Digital anarchy!!!
you mean digital capitalism. property rights and anarchy are pretty much the opposite. if you don't understand anything, just ask.
That's not 100% accurate, unless you are confusing "property rights" with "private ownership of the means of production" which is generally referred in Marxism as "private property". Most original archists (Bakunin, Sorel, Proudhon... Even Kropotkin) were not against "personal property" (or "possession"), they were opposed to "private property" as all the thinkers influenced by the works of Karl Marx.
To clarify:
Personal property (or "possessions") = your house, your clothes, your kids toys, etc. The vast majority of anarchists were totally OK with personal property and agreed that nobody has the right to take that from you. Even communists agreed on that.
Private property = the land, the factory, etc. Anarchists believed that the owners of the means of production should be the workers themselves. If you are working a certain piece of land, then you decide directly what you do with the fruit of your labor. Nobody else can (not even the "state" or "the party" as communist say). If you are working for somebody else (a boss, or the state, or whatever) then you are "alienated" and inherently not free.
But yes, if what you meant is that anarchism and capitalism are pretty much the opposite, then you are right - in fact anarchism was born precisely as a reaction against capitalist society.
Capitalism just means "an economic system in which industry and the means of production are controlled by private owners" (that's the first line on "capitalism" on Wikipedia - a definition first used precisely by Karl Marx), and anarchism was strongly opposed to that. Just do not tell this to the US folks reading this forum who have had their brain washed by Rothbard's absurd "anarcho-capitalist" theory, which is pure and simply an oxymoron (don't know if he was trolling or just a retarded, but his "work" made quite an impact on US culture). Anarchism is about absolute freedom - no RULER, and that means no STATE and no BOSSES (private or public) and no WAGE SLAVERY. No coercition at all. That's the very foundation of anarchism - being anti-capitalist. If you have to do what someone else wants you to do in order to earn a salary, then that's the opposite of what Anarchism means.
Last but not least, Bitcoin has NOTHING to do with "digital anarchy".
(mods: sorry for the offtopic. Please move this to the appropiate subforum if you think its necessary).
Poll
