Warning: How many of you Bears have ever been a victim of a Short Squeeze?

[cypherdoc]

If Emptygox opens up BTC withdrawals even at a limited rate, we could well see this baby shoot from 90 to 900.

Easily because the USD's never got out and are just sitting there ready to be mobilized.

Not to mention all the additional from those of us who sent money in. 

[1715687334]

1715687334

[1715687334]

1715687334

[1715687334]

1715687334

[1715687334]

1715687334

[1715687334]

1715687334

[cypherdoc]

The Breakaway is upon you.

[cypherdoc]

have you?

[Melbustus]

Bumping these threads is so much fun.

I remember thinking during Q2-Q4 2011 that it would be a blast to revisit those threads years down the road. Well, here we are, at 100x the price, while a new crop of similarly narrow-minded weak-thinkers have the same short-term-focused discussion over and over.

Looking forward to bumping current threads in 2017.

#we'veTalkedAboutThisBefore

[HeliKopterBen]

Lets see if China holds:

[S3052]

nope, at least its below the line at the moment

[cypherdoc]

The pressure during this pullback in 2011  was orders of magnitude greater than what we are seeing now.  When it was much less clear that Bitcoin was going to make it.

The huge bid walls we're seeing right now indicate the bear is almost over along with the record shorts on BFX. We had some deep despair as well yesterday with David Seaman apparently freaking out on Twitter along with Flibbr. Unfortunately, those are good signs.

Also the number of persistent trolls cheering here in out presence tells you something. Just like the trolls in this thread 3y ago.  There's an agenda in place.

[NotLambchop]

...[X and Y] indicate the bear is almost over ...

>Mantra

[cypherdoc]

...[X and Y] indicate the bear is almost over ...

>Mantra

yawn

[cypherdoc]

this is a brilliant chart by inca, btw.

notice this:  none of us early adopters are going anywhere:

[cypherdoc]

this is a brilliant chart by inca, btw.

notice this:  none of us early adopters are going anywhere:

hmmm, why are they reaccumulating?

[NotLambchop]

Cypherdoc.  When you [mistakenly] feel you have something to add, use the button instead of making more posts

When posting large images, do this:

Code:

[img width=400] [/img]

You may now return to losing money by the boatload.

  ~Miss Manners

[cypherdoc]

Cypherdoc.  When you [mistakenly] feel you have something to add, use the button instead of making more posts

When posting large images, do this:

Code:

[img width=400] [/img]

You may now return to losing money by the boatload.

  ~Miss Manners

yawn

[cypherdoc]

i still need an answer to this:



why are they reaccumulating?

[NotLambchop]

Cypherdoc.  When you [mistakenly] feel you have something to add, use the button instead of making more posts

When posting large images, do this:

Code:

[img width=400] [/img]

You may now return to losing money by the boatload.

  ~Miss Manners

yawn

While you were out bike riding, Bitcoin fell $30

How much coin is in your bag, so I can add some numbers to teh lel?

[cypherdoc]

i still need an answer to this:



why are they reaccumulating?

someone answer me!

[cypherdoc]

if Bitcoin was destined to die, why would all these addresses risk leaving all that BTC in them, let alone continue to build the balances back up? 

answer:  it's totally secure and the owners know it.

[NotLambchop]

...
someone answer me!

Stop spamming.

[cypherdoc]

...
someone answer me!

-bullshit-

clearly, you can't answer with any semblance of intelligence.

[NotLambchop]

Calm down.  Is there someone else in the house with you?