Is it possible to do this?

[cupruri]

Sure, we need some way to regulate ICO projects, because there are too much scam projects at the moment, that are trying to trick investors and bounty hunters. I hope that during the next year we will see a huge pump.

[1714841560]

1714841560

[avonka]

It would be nice to have a decentralized system which regulates ICOs. The spending of ICOs funds should be transparent and the market should be regulated to avoid that the investors are scammed and hunters not payed. It is easier to be said than done, but hopefully there will be a solution for that in the near future.

[NORD YGGDRASIL]

What you say has long been discussed by so many people in the world of cryptocurrency. There are a lot of ready-made solutions that in the very near future will can help solve this problem. One of these solutions is the solution proposed by the ICOVO project. You can familiarize yourself with it - this is a rather interesting concept.

[SinisterBountyHunter]

That would be a better idea. Because we hunters are struggling for every project verifying. But with this, we can join with ease and submit informations without any problems.

[Bitfling]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

I am agree that too many scam ICOs this year. Many investor losing their money and there is no way back. I am thinking that government regulation needed to regulate new ICOs. Government should take an action to protect their people investment

[bananaunana]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

Yes, but for the team. They have to be transparent because they want our money which we should invest. If they are not hiding anything and are required to be responsible for a scam they will care to avoid scam and be honest. If not they have to held responsible for fraud.

[castiloros]

between the investor and the ICO is indeed most do not have a connecting bridge. This is going to be quite important for the sake of the success and smooth running of a project. with the existence of a verification system will make the project into a narrow space of fraud in the ICO which is pretty much the case.

[raitsuk]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

Regulation is indeed needed to control the possibilities of any scam project who are just trying to steal the investors money and deceiving the bounty participant. But until today that kind of regulation is still not fully available to controll that.

[chuoinguyen227]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

I totally agree with you. Today there are too many ICOs projects. And it seems impossible to know what is a good project and what is a scam project.

Scam projects are too many. Bounty hunters are exploited and become referrals it to everyone. This makes more and more people fooled. There must be something to protect investors and bounty hunters from this.

[powerman24]

We definitely need a verification system preferably a global one and not an over complicated one which would kill the legit businesses.

[semobo]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

intermediate means what? Going to act like an escrow for the funds then how you can be trusted it is also same like the banking centralized money system.

[Mikhail.YT]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

i think there should be bounty smart contract or bounty distribution function in ico smart contract or something like that, this way icos can't cheat anyone, smart contract will payout automatically to bounty participants. people also should really start using platform like wings.

I really like this idea

[elenka n]

It seems to me that it is necessary to introduce not restrictions, but regulation of ICO, so that we can achieve great results!

[gwaposakon]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

You got a point in there. Scam projects and ICOs are turning up every now and then and it is unfortunate to be a victim of it. That is why I think that putting restrictions and at least regulating these ICOs would somehow minimize if not eliminate scam ICOs. It's time that these activities will be stopped.

[maculeth]

that would be good, but I think it would be difficult, because all of us here don't know the exact procedure we have to do to report to the ico team that did the scam.

[kipoel]

I believe to make that kind of restriction fro crypto market, would need the country to take part in this cyrpto market.
But since these days there are still a little part of the country that already aware and understand about crypto market, then it could be a bit difficult to makes those kind of restrictions.

[cryptonight9631]

I think also that it is time. Because the investors and also the bounty hunters has already suffered enough. They participate on a worthless project that is also even a scam one.

[Starfranko]

Your suggestion is fantastic but regulation in an open system has been a problem and will continue to be for a long time to come. But nothing real urgent need to be done to curb the fraudulent activities going on in the crypto-currency ecosystem

[OluwaTosin10]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

I agree with you on these
But restricting icos to prevent fraud is not an individual task
It requires each government to take a legal step by requiring the details of deva before launched
But how do you intend to become the intermediary??

[Catmurs]

It seems to me that it is necessary to introduce not restrictions, but regulation of ICO, so that we can achieve great results!

I think full regulation can bring complete decentralization to the market that we don't need , but I think the creators of the ico should be responsible