Negative and positive trust must be review first.

[escalante28]

I just noticed some members here is having a negative trust with insufficient evidence or no probable cause. Maybe it is time to set a staff to review the trust given by the other members before it will reflect to the profile of that person. The purpose of this is not to abuse that privilege because giving someone a negative trust is like destroying his/her reputation in this furom.

[kobita333]

Have you read this thread by theymos?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0

For your info- Trusts which are visible in your profile by me/any other members, are from DT member and those DT members are fair enough AFAIK.

[escalante28]

Have you read this thread by theymos?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0

For your info- Trusts which are visible in your profile by me/any other members, are from DT member and those DT members are fair enough AFAIK.

What do you mean  DT?  Anyone can put a feedback on your profile and as long you have a negative trust there some opportunity here that  you can't join because they don't  care where your negative feedback came from.

[kobita333]

Have you read this thread by theymos?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0

For your info- Trusts which are visible in your profile by me/any other members, are from DT member and those DT members are fair enough AFAIK.

What do you mean  DT?  Anyone can put a feedback on your profile and as long you have a negative trust there some opportunity here that  you can't join because they don't  care where your negative feedback came from.

Trust feedback from anyone will not be visible in your profile, as far as I know.
Only from DT(Default Trust) members will be seen.

DT members are persons who are trusted by theymos.

[TheUltraElite]

What do you mean  DT?  

DT stands for Default Trust members. They are a selective group of people who are in the Default Trust list of every user. Long standing of this forum has shown that they are trustworthy in forum deals and thus the name.

Anyone can put a feedback on your profile and as long you have a negative trust there some opportunity here that  you can't join because they don't  care where your negative feedback came from.

First of all any person can post feedback on your profile. That does not mean that the feedback needs to be accurate. People who still have some common sense will actually try to investigate any reason behind the feedback and if there is none they would ignore it. Those feedback remain under "Untrusted feedback" and wont show up unless clicked on.

On the other hand feedback from a DT member will be fairly correct and will show up as "trusted feedback" on your trust wall. Although this is subjective still they wont give you a negative trust unless you do something seriously bad to the forum like cheating campaigns with alt accounts, scam someone, buy/sell forum accounts.

I believe you are coming to this opinion from getting rejected from some bounty campaign, which in that case you just have to accept and move on. Such bounty managers are not doing their work properly if they are not looking in the reference of the feedback. But do care to link it here?
P.S This thread belongs to "Reputation" not "Meta"

[escalante28]

What do you mean  DT?  

DT stands for Default Trust members. They are a selective group of people who are in the Default Trust list of every user. Long standing of this forum has shown that they are trustworthy in forum deals and thus the name.

Anyone can put a feedback on your profile and as long you have a negative trust there some opportunity here that  you can't join because they don't  care where your negative feedback came from.

First of all any person can post feedback on your profile. That does not mean that the feedback needs to be accurate. People who still have some common sense will actually try to investigate any reason behind the feedback and if there is none they would ignore it. Those feedback remain under "Untrusted feedback" and wont show up unless clicked on.

On the other hand feedback from a DT member will be fairly correct and will show up as "trusted feedback" on your trust wall. Although this is subjective still they wont give you a negative trust unless you do something seriously bad to the forum like cheating campaigns with alt accounts, scam someone, buy/sell forum accounts.

I believe you are coming to this opinion from getting rejected from some bounty campaign, which in that case you just have to accept and move on. Such bounty managers are not doing their work properly if they are not looking in the reference of the feedback. But do care to link it here?
P.S This thread belongs to "Reputation" not "Meta"

Thank you for your effort to explain it to me. And you got my point about getting rejected from bounty.  I have to move this on reputation.

[Deena]

What do you mean  DT?  

DT stands for Default Trust members. They are a selective group of people who are in the Default Trust list of every user. Long standing of this forum has shown that they are trustworthy in forum deals and thus the name.

Anyone can put a feedback on your profile and as long you have a negative trust there some opportunity here that  you can't join because they don't  care where your negative feedback came from.

First of all any person can post feedback on your profile. That does not mean that the feedback needs to be accurate. People who still have some common sense will actually try to investigate any reason behind the feedback and if there is none they would ignore it. Those feedback remain under "Untrusted feedback" and wont show up unless clicked on.

On the other hand feedback from a DT member will be fairly correct and will show up as "trusted feedback" on your trust wall. Although this is subjective still they wont give you a negative trust unless you do something seriously bad to the forum like cheating campaigns with alt accounts, scam someone, buy/sell forum accounts.

I believe you are coming to this opinion from getting rejected from some bounty campaign, which in that case you just have to accept and move on. Such bounty managers are not doing their work properly if they are not looking in the reference of the feedback. But do care to link it here?
P.S This thread belongs to "Reputation" not "Meta"

Laughable post. DT members not members with more trust ethics but members with more trust power. That's all. For the rest they are often more corrupt than the innocent members that are victimized by them for their own agenda.