★★★ EARN A WHOPPING 25% ON PROFITS - RitzGrandCasino.com ★★★

[newIndia]

OOPS ...what is going on ? Ritz is continuously earning negatives, whereas he was supposed to earn positives !!! Its very confusing how the trust system is working !!!

A group of people targeting him. and its not good for forum.

Admin has no intention to change this trust system which is currently worst and just few peoples using for personal like and dislike

There was a long discussion regarding this in the meta section => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=565488.0

[1715593401]

1715593401

[philipma1957]

I just was catching up on my trust posts.  I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.

when you get a chance please do so for me.

Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.

[ChuckBuck]

I just was catching up on my trust posts.  I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.

when you get a chance please do so for me.

Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.

Speaking of payout, you're probably on your way to half a Bitcoin at your Hero rate this month.  Not bad for doing what you'd normally do in here.   

[philipma1957]

I just was catching up on my trust posts.  I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.

when you get a chance please do so for me.

Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.

Speaking of payout, you're probably on your way to half a Bitcoin at your Hero rate this month.  Not bad for doing what you'd normally do in here.   

Yeah I post about 100 posts a week.  Been doing this for months.  Getting paid for it is nice for me.  I do give good info and tips on setup of gear. And try in general to be helpful to the forum and the world of btc. (alt coins too).

So getting .4 to .6 btc a month to do this is cool.  Hopefully it lasts for a 1/2 year or more.

[Lauda]

I just was catching up on my trust posts.  I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.

when you get a chance please do so for me.

Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.

Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.
We have this:

zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2)   2014-02-28   0.00000000      paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts

First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. 

[forever21]

Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.
We have this:

zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2)   2014-02-28   0.00000000      paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts

First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. 
[/quote]

i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?  i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation

i wonder why jelousy needs to be born 

[Hasher99]

I just was catching up on my trust posts.  I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.

when you get a chance please do so for me.

Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.

Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.
We have this:

zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2)   2014-02-28   0.00000000      paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts

First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. 

As I saw the feedback. I think It's stupid to give feedback like that for spamming It's staff or moderator business to deal with this.

[Lauda]

i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?  i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation

i wonder why jelousy needs to be born 

Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here.

[forever21]

i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?  i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation

i wonder why jelousy needs to be born 

Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here.

exactly  but why he only chased ritz then? how about the others 

[newIndia]

i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?   i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation

i wonder why jelousy needs to be born  

Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here.

exactly   but why he only chased ritz then? how about the others  

Please read this thread and you'll know why Ritz was targetted => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499007.1460

I think, if all of us contribute in this thread with proper reasoning, we may take zackclark70 out of trust circle.

[hilariousandco]

The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.

[Lauda]

The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.

You can easily find that in the trust settings.
It was CanaryInTheMine who added him.

[newIndia]

The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.

You can easily find that in the trust settings.
It was CanaryInTheMine who added him.

I'm not getting a simple thing. Ritz has 2 -ve from people of +ve trust and 2 +ve from people of +ve trust. He has added none to his trust circle. So he should be standing at 0 trust now !!! Why -ve ?

[tspacepilot]

FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning.  I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.

[u9y42]

FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning.  I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.

I still see them with the negative trust warning... did you add Ritz to your trust list? I think that would be the only way for you not to see the warning.

EDIT: and looking at the feedback left, it all still appears to be there.

[newIndia]

FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning.  I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.

I just checked his post. It is still showing [-6: -1 / +2(2)] for me !!!

[tspacepilot]

FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning.  I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.

I just checked his post. It is still showing [-6: -1 / +2(2)] for me !!!

I wonder if there's someone in you guys' trust group who's not in mine.  I don't see any negative on him.  Although, if I click on his name, I can of course see the entire collection of feedback.

[Slark]

Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

[acs267]

Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.

[Hazir]

Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600446.0

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.

I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is  war or the end of line for him?