Stunna
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 08:33:18 AM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator?  Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in |
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2014, 10:34:16 AM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design  I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security |
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:02:05 PM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security I think 2FA is a key feature for investors but not players. Nope. As a player I would love to have 2fa. Pretty much everyone who uses online bitcoin sites like coinbase and blockchain are used to 2fa. |
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2014, 08:02:58 PM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security I think 2FA is a key feature for investors but not players. Nope. As a player I would love to have 2fa. Pretty much everyone who uses online bitcoin sites like coinbase and blockchain are used to 2fa.
Optional Google Authenticator two-factor authentication is now available!Available for both players and investors of course |
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
March 16, 2014, 03:04:03 AM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security I think 2FA is a key feature for investors but not players. Nope. As a player I would love to have 2fa. Pretty much everyone who uses online bitcoin sites like coinbase and blockchain are used to 2fa.
Optional Google Authenticator two-factor authentication is now available!Available for both players and investors of course That was fast.... |
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
March 16, 2014, 06:19:26 AM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security I think 2FA is a key feature for investors but not players. Nope. As a player I would love to have 2fa. Pretty much everyone who uses online bitcoin sites like coinbase and blockchain are used to 2fa.
Optional Google Authenticator two-factor authentication is now available!Available for both players and investors of course That was fast.... That's light speed! I dont think that was: 299,792,458 m/s |
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 16, 2014, 10:04:31 AM |
|
Out of curiosity, how many people already familiar with and using Google Authenticator? Probably every single person that has completed any bitcoin transaction. I'd add that in Hi Stunna! Pleasure to have you in our thread, we always love PD's design I see.. Wow, I thought it is only popular among IT people, because it is not straightforward to use it. Good then, it is really great feature to ensure our players' security I think 2FA is a key feature for investors but not players. Nope. As a player I would love to have 2fa. Pretty much everyone who uses online bitcoin sites like coinbase and blockchain are used to 2fa.
Optional Google Authenticator two-factor authentication is now available!Available for both players and investors of course That was fast.... That's light speed! I dont think that was: 299,792,458 m/s Happy to see that few people start using this feature in EveryDice |
|
|
|
|
uptweets
|
|
March 16, 2014, 02:42:54 PM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyraishi
|
|
March 16, 2014, 03:44:40 PM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
How it would be safer with 2FA ? |
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 16, 2014, 05:04:57 PM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
How it would be safer with 2FA ? It helps to ensure that only person with Google Authenticator key has access to his/her account. 2FA will protect if somehow someone is able to got your password (can be from guessing your password / brute force, keylogger, you use same password from untrusted site, etc.) , they still wont be able to access your account. |
|
|
|
|
wang_yan
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:47:46 AM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
How it would be safer with 2FA ? It helps to ensure that only person with Google Authenticator key has access to his/her account. 2FA will protect if somehow someone is able to got your password (can be from guessing your password / brute force, keylogger, you use same password from untrusted site, etc.) , they still wont be able to access your account. It's a key feature for any website storing users' funds. |
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:39:50 AM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
How it would be safer with 2FA ? It helps to ensure that only person with Google Authenticator key has access to his/her account. 2FA will protect if somehow someone is able to got your password (can be from guessing your password / brute force, keylogger, you use same password from untrusted site, etc.) , they still wont be able to access your account. It's a key feature for any website storing users' funds. To add on: They now need your password AND your phone to access your account. |
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:16:06 AM |
|
Thank you for this great update, the investors' funds are safer under 2FA.
How it would be safer with 2FA ? It helps to ensure that only person with Google Authenticator key has access to his/her account. 2FA will protect if somehow someone is able to got your password (can be from guessing your password / brute force, keylogger, you use same password from untrusted site, etc.) , they still wont be able to access your account. It's a key feature for any website storing users' funds. To add on: They now need your password AND your phone to access your account. Exactly Nahtnam CMIIW, 2FA method also commonly used for internet banking. |
|
|
|
|
|
boumalo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:53:41 PM |
|
Congrats on the website : being able to invest and 0.1% of referal bets is great; it could be nice to have a list of the biggest investors and see how much they get out of their investment because it would show that the system is fair and that we can make money out of investing on everydice I would like to be able to know how many people I referred and how much each one made me earn (Is that ok if I give my referral link to everydice : https://everydice.com/?r=744 I would love having someone play on everydice and get some dust to bet myself) |
|
|
|
martin23
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:40:00 PM |
|
I click deposit and no adress show up. Waiting several minutes and still no adress. I`m using FireFox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RGBKey
|
|
March 17, 2014, 10:26:09 PM |
|
Why you should always roll low:
The house edge is lower if you roll low. By how much you may ask? Well, i'll tell you.
Due to the way the numbers are generated, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that instead of your roll being a random number between 0 and 999,999 (rolls between 0.0000 and 99.9999) it will be a random number between 0 and 65,535. (rolls between 0.0000 and 6.5535) This means if you roll low, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that you will always win.
tl;dr smart gamblers bet on low
|
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
March 17, 2014, 10:33:12 PM |
|
Why you should always roll low:
The house edge is lower if you roll low. By how much you may ask? Well, i'll tell you.
Due to the way the numbers are generated, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that instead of your roll being a random number between 0 and 999,999 (rolls between 0.0000 and 99.9999) it will be a random number between 0 and 65,535. (rolls between 0.0000 and 6.5535) This means if you roll low, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that you will always win.
tl;dr smart gamblers bet on low
Did you put "1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance" when you meant "((48576/1000000)^124)% chance"? |
|
|
|
|
RGBKey
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:17:55 PM |
|
Why you should always roll low:
The house edge is lower if you roll low. By how much you may ask? Well, i'll tell you.
Due to the way the numbers are generated, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that instead of your roll being a random number between 0 and 999,999 (rolls between 0.0000 and 99.9999) it will be a random number between 0 and 65,535. (rolls between 0.0000 and 6.5535) This means if you roll low, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that you will always win.
tl;dr smart gamblers bet on low
Did you put "1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance" when you meant "((48576/1000000)^124)% chance"? No. |
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:28:40 PM |
|
Why you should always roll low:
The house edge is lower if you roll low. By how much you may ask? Well, i'll tell you.
Due to the way the numbers are generated, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that instead of your roll being a random number between 0 and 999,999 (rolls between 0.0000 and 99.9999) it will be a random number between 0 and 65,535. (rolls between 0.0000 and 6.5535) This means if you roll low, there is a 1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance that you will always win.
tl;dr smart gamblers bet on low
Did you put "1 in ((48576/1000000)^124) chance" when you meant "((48576/1000000)^124)% chance"? No. Ok, well the number in the parenthesis is under 1. In fact it's very very very close to 0. What is a 1-in-under 1 chance of something happening? Infinity? |
|
|
|
|
