[ANN] [WORLD FIRST] TiPS - built-in coin mixing/anonymity service just launched!

[hamiltino]

2% is way to much for coin mixing.

[srs2xcvbnm]

2% is way to much for coin mixing.

2% for using world's first mixing service that give you 100% anonymity and endless freedom when spending your coins,
or doing as you wish with them.

"Much" you say? Well usually this kind of service with fiat currencies is quite a shady business, and usually
fee ranges between 50-80%. Looks like you only spend on ice cream and aroma candles and towels. Good citizen.

[pechak]

Comparing to Darkcoin anonymous technology, what is the difference between the two?

[BitcoinSteve]

TIPS thats it, the fedora got lost, admit, accept, GROW!!!!

[bigc1984]

TIPS thats it, the fedora got lost, admit, accept, GROW!!!!

WoW... Tips just KILLED it. This feature just made TIPS a top coin.

[xtreme1280]

This is great news, keep up the good work.

[Ceday]

This is great! Lookin good 

[Fargusson]

Start spreading the news

I'm leaving today

I wanna be a part of it

New TIIIIIPS

[643399]

Has launched?

[srs2xcvbnm]

Has launched?

YUP, 12hrs, 35min ago.

[johnnycoiner]

uhmmmmm ..

I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  
 

Code:

Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{    if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
        throw runtime_error(
            "sendtoaddress <fedoracoinaddress>[:mixed] <amount> [comment] [comment-to]\n"
            "<amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
            "coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
            + HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));

    string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
    size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
  bool bMixCoins = false;
    if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
    {
        string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
        strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
        bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
    }

    CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
    if (!address.IsValid())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");

    // Amount
    uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);

    // Wallet comments
    CWalletTx wtx;
    if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
    if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["to"]      = params[3].get_str();

    if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");

    string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
    if (strError != "")
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);

    return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}

Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638


If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates  bMixCoins ... and that is all  

It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work.

REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet.

[Fargusson]

uhmmmmm ..

I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  
 

Code:

Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{    if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
        throw runtime_error(
            "sendtoaddress <fedoracoinaddress>[:mixed] <amount> [comment] [comment-to]\n"
            "<amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
            "coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
            + HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));

    string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
    size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
  bool bMixCoins = false;
    if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
    {
        string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
        strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
        bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
    }

    CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
    if (!address.IsValid())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");

    // Amount
    uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);

    // Wallet comments
    CWalletTx wtx;
    if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
    if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["to"]      = params[3].get_str();

    if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");

    string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
    if (strError != "")
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);

    return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}

Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638


If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates  bMixCoins ... and that is all  

It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work.

REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet.

And we all thank johnnycoiner for this whole new trollworthy topic 

[srs2xcvbnm]

uhmmmmm ..

I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  
 

Code:

Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{    if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
        throw runtime_error(
            "sendtoaddress <fedoracoinaddress>[:mixed] <amount> [comment] [comment-to]\n"
            "<amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
            "coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
            + HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));

    string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
    size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
  bool bMixCoins = false;
    if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
    {
        string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
        strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
        bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
    }

    CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
    if (!address.IsValid())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");

    // Amount
    uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);

    // Wallet comments
    CWalletTx wtx;
    if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
    if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
        wtx.mapValue["to"]      = params[3].get_str();

    if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");

    string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
    if (strError != "")
        throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);

    return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}

Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638


If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates  bMixCoins ... and that is all  

It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work.

REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet.

Mixing code was not released. It is not open source (yet).

[superresistant]

I have a serious question. Maybe it has been answered but I can't find an answer.

Does TiPS (Fedora?) need to be Proof-of-Work in order for the mixing service to work ?

Thanks in advance.

[srs2xcvbnm]

And we all thank johnnycoiner for this whole new trollworthy topic 

He should probably just go back to his pumps.
And first of all, he should stop trolling from his primary school's computer.

[643399]

Has launched?

YUP, 12hrs, 35min ago.

Wallet prompted to update to 8 weeks ago?? It started???

[fraggyb]

Best news or best news?

[srs2xcvbnm]

Has launched?

YUP, 12hrs, 35min ago.

Wallet prompted to update to 8 weeks ago?? It started???

Right now I do not understand what you actually wrote man.

[blueangel01]

What is the purpose of this: RPC user system, become your own web wallet!?

[r-ando]

The RPC web wallet element will be explained in the next update, its part of more innovative ideas coming to Fedoracoin soon