladies. but you got the better boobs :D)

[Cryptocables]

This thread is full of lulz.

The misogyny in this thread is also pretty funny. But it's pretty much expected when (some, not all) men have their manhood threatened. For those in this category, go have a wank and come back to me when ya have a clear head.Keep it coming! Heuheheh, see wat I did?

Just because we don't publicly announce ourselves or act as "Bit Booth Babes" doesn't mean we don't exist here. The mankini's are out of style and we just blend with the bros. Plus its not summer here yet in the USA and haven't had time to trim our pubes from "No shave November" to wear that stuff anyway. For realz.

Also, anyone got pro tips for keeping my cat off my miners as a personal space heater? Bitch doesn't know the word no.

Any halp appreciated. PLX

crypt0queen

[Cryptocables]

Bleeding once a month and being physically weak.

No thanks.

Intellectually woman can be on a equal level.
Intelligence is only one of many factors to weigh.

This is pretty funny considering that you need to have a wank to have a clear mind at LEAST once a week (day? hour?) as a male. Fluids are coming out of your body too in just a different way to flush out the cloud. Just saying'.

Where yo headddddddd at, wheres it at? /Basement Jaxx

[keithers]

We must motivate them and find a way to make it so easy to use, a 4-year-old Boy could handle it without a problem.

So lets make things easy for the Women, we'll all profit from it.

This part made me giggle.   You don't give women to much credit for their intelligence?  haha

[Honeypot]

Women, be proud of your own specialties instead of trying to behave as men.

Some of the strongest and most respected women I've met throughout my life are those who were fully invested and dedicated towards their own sphere of influence, and no husband or son dared question her authority on such matters.

While you might stupidly believe wearing a suit and acting 'professional' is supposedly a way to 'equality', you are not doing yourself any favors by being a walking sign post of 'I am trying to compensate' and generally acting in a very fragile, insecure way.

Women have their own spheres of influence and specialties that are just as respectable and in many ways much more valuable then your expendable gender counterparts. If you can't respect yourself and constantly bitch and moan like a 12 year old girl who just got her period, don't expect others to truly respect you.

While women may not necessarily 'take the lead' in majority of the cases, that alone does not mean women are inferior. Men have limitations in areas that women do not. Be proud of who you are and secure in your identity, instead of trying to stupidly compensate for some kind of perceived feelings of subservience.

Men or women, people NEVER respect those who are afraid, shaken, and insecure as many 'professional' women are.

[Chellger]

The thing with Women is: Why are they becoming strong now? Because they are allowed to. But real power is not granted, it is taken. Feminism is a luxury and we as a society can only afford it now. Feminism does not contribute, it takes away and offers nothing. Feminism is a child.

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App

[Honeypot]

The thing with Women is: Why are they becoming strong now? Because they are allowed to. But real power is not granted, it is taken. Feminism is a luxury and we as a society can only afford it now. Feminism does not contribute, it takes away and offers nothing. Feminism is a child.

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App

It is a delusion. Just a bunch of posh girls and 'women' acting out as if they can make their spoiled and soft ways a common reality under the very system they claim to hate but actually guarentees their luxury.

Respect is earned, not granted.

No man or women is above the responsibility that comes with your rights or privileges. Women better get their heads screwed on straight if they don't want this bitch fest to eventually set back women's position a hundred years in the near future.

[bitpop]

.

[bitcoin_girl]

I agree 100%

[bitpop]

.

[angrynerd88]

Really! We have to get Women on Board.

You know, i consider myself a Feminist, and its just unfair that nobody helps Women to get into Bitcoin. We will all suffer, because there are no Women around. And I'll tell you the Reason why: I've just read that Thread about if Women use Bitcoin or not and I stumbled over some quote from some Woman-Reporter. She mentioned, that Women are responsible for so and so many sales (Like Trillions) and it is a missed opportunity if you don't have them on board because then they will spend the money elsewhere.

Now we have to realize that a Woman will never bother to buy a coin, because that is nerdy and Women don't like nerdy. And Woman SHOULD not buy the coin, they should WANT the coin because of what you can DO with the Coin. Women will help Bitcoin, because they wont hoard it. No Woman hoards money. They will spend it as fast as they can, thus finally giving Bitcoin the possibility to be a real currency. That is one MAJOR problem solved. With Women - Dont make it about the coin, make it about the amenities you have have with it. Women want to buy stuff that is A) expensive, B) fun, C) makes their girlfriends jealous and D) sparkles. Bitcoin has NONE of these qualities and - lets face it - wont ever have. So we can state, that Bitcoin is not apealing to Women, which is a shame, because Women are very important.

It is right, what the Woman-Reporter said. Women do buy lots of stuff, they spend so fucking much money. But they like things to be easy and smooth and to sparkle. It MUST not be complicated, it must not be necessary to think about what you're doing and it must not feel nerdy or creepy, but super-awesome. It must be as easy as opening your wallet and take the money out. As of yet you will have to help a Woman to make a transaction with Bitcoin every time, because they can't be bothered learning how to do it, be it one transaction, be it 1000. You'll alwasy start at step one. Bitcoin-Transactions are just something no Woman wants (or should have) to learn, because she really has other concerns, like dressing nice and going to the Prom and be an actress. As a Feminist I say, we as a community are doing WAY to little to help Woman come to use Bitcoin.

An Example: You know why Apple has had its huge success? WOMEN bought it because its easy. You basically can't do shit with an Ipad, because its so locked up, but its oh sooo easy to use. Everything that is hard is not for the Women! It really is not. Women are the real driving force in the economy. They have the financial power and often the say in spendings. Big commercial hits have all been EASY. Same with EVERY major thing in the last 20 years. Look at the adaption-rate of the Internet. The Women only started to come in after the modems died. Modems virtually scared the Women away from the internet, made strange noises and just did not feel right. Why should a Woman have to wait for Internets, feeling uncomfortable and scared by those strange noises? Dial-up was way to complicated, like 10times to complicated. But we managed this problem and made Internet as easy as 1-2-3 and then even easier. And -bam- came the Women. They all came! To make things short: If you want something to suceed - WOMEN must want it and then it HAS to be easy.

Bitcoin is NOT easy. Its just not. You know that. Think from a female perspective. Bitcoin is not funny, it does not make you laugh or feel good and there is nothing to feel. But these are the core-assests for Women. What is being done to enable Women to handle Bitcoins? We must motivate them and find a way to make it so easy to use, a 4-year-old Boy could handle it without a problem. Thats an exaggeration, but you get the point. I think this is one MAJOR direction we have to go with Bitcoin to really arrive at the Mainstream and get the money flowing in.

So lets make things easy for the Women, we'll all profit from it.

Edit: Had to clarify things, it was a little to feminist, I toned that down a little.

tell the girls that they can make money fast. They will get inside as soon as they can. Maybe they will need a nerd friend for that purpose and that nerd friend will need his (sexual)  reward. Yeah.

[oda.krell]

This thread really brings out the worst in some of you guys... "20 to 30 year old whores... Almost all worthless"..."If women wanted to be respected, why do their profile pictures always look like that..."  The neckbeard is strong in that one!

ITT you guys desperately need some female contact other than your mom and the phone sex operator.

[hammo]

But on a serious note, if women want to be heard and respected then head over to www.nobs.is where the female community has a fair say and their ideas are appreciated.

[bitpop]

.

[hammo]

I am bitter, yes
But I also can't respect them if they don't even respect themselves

Maybe, just maybe you spend too much time on the wrong sites. I doubt women would care to be respected by you, because it's unlikely they would even give you the time of day.