Is it possible to do this?

[manismanja]

It is very difficult to implement this idea, preferably ICO should die and then we will have another form of birth. Like projects launched by famous exchanges, we will be safer because those projects have been censored by leading experts in the world

yes it is difficult to implement, so it will make ICO difficult. if the project is good it will likely succeed there.
now to run ICO it is very difficult so it is not easy now if the project can succeed. maybe this is for a short break, because there has been no improvement for the ICO, maybe next year the ICO will improve, so that the project can run well, without implementing it.

[1715114087]

1715114087

[1715114087]

1715114087

[1715114087]

1715114087

[graffix]

If there is that kind of system it will be great. But it will not be easy. Many rules and regulations have to adapt to do that. But I'm not sure will it comply with the Blockchain technology. If somehow it happened that will be great for the investors.

[RobotNIK]

It would not be bad, but only if it became a mandatory criterion for all ICOs, without which there could be no talk of product creation!

[Metall303]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

how are you going to create some kind of independent system? if it is some kind of campaign or just some kind of group of people, then they can be corrupt. the only opportunity to realize your idea is the use of artificial intelligence

[wxganz]

A lot of such projects have been created but none of them has coped with the task. I really want to see such a project. Since there is a lot of scam on the ICO market.

[Dannev]

This has been the suggestion of many these days. Honestly, it should be looked into. Sometimes, I just wonder if all these ICO fall from the sky. The scam associated with it is much now.

[gowobonyok]

indeed, it's time for ico to start doing such restrictions in order to avoid fraud. or at least compensation for participants or investors when ico fails or does not meet the target. because all this time, ico will only disappear without responsibility.

[tuanytcc]

Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards

[Metall303]

Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards

Why do you think developer responsibility is low now? it all depends on what country the project is being done. if it is the United States then all the responsibility on the developers. And if they do not fulfill their promises to investors, then they can go to prison

[gudjhonson]

Responsibility of project developers is still too few and mostly, almost risk will belong to investors. This form will be also eliminated afterwards

I think all developers are responsible, it's just that there are some people who abuse their responsibilities, this makes the project difficult to succeed. Sometimes temptation is stronger than responsibility, so whatever it is we have to be able to understand and see the developer with its performance. For verification, I see that there have been many projects that have carried out verification, and this will be an important part of the ICO.

[Huntler1993]

Yeah that will be nice but I think most of the victims of these fraudulent project are one way or the other responsible for their own actions. I sometimes even don't get it. They know nothing about  the project and they invest and most are also not willing to learn. Lets try to open our eyes and minds.

[agusiska]

i think is a must, something must be made for controlling and regulated where is the real ico project and where is the fake one..

[Pffrt]

It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.

[Adhichan]

It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.

i think investing in any ico now quite risky for us.its didnt profitable anymore, only less projects tat able to keep their price stable in market, and another project failed

[uniquark]

It is quite a little bit same thoughts of STO. I think STO will be introduced more and people will only invest on STO coins only. ICO are these days no more trusted because of their fraudness. I personally didn't invest in any ICO since the last of 2017.

The current STO projects are not many, because most projects want a lot of conditions to be able to STO. Therefore ICO is still an option for most projects

[crossabdd]

It has been done a long time ago, actually ICO is good through Escrow. but now there are too many ICOs that don't use escrow. so investors must accept the situation when their money is lost. now the ICO is bigger on scam. so that most investors have lost trust. so choosing a good ICO is difficult. even though data verification. it cannot guarantee that ICO is successful.

[NY-city]

Dear forum participants, I think it's time to introduce restrictions on the ICO. The reason for my proposal was a huge number of fraudulent projects that are hiding with investors' finances, don't pay bounties compensation when the desired amount is reached, etc. I propose to create a verification system that will become an intermediary between the investor and the ICO.

This is necessary for investors, that is us, but who wants to take on such a burden? I think no one, which means everything will remain as it is, and the scammers are becoming more literate, gained experience and began to deceive us better

[libert19]

Regulations are already coming for ICOs and for cryptocurrencies in general, although not all countries have started yet but surely progress is being made. So scammy ICO will fade away little by little.

[ottogary]

Restriction is good for the future of cryptocurrency project. It will be able to act as a guaranty for any investors or bounty participant that the project is a legit one. People don't need to be worried anymore cause any new project already been legally registered as a legit project.

[sekop]

With the rules made, it certainly can make both parties mutually beneficial, so the existence of a legitimate project, the fraud project will disappear by itself. This can be a positive impact on further ICO development.