what prevents projects from keeping token value?

[ningo]

Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.

[hbcenk]

Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.

The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews

[strawhatters]

Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.

The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews

Well it is not like all those researches are at least 90% accurate. It just means that the reputation of ICO's are constantly getting damaged because of all these scams and fraudulent cryptocurrencies around. It deals a really heavy blow to the whole market.

[supine]

There are actually a lot of factors and circumstances that affect the value of a certain token. Community members affects the price, if the community does not trust the project because of slow development people will surely sell and just move to another project. Some projects are also selling their own token to gather more funds since projects need further development and marketing.

[CryptoBry]

Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.

We have to always remember that many projects introduced via the ICO platform are experimental in nature so there is that big possibility of failure. Now, coupled that with the fact that scammers are already here in this sphere so people or investors are not yet so serious in getting into alts. I have no problem with Bitcoin and other top cryptocurrency because I think they have already proven their worth though there are still many non-believers of cryptocurrency (though they might be believing with the blockchain). This year, things are different from 2017 when projects even with less value can easily find investors or token buyers and can rise in the exchanges...this time people are already scrutinizing and many failed the test indeed. In my view, a project can really take time to take off and after the phase of the ICO things can go wrong somehow somewhere because human nature can be setting in. Stories like Tezos and Envion come to my mind on this regard.

[WalkerIVIV]

Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.

The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews

Well it is not like all those researches are at least 90% accurate. It just means that the reputation of ICO's are constantly getting damaged because of all these scams and fraudulent cryptocurrencies around. It deals a really heavy blow to the whole market.

Even the wrong decision by the developer can give a huge impact to the credibility of the project itself and you can see what has already happened with mobilego and it has been splitted into the two developers group and there is a lot of investors are feeling sad and try to get out from there as soon as possible. Gamecredit has been doing the same as mobile go as far as i remember.

[Lindazz]

Most of the time, you can't stop people from selling.
The market can tell which projects are good and which are bad, and I think there's no stopping it.

[tableofcontents]

Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.

A portion of these projects would probably be scams or very poor project. But sometimes even if the project is good, there's this human error and it would be the fault of the management that things didn't go well.

[kumar jabodah]

There should be a working product that can really be used by people, Unique and of course useful. They should also be active and their tokens are in good exchange. It's definitely a big advantage to other ICO Campaigns and it is possible that when it comes to listing it comes to price at ICO Price immediately or beyond.

[sedihnya8]

Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.

yes, I also do not understand the purpose of some projects that are just fraud even there are projects that have been running but they do not keep their tokens price as if their tokens become shitcoin

[Reid]

You already have the answer to the question.

It wont go up in value because of the lazy team behind it. They see how much the profit they made from the ICO and just want to run away taking the money with them.
They are really not the project type for long time holders.
You should seek for something that will gain value short term or long term. Pick one and be sure that if it is short term then withdraw quickly after a good listing.

[YuginKadoya]

You already have the answer to the question.

It wont go up in value because of the lazy team behind it. They see how much the profit they made from the ICO and just want to run away taking the money with them.
They are really not the project type for long time holders.
You should seek for something that will gain value short term or long term. Pick one and be sure that if it is short term then withdraw quickly after a good listing.

I really think not all ICO had such malicious intent like that, I had once encountered an ICO that failed in their Hardcap so they need to back out and end the bounty campaign and their ICO, But they have returned the invested money of all investors, Yes they had experience bankruptcy from making an ICO, But they will not step that low to run for the money even if they can do it, Well I had experienced it from the two bounty I joined in, But I am not saying to fully trust all ICO's I am just sharing my experience with two that had gained my respect, We just need to research more and see if the team had credibility of our trust, Because that will sure lower the risk of a scam ICO.

[juljon18]

You have to have a solid plan in place to make it at this point.  The market is an absolute blood bath.  If you do not have a plan, white paper and project leads that can be researched I think your climbing an uphill battle.  Soon you will need a proper working project before you begin.  I think we are at that phase now. 

[cryptodigitz]

The whole idea of a startup project launchedi to the market is very sensitive and requires lot of commitment from the team to make it a possibility and once there is a flop on their part then everything is messed up and the value drops as well

[tenebriscaelum]

If what you mean is the tokens that are listed in exchanges that are losing its initial value it will either be that the investors are losing interest of the investors that put money into the project is the whales that you want to manipulate it. Either way it is really hard to determine. If what you are mentioning is the scam projects then it is an entirely different subject to what your headline is as you can trace scam activities if you are just keen into observing.

[kier010]

it could project are still in development so no demands yet. projects that are useless and have no use in daily lives will ended in failure. the team behind the project can also affect it. teams that have no objectives or even teams that have objectives but don't put effort to it can affect the project.

[vova.andreyan.94]

I think the main reason, either in an unsuccessful project, or an irresponsible team!

[John Emst]

I believe all the problems are different projects. First of all, their shortcomings. So, any project must develop and have demand. And when they are unfinished, they are like a link in a chain. Once it is torn and all.

[Herlina]

Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.

Good products and good project development are not perfect if not promoted, so I think marketing is one of the important factors to get lots of users and investors, the project must have an experienced marketing team to promote their products and projects

[anaivanova726]

I believe that the projects initially setting the bar too high for their coins . therefore, it turns out that the expected one but in fact 5 or even 10 times less after the release