Announcing BPIP - The Bitcointalk Public Information Project!

[fortunecrypto]

This is probably one of the best thread in this section so many merits compiled here and this tool is such a big help to the community, I think only Bitcointalk has this kind of tool, I have not found this to any forum.

[1714119684]

1714119684

[Initscri]

Seems that every time I try to just simply type in bpip.org into my browser, it doesn't resolve. Same goes for www.bpip.org

https://bpip.org/ resolves instantly.

@Vod, do you know if the site is setup to point non-https requests to https. This could be affecting SEO among traffic.

And then this is fixed once the site actually loads under https.

Is anyone else experiencing this?

[TheBeardedBaby]

Seems that every time I try to just simply type in bpip.org into my browser, it doesn't resolve. Same goes for www.bpip.org

https://bpip.org/ resolves instantly.

@Vod, do you know if the site is setup to point non-https requests to https. This could be affecting SEO among traffic.

And then this is fixed once the site actually loads under https.

Is anyone else experiencing this?

I reported that a year ago :

Just a small suggestions.
Redirect the http://bpip.org to https://bpip.org
Now it comes error 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied.

Tried it when the site was down for maintenance due to security certificates expiration as Vod suggested then, it didn't work. Seems like it's still an issue
I got a timeout now

[Initscri]

Seems that every time I try to just simply type in bpip.org into my browser, it doesn't resolve. Same goes for www.bpip.org

https://bpip.org/ resolves instantly.

@Vod, do you know if the site is setup to point non-https requests to https. This could be affecting SEO among traffic.

And then this is fixed once the site actually loads under https.

Is anyone else experiencing this?

I reported that a year ago :

Just a small suggestions.
Redirect the http://bpip.org to https://bpip.org
Now it comes error 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied.

Tried it when the site was down for maintenance due to security certificates expiration as Vod suggested then, it didn't work. Seems like it's still an issue
I got a timeout now

Yea, I'm not getting a 403 anymore, just a time-out.

Vod would either have to implement code, or he can try on a DNS level (but it's tricky). I usually just recommend Cloudflare's HTTPS force option. It makes it a hell of a lot easier for this.

[LoyceV]

I realize I've mentioned it before, but I now run into it weekly so out of self-interest I'm posting a request:
Can BPIP re-check all userIDs it didn't index? I use BPIP to get userIDs for the usernames in theymos' Trust data dump, and just this week, 3 usernames (and userIDs) are missing from BPIP (which means I have to manually add them to update my Trust list viewer):
TYCOON_official
GOLD_official
usernetwork7248
My estimate is that at least a few tens of thousands of userIDs are missing. If you can check which (consecutive) userIDs are missing in your database, you can scrape those profiles to update them.

[bitmover]

I would like to make a small suggestion

I saw you add DT1 to the user profiles when they are on DT1. Why don't you add DT2 information as well?
I would like to see that feature.

[TheBeardedBaby]

The site is up and running again, but what i notice is that there is a difference with 1 merit between the received and total score, See below.
Just a note I had 10 merit airdoped.

Link to my profile > https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iasenko

P.S.
It's same with LoyceV, https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LoyceV
No change after refreshing the profile.

Around 10 days ago I warned about the difference in the the received merit and total merit score values. It's still off by one.

[bitmover]

Around 10 days ago I warned about the difference in the the received merit and total merit score values. It's still off by one.

I noticed that about a month ago as well. But few days later it was ok. I don't know if it was vod's intervention or if it just synced or whatever.

[Veleor]

BPIP.org is showing that profiles 'Nando1970', 'Rubyjona' and 'GPT COIN' woke up at July 20, 2019.

But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?


[BPIP] Nando1970

Code:

8/31/2018 11:51:44 PM 	password changed
7/20/2019 05:38:35 PM 	woke up

[BPIP] Rubyjona

Code:

8/25/2018 04:52:46 PM 	password changed
7/20/2019 05:36:48 PM 	woke up

[BPIP] GPT COIN

Code:

8/26/2018 12:56:02 AM 	password changed
7/20/2019 05:44:51 PM 	woke up

<...>

• July 20, 2019, 06:17:28 PM - ValeryO - woke up
• July 20, 2019, 05:38:35 PM - Nando1970 - woke up
  
• July 20, 2019, 05:37:48 PM - etherare - woke up
• July 20, 2019, 05:17:18 PM - mugt - password reset via email

<...>

[OmegaStarScream]

BPIP.org is showing that profiles 'Nando1970', 'Rubyjona' and 'GPT COIN' woke up at July 20, 2019.

But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?
-snip-

As you can see in the seclog link, the newbies are hidden (Somehow, Nando1970 is still showing even tho he's a newbie), you can see the two other members here: https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php?all

[Vod]

Moving the servers into a production domain, preparing for guaranteed service contracts.    Site will be down without warning.

iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon.  I'm not ignoring you. 

[Initscri]

Moving the servers into a production domain, preparing for guaranteed service contracts.    Site will be down without warning.

iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon.  I'm not ignoring you. 

Lol, np. Didn't think you were.

[JayJuanGee]

For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either.  Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed.  Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page.  https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity

[Vod]

For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either.  Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed.  Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page.  https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity

Thanks for letting me know.   Turns out I was pulling from a wrong table.  :/

[JayJuanGee]

For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either.  Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed.  Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page.  https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity

Thanks for letting me know.   Turns out I was pulling from a wrong table.  :/

Thanks. no problem.

Activity ranking seems to be working now, and I see that the activity ranking list is synchronized more accurately with the rest of the activity level data.

[Easteregg69]

Greetings early birds.

BPIP sounds allmost like PIP but it has that tint of renewal. Great idea!

As i told the birds. First i got pip and then kuk and now you come with BPIP. Make it loud!

[heavycar]

Why did this peter griffin guy put so much effort into this instead of building a real business?  It look good and all but dont think the effort is worth it.

[ibminer]

Why did this peter griffin guy put so much effort into this instead of building a real business?  It look good and all but dont think the effort is worth it.

It's a joint effort, and well worth it! ...

[LoyceV]

iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon.  I'm not ignoring you.  

No rush, I know it's easier/faster to make requests than actually implement them

[Timelord2067]

Help me out here somebody...

According to the Most Recognised list I'm currently in 40^th position and am DT2



However over yonder on @LoyceV's DT1/2 list I'm nowhere to be seen...

An update with the latest Trust scores and this morning's Trust data dump:

DT 1

(Meh (as Alaki would say))

DT 2

(Meh)

What gives?