★★★ EARN A WHOPPING 25% ON PROFITS - RitzGrandCasino.com ★★★

[RitzGrandCasino.]

Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.

I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is  war or the end of line for him?

An announcement will be made soon.

[1715524903]

1715524903

[STT]

I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

[hilariousandco]

I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.

[Sithara007]

Hello!

I want to join the campaign today!

BTC: 1EZEBjmMYxS5GvuwJJaHjUhTjKzS1EG98S

post count 128

[newIndia]

I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.

I think STT is saying Equate not only need to leave +ve Trust but also add Ritz in his trust setting to have this +ve trust in effect. Looks like for -ve trust to show, one does not need to add in trust setting, but for +ve trust to show, it is required.

[hilariousandco]

I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.

I think STT is saying Equate not only need to leave +ve Trust but also add Ritz in his trust setting to have this +ve trust in effect. Looks like for -ve trust to show, one does not need to add in trust setting, but for +ve trust to show, it is required.

I still don't think it will matter because most people have the 'Trust depth' set at 2 as standard and it'd need to be at a trust depth of 3, not to mention he might not want to put him on his trusted list. I'm sure Ritz's feedback score will balance out eventually as long as he doesn't keep getting more. Threatening people with legal action wont help as well.

[pandacoin]

I was not online for medical reasons. Now I'm back again. I see I got paid from Ritz. Thank you again for this opportunity.

[pandacoin]

BTW I'm Full Member now. (All my posts from May is in Full Member status) Should I do anything, or will system know me as Full Member automatically?

[Lauda]

Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.

I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is  war or the end of line for him?

He doesn't really have to. These rates are fine. This race for the highest payment has to stop at some point or the campaign provides will run out of money pretty quickly.

[hilariousandco]

BTW I'm Full Member now. (All my posts from May is in Full Member status) Should I do anything, or will system know me as Full Member automatically?

You're best messaging him to let him know. I don't think in this particular instance it updates automatically.

[trynmpo]

Hello,

Re joining from "FULL MEMBER" Status
post count 219 ( 220 including this )

wallet :- 1NsxkwXCXUd1qBs3bisZ7msAKVzEezouPK

Thanks

[sameev29]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

[ChuckBuck]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

[sgk]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.

[sameev29]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

[gondel]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.

Yes, he really pays! I ve got two payments already and hope i will still participate and be part of this project. It is not only the highest paying offer for posting on this forum, but it is almost the highest paid sig camp at all at all forums they pay for posting.
BR,

Gondel

[BitCoinDream]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

This program really pays. I was paid for last 2 month and have also enrolled for this month. Price is higher this month and if we are lucky enough it may even go higher. Dont worry about the payment. It is automatic.

[ChuckBuck]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

Basically you would have to post alot to get to that rate.  Also, it depends on your Member status

New rates for May. Starting on May 1st

Hero members, we will pay you:
0.0013 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Sr member,  we will pay you:
0.0011 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.
 
Full Members We will pay you:
0.0007 BTC Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Members We will pay you:
0.0005 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Obviously, the member that received over 1 BTC was a Hero member, but it can be done if you're diligent enough and post enough every day.

[sgk]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

Because they're not spamming. People get paid based on number of posts and you certainly don't expect members to spam the forum just to get paid high, do you?

[BitCoinDream]

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.

Yes, he really pays! I ve got two payments already and hope i will still participate and be part of this project. It is not only the highest paying offer for posting on this forum, but it is almost the highest paid sig camp at all at all forums they pay for posting.
BR,

Gondel

@Gondel May I know the other forum Ritz pay for posting ?

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

Basically you would have to post alot to get to that rate.  Also, it depends on your Member status

New rates for May. Starting on May 1st

Hero members, we will pay you:
0.0013 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Sr member,  we will pay you:
0.0011 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.
 
Full Members We will pay you:
0.0007 BTC Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Members We will pay you:
0.0005 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Obviously, the member that received over 1 BTC was a Hero member, but it can be done if you're diligent enough and post enough every day.

Equate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=111810) was a Sr. Member and received 0.001 BTC per post to reach 1 BTC. So, 1000 posts per month, which is quite reasonable...